Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.51s
Beaver v. Mill Resort & Casino
180 Or. App. 324 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 27, 2002
Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Hayes, 325 Or 592, 596 , 943 P2d 197 (1997); Krushwitz v. McDonald’s Restaurants, 323 Or 520, 525-26 , 919 P2d 465 (1996); Norpac Foods, Inc. v. Gilmore, 318 Or 363, 366 , 867 P2d 1373 (1994). … Kiewit Pacific v. Ennis, 119 Or App 123, 126 , 849 P2d 541 (1993).
Cited 1 timesPublishedScott v. Sports Authority, Inc.
283 Or. App. 518 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 1, 2017
TriMet v. Wilkinson, 257 Or App 80, 85 , 304 P3d 46 (2013); SAIF v. Tull, 113 Or App 449, 454 , 832 P2d 1271 (1992) (en banc); Columbia Forest Products v. Woolner, 177 Or App 639 , 34 P3d 1203 (2001). … Co. v. CNA Insurance, 95 Or App 448, 451 , 769 P2d 789 (1989) (affirming board order holding that report reflecting acceptance of claim was not intended to be an acceptance).
Cited 1 timesPublishedWallis v. Crook County School District
13 Or. App. 174 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 23, 1973
Accord: Tempe Union High School Dist. v. Hopkins, 76 Ariz 228, 262 P2d 387 (1953); Reed v. Board of Education, 125 Cal App 714, 14 P2d 330 (1932); Smith v. … School District No. 18, 115 Mont 102 , 139 P2d 518 (1943); Tate v. New Mexico State Board of Education, 81 NM 323 , 466 P2d 889 (NM App 1970); Blood v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedIn Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Rook
276 Or. 695 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1976
See Board of Medical Examiners v. Mintz, 233 Or 441, 448 , 378 P2d 945 (1963). … See also Newman v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedRed Robin International v. Dombrosky
207 Or. App. 476 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 30, 2006
See, e.g., Tri-Met, Inc. v. Wolfe, 192 Or App 556 , 86 P3d 111 (2004). … Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. 1 In French-Davis v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedAdams v. Corvallis & E. R. Co.
78 Or. 117 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1915
Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 598 ( 101 Pac. 671 ); Brown v. Oregon Lumber Co., 24 Or. 317 ( 33 Pac. 557 ). … Marshall, 43 Or. 438, 444 ( 73 Pac. 330 ); Galvin v. Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 598 ( 101 Pac. 671 ).
Cited 7 timesPublishedRetchless v. Laurelhurst Thriftway
72 Or. App. 729 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 20, 1985
The Board relied on Bauman v. SAIF, 295 Or 788 , 670 P2d 1027 (1983). We disagree with the Board’s interpretation of Bauman . … See Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. McGehee, 72 Or App 12 , 695 P2d 92 (1985). Here, the referee and the Board found that claimant had sustained a new injury in 1978 while employed by Laurelhurst. We agree.
Cited 6 timesPublished370 Or. 823 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 2023
Kelly, 370 Or 645, 523 P3d 84 (2022) and Jones v. Brown, 370 Or 649, 523 P3d 82 (2022). A third similar case, Watkins v. Ackley, 370 Or 604, 523 P3d 604 (2022), was later also certified to the Supreme Court. … We held petitioner’s petition for review in abeyance pending decisions in Huggett v. Kelly, 370 Or 645, 523 P3d 84 (2022), and Jones v. Brown, 370 Or 649, 523 P3d 82 (2022).
Cited 3 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Galloway v. Watson
167 Or. 403 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1941
A.; Columbia River-Longview Bridge Co. v. Wellington, et al., 140 Or. 413 , 13 P. 2d 1075 ; People v. Pitcher, 61 Colo. 149 , 156 P. 812 , Ann. Cas. 1918D, 1185; Peninsular Power Co. v. … W. 371 ; Arkansas Tax Com. v. Turley, 185 Ark. 31 , 45 S. W. 2d 859 ; State v. Local Board, 225 Iowa 855 , 283 N. W. 87 .
Cited 9 timesPublished166 Or. 290 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1941
Richards v. Morison, 229 Mass. 458, 461 , 118 N. E. 868 .” … As was said by the court in Pratt v. Amalgamated Assn. of S. & E. Ry.
Cited 9 timesPublished131 Or. 563 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1929
And from State v. … Co. v. Wisconsin R.
Cited 31 timesPublishedO'CONNOR v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.
232 Or. App. 419 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 9, 2009
We review the board’s interpretation of a medical report under that standard. See SAIF v. … As we restated in Cummings v.
Cited 4 timesPublished309 Or. 342 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1990
State v. … This case is a sequel to, as well as a divergence from, State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), and State v. Lyon, 304 Or 221 , 744 P2d 231 (1987), but is consistent with Snow v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedAdelsperger v. Elkside Development LLC
374 Or. 375 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 2, 2025
376 Adelsperger v. … Barnett Resorts, LLC (defendant) has petitioned for reconsideration of our decision in Adelsperger v.
Cited 2 timesPublished9 Or. App. 116 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 21, 1972
The claimant, citing National Labor Relations Bd. v. … The Employment Division then cites IIan *120 nan v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedDivision of State Lands Employes Ass'n v. Division of State Lands
72 Or. App. 559 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 6, 1985
Labor Board, supra, and has held that the appropriate method to obtain review of Board orders in federal certification proceedings is to invite an unfair labor practice action for refusal to bargain. Boire v. … Boire v. Greyhound Corp., supra, 376 US at 479-80 . See Leedom v.
Cited 3 timesPublished6 Or. App. 526 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 12, 1971
The former created the State Board of Pharmacy and set forth its organization, power and duties. The Drug Advisory *529 Council thus was attached to the State Board of Pharmacy. In State v. … And in Nicoli v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedSpringfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19
24 Or. App. 751 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 17, 1976
Board v. Hearst Publications, 322 US 111 , 64 S Ct 851 , 88 L Ed 1170 (1944) (a case involving the National Labor Relations Board); Van Ripper v. Liquor Cont. Com., 228 Or 581 , 365 P2d 109 (1961). … Labor relations boards and courts in other jurisdictions have reached similar conclusions. Dunellen Bd. of Ed. v. Dunellen Ed.
Modified by Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19, 25 Or. App. 407 (1976)Cited 29 timesPublishedSmicz v. Deschutes County 911 Service Dist.
347 Or. App. 28 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 2026
SAIF v. Thompson, 360 Or 155, 161, 379 P3d 494 (2016)). … Given the record as a whole and the Board’s reasoning, we conclude that substantial evi- dence and reason supported the Board’s determination. See Zanetti v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAdams v. Transamerica Insurance Group
45 Or. App. 769 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1980
the exclusive appellate tribunal from Board orders. … See Schulz v. Compensation Department, 252 Or 211, 215 , 448 P2d 551 (1968); cf. Seeber v. Marlette Homes, Inc., 30 Or App 233 , 566 P2d 926 (1977); Greenwade v.
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna