Case law

Dissell v. Trans World Airlines

511 A.2d 441 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 19, 1986

Crider v. Zurich Insurance Co., 380 U.S. 39, 41 , 85 S.Ct. 769, 770 , 13 L.Ed.2d 641 (1965). See also Cardillo v. … Neither the agreement nor any other evidence in the record reflects that the agreement was ever approved by the Massachusetts Industrial Accidents Board.

Sawyer v. Calais National Bank

126 Me. 314 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 17, 1927

Myers v. Levenseller, 117 Maine, 82. “It was certainly within the power of the court to vacate the judgment if satisfied that it had been entered erroneously.” Hersey vs. Weeman, 120 Maine, 262. … Defendant relied upon Brown vs. Harris, 52 Am.

Lowden v. Graham

136 Me. 341 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 6, 1939

Brown v. Veazie, 25 Me., 359. “To prevent forfeitures strict constructions are not unreasonable.” Cressey v. Parks, 76 Me., 532. … So we find in Jones v.

Astrowsky v. First Portland Mortg. Corp., Inc.

887 F. Supp. 332 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 2, 1995

Bostick v. Rappleyea, 629 F.Supp. 1328, 1334 (N.D.N.Y.1985) (quoting Spirt v. … Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1122 (3d Cir.1982) (case arises under the National Labor Relations Act); N.L.R.B. v.

Maine Ass'n of Interdependent Neighborhoods v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human Services

732 F. Supp. 248 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 1, 1990

Id. at 842-43, n. 9 , 104 S.Ct. at 2781, n. 9 ; National Labor Relations Board v. United Food & Commercial Workers, 484 U.S. 112, 123 , 108 S.Ct. 413, 420 , 98 L.Ed.2d 429 (1987). … See, e.g., Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. Wichita Board of Trade, 412 U.S. 800, 808 , 93 S.Ct. 2367, 2375 , 37 L.Ed.2d 350 (1973); American Trucking Association v.

City of Portland v. Fisherman's Wharf Associates II

541 A.2d 160 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 27, 1988

Under the criteria we set forth in Thomas v. … Poire v. Manchester, 506 A.2d 1160, 1163-64 (Me.1986).

Keyes Fibre Co. v. Chaplin Corp.

97 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, D. Maine · May 8, 1951

Hoover v. … Coe is authority for the proposition that the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has jurisdiction to consider a bill in equity to review an action of the Board of Patent Appeals, where the Board has

Haskell v. Inhabitants of Knox

3 Me. 445 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1825

The case of Wood v. Waterville, cited by the counsel for the plaintiff, was decided upon the eighth section of the statute of Massachusetts of 1786, ch. 81. … Their omission not only renders the case of Wood v.

Savage v. Holyoke

59 Me. 345 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1871

Moore v. Moore, 21 Me. 354 ; Chandler v. Walker, 1 Fost. 286 ; 1 Chit. Pl. 196 and 199. … Brown v. Veazie, 25 Me. 362 ; 2 Washb. Real. Prop. 522.

New Maine National Bank v. Gendron

780 F. Supp. 52 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 18, 1991

See, e.g., Brown v. National Permanent Federal Savings and Loan Association, 683 F.2d 444, 447 (D.C.Cir.1982); Etta v. Seaboard Enterprises, Inc., 674 F.2d 913, 919 (D.C.Cir. 1982). In Brown , the D.C. … .’’); Mitchell v.

Austin v. Town of Dexter

522 F. Supp. 2d 38 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 8, 2008

Clarke v. … In Demmons v.

State v. Smith

256 A.2d 580 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 29, 1969

See, Smith v. Speers, Opinion May 22, 1969, Me., 253 A.2d 701 . … State v. Allen, 1967, Me., 235 A.2d 529 .

Littlefield v. Walsh

Superior Court of Maine · Feb 4, 2005

Brown v. … Fichter v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 604 A.2d 433, 437 (Me. 1992) (citation omitted).

Niehoff v. Congress Square Hotel Co.

149 Me. 412 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 14, 1954

Wing v. Wing, 66 Maine, 62.” … Niehoff v. Sahagian, 149 Me. 396 , supra, and Brown v.

United States v. Murdock

99 Me. 258 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 19, 1904

It may be, as suggested by Putnam, J., in American Surety Co. v. Laurenceville Cement Co., 110 Fed. … Moody v. Brown, 34 Maine, 107. Soule never had possession. There was no delivery. Though the plaintiff was ready to supply, somewhat later in the season than he contracted to, he did not supply.

Campbell v. State of Me.

632 F. Supp. 111 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 1, 1985

of Regents v. … Roy v.

Jacobson v. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission

347 A.2d 426 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 12, 1975

The provenience of this dispute may be traced to April 21, 1965, when Henry Jacobson filed an appeal from an award of the Land Damage Board in the Superior Court. 1 On July 12, 1965, Archie and Gloria Curcione, as lessees … Willette v. Umhoeffer, Me., 245 A.2d 540, 542 (1968); Northland Industries, Inc. v. Kennebec Mills Corporation, 161 Me. 455, 459 , 215 A.2d 100, 102 (1965).

Goulandris Bros. v. British Iron & Steel Corp.

36 F. Supp. 827 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 27, 1941

But this argument is disposed of by the cases of Geipel v. Smith, L.R. 7 Q.B. 404, and Rodoconachi v. … Quina Export Co. v.

Gierie v. Mercy Hospital

969 A.2d 944 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 30, 2009

Chrysler Credit Corp. v. … See Coyne v. Peace, 2004 ME 150, ¶ 14 , 863 A.2d 885, 890 . . In Todd v.

Harrington v. Lord

704 A.2d 1211 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 7, 1997

J.) confirming an Award and Determination entered by a Panel of the Fee Arbitration Commission of the Board of Overseers of the Bar in favor of H. Harvey Harrington. … See Jones v. Silsby, 143 Me. 275 , 61 A.2d 117 (1948); Christie v. Dold, 524 N.W.2d 866, 870-71 (S.D.1994) (“An attorney who is employed to probate an estate is not employed by and does not represent the estate.