Case law

Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Federal Express Corp.

402 F.3d 1245 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 8, 2005

Brown. Before: RANDOLPH, TATEL, and GARLAND, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH. … AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers of Am., 475 U.S. 643, 648 (1986), quoting United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574, 582 (1960).

Local 13, Detroit Newspaper Printing & Graphic Communications Union v. National Labor Relations Board

598 F.2d 267 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 9, 1979

Accordingly, we pay great deference to the Board’s decision; and must affirm if it is supported in the record and reasonably based in law. See San Diego Newspaper Guild v. NLRB, 548 F.2d at 867; NLRB v. … The order of the Board is therefore Affirmed. . The opinion and order of the National Labor Relations Board (Board) is reprinted in 233 N.L.R.B. No. 144 (1977). .

Baxley v. Wormuth

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 2024

Board’s interpretation of Army Regulation 600-85 under Kisor v. … Rudo v. McHugh, 931 F. Supp. 2d 132,143 (D.D.C. 2013) (quoting Owings v. Brown, 86 F.3d 1178 (Table) (Fed Cir. 1996)).

Hardy v. Powell

314 F. Supp. 3d 359 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 2018

Nurriddin v. Goldin , 382 F.Supp.2d 79 , 92 (D.D.C. 2005) (citing Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin. , 425 U.S. 820 , 832, 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976) ); see also 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(c). … See, e.g., Powell v. Cohen , 2001 WL 135460 at *1 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 6, 2001) ; Katz v. Glickman , 1998 WL 321191 at *1 (E.E.O.C. June 5, 1998).

Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Committee of Former Northeast Stewardesses, Intervenor

574 F.2d 546 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 20, 1978

It is clear that the Board has the authority to impose conditions on its approval of the merger of air carriers, Kent v. … Outland v. CAB, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 90, 94 , 284 F.2d 224, 228 (1960). In American Airlines, Inc. v.

Southwest Merchandising Corporation D/B/A Handy Andy, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

943 F.2d 1354 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 13, 1991

E.g., Emhart Indus. v. … Neither the AU nor the Board made an express finding to this effect, however. Cf. Local Union 1395, IBEW v. NLRB, 797 F.2d 1027 , 1036 (D.C.Cir.1986).

Cleveland County Ass'n for Government by the People v. Cleveland County Board of Commissioners

965 F. Supp. 72 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 1997

Board of Commissioners v. … As Moore v.

Friendship Edison Public Charter School Collegiate Campus v. Murphy

448 F. Supp. 2d 166 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 6, 2006

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren, 353 F.3d at 39 ; Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . B.

Kretchmar v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

32 F. Supp. 3d 49 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2014

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). “To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter” to. “state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Ashcroft v. … Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 (alterations in original) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Board of Trustees of National Training School for Boys v. O. D. Wilson Co.

133 F.2d 399 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 25, 1943

Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. City of Rochester, 17S U.S. 373, 20 S.Ct. 957 , 44 L.Ed. 1108 ; Alta Elec. & Mech. Co., Inc., v. United States, 90 Ct.Cl. 466 . Hawkins v. United States, 96 U.S. 689 , 24 L.Ed. 607 . … Connolly v. Bouck, 8 Cir., 174 E. 312, certiorari denied 220 U.S. 610 , 31 S.Ct. 714 , 55 L.Ed. 608 ; United States v. White Oak Coal Co., 4 Cir., 5 F.2d 439 ; White Oak Coal Co. v.

International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

273 F.2d 833 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 30, 1959

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 359, 365 , 262 F.2d 456, 462 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … And see National Labor Relations Board v. F. H. McGraw & Co., 206 F.2d 635, 641 (6 Cir.).

Lewis v. Secretary of the Navy

195 F. Supp. 3d 277 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2016

Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Ass’n, __ U.S. __, __, 135 S. Ct. 1199, 1203 (2015) (quoting Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 302–303 (1979) (internal quotation marks omitted)). … That division of labor is impermissible where the statute directs the Secretary to act through the Board itself. Cf. Lipsman, 335 F. Supp. 2d at 53–54; see also Mosley v.

International Organization Of Masters, Mates And Pilots, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

575 F.2d 896 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 1978

See generally 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(E) (1976); NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965); Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). … Alabama, Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 64 , 96 S.Ct. 612 , 46 L.Ed.2d 659 (1976) (per curiam); accord, Elrod v.

Smuck v. Hobson

408 F.2d 175 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 21, 1969

Undoubtedly in the day and time of it, the issuance of the decree seemed essential in light of Brown v. … The Supreme Court then had decided Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 , 74 S.Ct. 693 , 98 L.Ed. 884 and see Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 (1954). . Supra note 4. . 269 F.Supp. at 517 . .

William J. Hewitt v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

404 F.2d 1247 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 6, 1968

Le Vonas v. Acme Paper Board Co., supra, is not meaningful on the assumption of risk since the holding was lack of negligence. A similar explanation disposes of Morrison v. … E. g., Michael v. Stanley, 75 Md. 404 , 23 A. 1094 (1892); Maryland D. & V. Ry. Co. v. Brown, 109 Md. 304 , 71 A. 1005 (1908). . State, Use of Eckhardt v. Lazaretto Guano Co., 90 Md. 177 , 44 A. 1017 (1899); Wood v.

Singleton v. Babbitt

588 F.3d 1078 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 2009

Before: GARLAND, BROWN, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM. … The Board repeated this point in Administrator v.

General Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers, Local Union No. 782 v. National Labor Relations Board

373 F.2d 661 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 7, 1967

Washington, Virginia & Maryland Coach Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 301 U.S. 142 , 57 S.Ct. 648 , 81 L.Ed. 965 (1937); Consolidated Edison Co. et al. v. … Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 492 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 .

John Roy Bourchier v. Merle Van Metre, Captain, United States Navy

223 F.2d 646 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 1955

The findings and sentence were approved by the Board of Review Number six. … Burns v. Wilson, 1953, 346 U.S. 137, 144 , 73 S.Ct. 1045 , 97 L.Ed. 1508 .

Harris v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 689

825 F. Supp. 2d 82 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2011

Supp. 4, 7 (D.D.C. 1997); Local 300, Nat’l Postal Mail Handlers Union v. Nat’l Postal Mail Handlers Union, 764 F. Supp. 199, 206–07 (D.D.C. 1991); see also Brown v. Gino Morena Enters., 44 F. … Titanium Metals Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 392 F.3d 439, 448 (D.C. Cir. 2004); see also Brown, 44 F.

International Chemical Workers Union Local 483 v. National Labor Relations Board, Cabot Corporation, Intervenor

561 F.2d 253 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 19, 1977

Boire v. Greyhound Corp., 376 U.S. 473, 481 , 84 S.Ct. 894 , 11 L.Ed.2d 849 (1964). *256 We look to the terms of the contract and to the actual operations. … We find no reason to dispute the Board’s conclusion.