Case law

Brom v. Newell

15 Or. App. 246 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 5, 1973

Anderson v. Alexander, 191 Or 409 , 229 P2d 633 , 230 P2d 770 (1951); Thompson v. Cupp, 5 Or App 393 , 484 P2d 858 , 29 ALR2d 1051 (1971); State ex rel Gilmore v. … Ball v. Gladden, 250 Or 485 , 443 P2d 621 (1968).

Diamond Fruit Growers v. Goss

120 Or. App. 390 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 19, 1993

Our holding here makes it necessary to modify in part our decision in Bird v. … See Krieger v. Future Logging, 116 Or App 537 , 842 P2d 428 (1992). In Bird v.

Union Fishermen's Co-op. Packing Co. v. Point Adams Packing Co.

108 Or. 535 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1923

Immediately above this scroll and between the head and foot boards of the “bedstead” is embossed in large gilt capitals the word “Salmon,” and underneath is printed in black capitals, “Every Can Guaranteed.” … Co. v. A. Y. McDonaly & Morrison Mfg.

Landers v. Van Aukin

77 Or. 479 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1915

In subdivision 13 it is made the duty of all boards of directors to provide certain conveniences “for each of the schools under their charge,” for which the board may levy a tax without a vote of the taxpayers. … The plaintiffs do not tender anything whatever on this account, and hence under such authorities as Welch v. City of Astoria, 26 Or. 89 ( 37 Pac. 66 ), and Dayton v.

Ricard v. Klamath Falls Forest Estates HOA

328 Or. App. 46 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 13, 2023

Finally, the court concluded: 56 Ricard v. … Eklof v. Steward, 360 Or 717, 730, 385 P3d 1074 (2016); Two Two v. Fujitec America, Inc., 355 Or 319, 325-26, 325 P3d 707 (2014); Woodroffe v. State of Oregon, 292 Or App 21, 27, 422 P3d 381 (2018).

Higley v. Edwards

67 Or. App. 488 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 28, 1984

See Glide School Dist. v. Carell, 39 Or App 727, 732 , 593 P2d 1224 (1979); see also Richardson v. Perales, 402 US 389 , 91 S Ct 1420 , 28 L Ed 2d 842 (1971); Calhoun v. … Black, 251 Or 177, 186 , 444 P2d 929 (1968); see also State v. Middleton, 295 Or 485 , 668 P2d 371 (1983); State v. Green, 271 Or 153 , 531 P2d 245 (1975); State v. Kerstig, 50 Or App 461 , 623 P2d 1095 (1981).

Saylor v. Enterprise Electric Co.

110 Or. 231 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1924

BROWN, J. … Why use a board? “A.

Kirkwood v. Ford

34 Or. 552 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1899

Laws, §§ 2778, 2779 * ; Oregon & Washington Mortgage Savings Bank v. Jordan, 16 Or. 113 ( 17 Pac. 621 ); Oregon & California R. R. Co. v. Lane County, 23 Or. 386 ( 31 Pac. 964 ); Ramp v. … A strict construction should be given said section 2832 (as was intimated in Steel v. Fell, 29 Or. 272, 45 .

Larson v. State Compensation Department

251 Or. 478 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1968

The Board ordered the claim closed. Later, the Board reopened the claim to permit the claimant to file the required written opinion. Thereafter, Lawrence J. … This court held in Coday v.

In Re Hayes' Estate

161 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1938

R. 498. *16 In Brown v. Houston, 114 U. S. 622 , 29 L. Ed. 257 , 5 S. … The period of his ownership was brief, possibly no longer than five days, but in Brown v. Houston, supra, American Steel & Wire Co. v. Speed, supra, General Oil Co. v. Crain, supra, Bacon v.

SAIF Corp. v. Dubose

335 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 2003

In Mabon v. … In Norton v.

Jordan v. SAIF Corp.

197 Or. App. 599 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 16, 2005

See Holmes v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 227 Or 562 , 362 P2d 371 (1961); Verban v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 168 Or 394 , 123 P2d 988 (1942); Chebot v. State Industrial Acc. Commission, 106 Or 660 , 212 P 792 (1923). … See Wausau Ins. v.

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Miller

306 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1988

PER CURIAM Claimant’s employer in this case and claimant in Dunn v. … In an opinion in this case, the majority, over a dissent, held that the Board rule exceeded the scope of its rulemaking authority. Weyerhaeuser Company v. Miller, 88 Or App 286 , 745 P2d 429 (1987).

Beeler v. Foss Launch & Tug Co.

224 F. Supp. 814 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 29, 1963

As Brown reached the deck, the walking boss, believing that Brown would stand by or would hold the ladder, walked away. … Judge Jameson distinguished the facts in that case from Crumady v. Joachim Hendrik Fisser, 1959, 358 U.S. 423 , 79 S.Ct. 445 , 3 L.Ed.2d 413 , and Grillea v.

Kasch's Garden Centers & Nurseries v. Department of Agriculture

85 Or. App. 377 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 6, 1987

See Derenco v. Benjamin Franklin Savings & Loan, 281 Or 533 , 577 P2d 477 (1978). Rule held valid. … The Secretary of Agriculture has not established a quarantine of the brown garden snail.

Delaney v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.

278 Or. 305 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 10, 1977

In Fouchek v. … In Starr v.

Penifold v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

49 Or. App. 1015 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 1980

Buster v. Chase Bag Co., 14 Or App 323 , 513 P2d 504 (1973). Hamilton v. SAIF, 11 Or App 344 , 501 P2d 1007 (1972), rev den (1973); Sahnow v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. … See Brenner v. Industrial Indemnity Co., 30 Or App 69 , 566 P2d 530 (1977); Petersen v. Travelers Insurance., 21 Or App 637 , 536 P2d 448 (1975); Sahnow v. Fireman’s Fund Ins.

Oregon Public Utility Commission v. Employment Department

267 Or. App. 68 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 19, 2014

We review the board’s order “for substantial evidence, substantial reason, and errors of law.” Franklin v. Employment Dept., 254 Or App 656, 657 , 294 P3d 554 (2013). … Employer first argues that certain findings made by the board are not supported by substantial evidence. See Warkentin v.

State v. Jury

185 Or. App. 132 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 20, 2002

State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). If the asserted error satisfies those criteria, we then must exercise our discretion in deciding whether to correct the error. Ailes v. … See, e.g., Ailes, 312 Or at 381-83 ; Brown, 310 Or at 355 .

Perrin v. Kitzhaber

191 Or. App. 439 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 21, 2004

Finally, Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human Resources, 532 US 598 , 121 S Ct 1835 , 149 L Ed 2d 855 (2001), is also instructive. … Del Rio, 67 SW3d 85, 88 (Tex 2001) (when concurrent suits are filed in state and federal court, Growe requires the federal court to defer *444 to the state process); Brown v.