Case law

Corbett v. Picard (In Re Picard)

133 B.R. 1 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · Oct 24, 1991

Tuttle v. Raymond, 494 A.2d 1353 (Me.1985) (quoted verbatim) Id. at 5-6. The issue whether collateral estoppel is applicable to bankruptcy litigation presents a case of first impression in this district. 2 In Brown v. … In Massachusetts v. Hale, 618 F.2d 143 (1st Cir.1980), the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit was presented with this issue but avoided it.

Judkins v. Maine Central Railroad

80 Me. 417 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 18, 1888

He then got down upon the track in front of the car, moving towards him, and grasped a hold upon the front board of the bin which held the coal, the board being near the front of the car, planting his feet upon the brake-beam … Under this rule, it was held in Belair v. Chicago, &c. Ry.

Benedix v. Secretary of State

603 A.2d 473 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 21, 1992

State v. Keith, 595 A.2d 1019, 1021 (Me.1991). … Nothing in State v.

Dissell v. Trans World Airlines

511 A.2d 441 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 19, 1986

Crider v. Zurich Insurance Co., 380 U.S. 39, 41 , 85 S.Ct. 769, 770 , 13 L.Ed.2d 641 (1965). See also Cardillo v. … Neither the agreement nor any other evidence in the record reflects that the agreement was ever approved by the Massachusetts Industrial Accidents Board.

Sawyer v. Calais National Bank

126 Me. 314 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 17, 1927

Myers v. Levenseller, 117 Maine, 82. “It was certainly within the power of the court to vacate the judgment if satisfied that it had been entered erroneously.” Hersey vs. Weeman, 120 Maine, 262. … Defendant relied upon Brown vs. Harris, 52 Am.

Higgins v. Carr Bros.

138 Me. 264 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 25, 1942

Swift & Co. v. United States, 196 U. S., 375 , 25 S. Ct., 276 , 49 Law Ed., 518; Stafford v. Wallace, 258 U. S., 495 , 42 S. Ct., 397 , 66 Law Ed., 735, 23 A. L. R., 229; Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. … Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, supra. See Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin S. Corp., 301 U. S. *270 1, 29 , 57 S. Ct., 615 , 81 Law Ed., 893; Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 298 U. S., 238, 309 , 56 S.

Ullis v. Inhabitants of Town of Boothbay Harbor

459 A.2d 153 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 13, 1983

In Schwanda v. … Norfolk v.

Astrowsky v. First Portland Mortg. Corp., Inc.

887 F. Supp. 332 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 2, 1995

Bostick v. Rappleyea, 629 F.Supp. 1328, 1334 (N.D.N.Y.1985) (quoting Spirt v. … Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1122 (3d Cir.1982) (case arises under the National Labor Relations Act); N.L.R.B. v.

Maine Ass'n of Interdependent Neighborhoods v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human Services

732 F. Supp. 248 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 1, 1990

Id. at 842-43, n. 9 , 104 S.Ct. at 2781, n. 9 ; National Labor Relations Board v. United Food & Commercial Workers, 484 U.S. 112, 123 , 108 S.Ct. 413, 420 , 98 L.Ed.2d 429 (1987). … See, e.g., Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. Wichita Board of Trade, 412 U.S. 800, 808 , 93 S.Ct. 2367, 2375 , 37 L.Ed.2d 350 (1973); American Trucking Association v.

Inh. of the Town of W. Bath v. Reg'l Sch. Unit 1

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 17, 2014

See Hodgdon v. … Likewise, the decision in Berry v.

Keyes Fibre Co. v. Chaplin Corp.

97 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, D. Maine · May 8, 1951

Hoover v. … Coe is authority for the proposition that the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has jurisdiction to consider a bill in equity to review an action of the Board of Patent Appeals, where the Board has

Haskell v. Inhabitants of Knox

3 Me. 445 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1825

The case of Wood v. Waterville, cited by the counsel for the plaintiff, was decided upon the eighth section of the statute of Massachusetts of 1786, ch. 81. … Their omission not only renders the case of Wood v.

Savage v. Holyoke

59 Me. 345 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1871

Moore v. Moore, 21 Me. 354 ; Chandler v. Walker, 1 Fost. 286 ; 1 Chit. Pl. 196 and 199. … Brown v. Veazie, 25 Me. 362 ; 2 Washb. Real. Prop. 522.

New Maine National Bank v. Gendron

780 F. Supp. 52 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 18, 1991

See, e.g., Brown v. National Permanent Federal Savings and Loan Association, 683 F.2d 444, 447 (D.C.Cir.1982); Etta v. Seaboard Enterprises, Inc., 674 F.2d 913, 919 (D.C.Cir. 1982). In Brown , the D.C. … .’’); Mitchell v.

Austin v. Town of Dexter

522 F. Supp. 2d 38 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 8, 2008

Clarke v. … In Demmons v.

State v. Smith

256 A.2d 580 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 29, 1969

See, Smith v. Speers, Opinion May 22, 1969, Me., 253 A.2d 701 . … State v. Allen, 1967, Me., 235 A.2d 529 .

Niehoff v. Congress Square Hotel Co.

149 Me. 412 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 14, 1954

Wing v. Wing, 66 Maine, 62.” … Niehoff v. Sahagian, 149 Me. 396 , supra, and Brown v.

United States v. Murdock

99 Me. 258 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 19, 1904

It may be, as suggested by Putnam, J., in American Surety Co. v. Laurenceville Cement Co., 110 Fed. … Moody v. Brown, 34 Maine, 107. Soule never had possession. There was no delivery. Though the plaintiff was ready to supply, somewhat later in the season than he contracted to, he did not supply.

City of Lewiston v. Androscoggin County

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 21, 2016

V § 5.5.3 (Aug. 14, 2013). … If the Commissioners are being sued in their official capacity, "[s]uits against employees in their official capacities are essentially suits against the government entities for which they work . ... " Brown v.

Lee v. Scotia Prince Cruises Ltd.

828 A.2d 210 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 17, 2003

At the same time, Lee entered into a bonus agreement that authorized Lee to receive annual bonuses, at the discretion of the Board, until the expiration of his employment contract. … Evid. 403 and 608, State v. Robinson, 2002 ME 136, ¶ 11 , 803 A.2d 452, 457 ; State v.