Case law

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

344 F.2d 171 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 28, 1965

Its ensuing order against the Company, however, had been denied enforcement in Cross Company v. NLRB, 286 F.2d 799 (6th Cir. 1961). … excluded from returning to or remaining at work that, notwithstanding the absence of anti-union animus, the Company’s application of the “three day rule” was an improper penalty for protected activity, relying upon NLRB v.

Klayman v. Porter

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 6, 2026

Brown v. FBI, 873 F. Supp. 2d 388, 408 (D.D.C. 2012) (citing Wasserman v. Rodacker, No. 06- cv-1005 (RWR), 2007 WL 2071649, at *7 (D.D.C. July 18, 2007)). … See Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497, 498–99 (1954), supplemented sub nom. Brown v.

Board of Water, Light and Sinking Fund Commissioners v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

931 F.2d 94 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 26, 1991

GINSBURG, Circuit Judge: The Board of Water, Light and Sinking Fund Commissioners of the City of Dalton, Georgia (hereinafter “Dalton”) challenged before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission certain of the costs included … In support of its position that Dalton may challenge the propriety of Southern Natural’s passing the minimum bill payments through its PGA in a § 4 rate case, the Commission relies upon Associated Gas Distributors v.

Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Federal Express Corp.

402 F.3d 1245 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 8, 2005

Brown. Before: RANDOLPH, TATEL, and GARLAND, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH. … AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers of Am., 475 U.S. 643, 648 (1986), quoting United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574, 582 (1960).

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 480, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

413 F.2d 1085 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 16, 1969

In Electrical Workers v. … The Court also quoted from N.L.R.B. v. Local 294, Int.

District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board v. Fraternal Order of Police/Metropolitan Police Department Labor Committee

987 A.2d 1205 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 2010

Just as “Congress [has] declared a national policy favoring arbitration,” District of Columbia v. Greene, 806 A.2d 216, 221 (D.C.2002) (quoting Southland Corp. v. … (citations omitted); see also Cheek v.

Dillard v. Yeldell

334 A.2d 578 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1975

Bollotin v. Workmen Service Co., 128 Cal.App.2d 339 , 275 P.2d 599 (1954); Bragassa v. Bragassa, supra note 5 ; Board of Educ. v. Fowler, supra note 5; Linden v. … Whorton v. Gaspard, supra note 6 ; State v. Groff, supra note 10 ; Keigley v. Bench, supra note 10 . 28 . Board of Pub. Util. Comm’rs v.

Beberman v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 3, 2025

Beberman v. … Amobi v. Brown, 317 F. Supp. 3d 29, 35–36 (D.D.C. 2018). Doing so for these “facts on the public record” is permissible when deciding “a motion to dismiss.” Covad Cmmc’ns Co. v. Bell Atl.

Noble v. United States Parole Commission

194 F.3d 152 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 5, 1999

Board of Parole to the U.S. Parole Commission. See National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-33, s 11231(a)(1), 111 Stat. 712, 745; Franklin v. … See Tyler v.

Teamsters Local Union No. 171 v. National Labor Relations Board

863 F.2d 946 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 9, 1988

See Southwest Regional Joint Bd. v. … See NLRB v.

Continental Resources, Inc. v. Jewell

134 F. Supp. 3d 231 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2015

In *235 Adams Fruit Co., Inc. v. … (citing Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984). Given the Court’s analysis above, the Court does not agree that equitable tolling is appropriate in this case.

Neely v. Blumenthal

458 F. Supp. 945 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 6, 1978

Brown v. General Services Administration, 507 F.2d 1300, 1307 (2d Cir. 1974). … Brown, supra, 507 F.2d at 1303. 13 . See also United States v.

National Geographic Society v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

721 A.2d 618 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 1998

Brown argues that this court should give deference to the agency’s reasonable interpretation of the statute it administers. See Lee v. … Co. v.

Local No. 150, International Union of Operating Engineers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

480 F.2d 1186 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 1973

No. 135 (members Fanning and Brown dissenting). We conclude that the Board’s order is premised upon an erroneous construction of the Act. … See N.L.R.B. v. Irving and McKelvy, 475 F.2d 1265 (3 Cir., 1973).

Knop v. MacKall

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 6, 2009

Johnson-Brown v. M. St. LLC, 257 F. Supp. 2d 175,177 (D.D.C. 2003) (citing Univ. of S. Ala. v. Am. Tobacco Co., 168 F.3d 405, 411 (11th Cir. 1999)). … Johnson-Brown, 257 F. Supp. 2d at 181 (citing Garcir, 254 F.3d at 588); see Garbie v.

Mary Chambers v. DC (EN BANC)

35 F.4th 870 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 2022

Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education, 544 U.S. 167, 174 (2005). … In Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446 (D.C.

United States Ex Rel. McBride v. Halliburton Co.

44 F. Supp. 3d 69 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 27, 2014

1:05-CV-828 (FJS/JMF) HALLIBURTON COMPANY, KELLOGG BROWN AND ROOT, also known as KBR; SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL; KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INCORPORATED … He recalled no discussion at the Task Order 59 award fee board proceedings about MWR patronage or staffing and has no reason to believe that these issues affected the award fee evaluation board's determination.

Building Service Employees International Union Local 32-J, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

313 F.2d 880 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 24, 1963

In Seafarers International Union, etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 105 U.S. … Bro. of Teamsters, etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 105 U.S.

Mid-Nebraska Bancshares, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

627 F.2d 266 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 1980

Id. at 190 , 88 S.Ct. at 2047 , quoted in United States v. … See Board of Gov. of FRS v. First Lincolnwood Corp., 439 U.S. at 238 n.4, 99 S.Ct. 508 n.4. 7 .

United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board (Holding Company Reorganizations), Tiger International, Inc., a Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics Board, (Two Cases). United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Braniff International Corporation, a Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics Board

569 F.2d 640 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 1978

CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent (two cases). UNITED AIR LINES, INC., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. BRANIFF INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a corporation, et al., Petitioners, v. … v.