Case law

State v. White

168 P.3d 459 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Oct 4, 2007

The record clearly shows that Mr. White had an open invitation for which he was neither required nor expected to inform his mother or Mr. … Deputy Artz was clearly investigating.

Farmer v. Navient Solutions, LLC (In re Farmer)

567 B.R. 895 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · May 4, 2017

The Bankruptcy Code clearly categorizes such claims as core matters. 28 U.S.C. § 157 (b)(2)(I). Navient presents no argument to the contrary. … This proceeding involves only the question of whether the Loan qualifies as the type of loan described in , subsection (a)(8).

State v. Downing

93 P.3d 900 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jul 20, 2004

But the Court held that Lee's conduct did not qualify. … Nor does this case fall squarely under the permissive joinder cases, where the conduct is clearly not the same. See, e.g., State v.

Friends of Moon Creek v. Diamond Lake Improvement Association Inc

District Court, E.D. Washington · Jun 10, 2020

Defendant Sharon Sorby appealed the December 1, 2016 Order 15 finding that she did not have qualified immunity and that her Notice did not comply 16 with state law. … On February 6, 2018, Division III of the Court of Appeals found that 17 Defendant Sharon Sorby did have qualified immunity and her Notice was sufficient 18 under state law, and remanded the case with instructions to

Michael Segaline v. Dept. Of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington · May 21, 2013

The court ruled in the alternative that Croft was entitled to qualified immunity. L I moved for summaryjudgment on Segaline's remaining claims. … Segaline has established a prima facie case of lack of probable cause by showing that the prosecution terminated in his favor. Rodriguez v. City ofMoses Lake, 158 Wn.

American Waterways Operators, Resp v. Pollution Control Hearings Board,et Al, App

435 P.3d 856 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 5, 2019

An “‘[o]rder,’ without further qualification, means a written statement of particular applicability that finally determines the legal rights, duties, privileges, immunities, or other legal interests of a specific person … But the legislature has clearly limited the Board’s authority to hear appeals to adjudicative proceedings. RCW 43.21B.160. And adjudicative proceedings concern specific rights of specific parties.

State v. Kirkman

159 Wash. 2d 918 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 5, 2007

Stirling’s testimony as “clearly” an improper opinion implying Kirkman’s guilt. Dr. … After establishing that there was no physical evidence of sexual contact, the State asked Dr.

Center For Biological Diversity, App v. Dept. Of Fish And Wildlife, Resps

Court of Appeals of Washington · Oct 27, 2020

This statute clearly contemplates a legal agency relationship. … A nonprofit organization is a qualified party under the EAJA.25 RCW 4.84.340(5). 25 “Qualified party” means in part “[A]n organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the federal internal revenue code of 1954 as

Schultheis v. Nash

27 Wash. 250 · Washington Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1902

Martha Schultheis was appointed general guardian of her infant son, Arthur Kornetsky, hy the superior court of Lincoln county, and qualified as such guardian. … Dormitzer.” *253 Thereafter Nash & Nash brought an action against the estate of Rudolph Gorkow, deceased, which was conducted through the superior and supreme courts, and the rights of said minor in said estate were established

State v. Copeland

130 Wash. 2d 244 · Washington Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1996

"If there is a significant dispute between qualified experts as to the validity of scientific evidence, it may not be admitted.” Id. at 887 . … Other testimony by Henry was clearly in response to new matters.

Grayson v. Curtis Publishing Co.

72 Wash. 2d 999 · Washington Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1967

In addition, Curtis pleaded the defenses of substantial truth, fair comment, qualified privilege, good faith, and the absolute protection of the First Amendment as guaranteeing freedom of the press in the absence of malicious … abrupt departure from existing rules of libel, would be applicable to public officials only, that is, only to persons holding what could fairly be called a public office, who, possibly through their office, enjoyed certain immunities

State v. Lewis

Washington Supreme Court · Jul 17, 2025

To limit judicial discretion, the SRA establishes standard sentencing ranges based on the seriousness of the crime and the offender score of the defendant. RCW 9.94A.010; 9.94A.510-.533. … Morley to determine whether courts-martial qualified as convictions for the purpose of the offender score, we treated the offender score as though it included all convictions within the definition of “criminal history,

Washington Recorder Publishing Co. v. Ernst

199 Wash. 176 · Washington Supreme Court · May 24, 1939

I will also deliver free of charge complimentries and a reasonable number of sample copies of The Daily Olympian. “ (11) It is clearly understood that I am not an employe of The Daily Olympian. … (iii), in which subdivision there is nothing to disclose that the individual must sell products of, or perform service for, third persons in order to qualify as an independent contractor.

American States Insurance v. Symes of Silverdale, Inc.

111 Wash. App. 477 · Court of Appeals of Washington · May 3, 2002

Idaho 2001) (casualty insurance policy itself and its proceeds qualify as property of the estate). … The court clearly stated in Ellwein , “Insureds must prove bad faith as a matter of law.” Ellwein, 142 Wn.2d at 775-76 .

Herring v. DEPT. OF SOC. AND HEALTH SERV.

914 P.2d 67 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 29, 1996

The SSI facilitator position was established in 1987 to assist Washington state residents receiving General Assistance Unemployable benefits (GAU) to successfully apply for SSI benefits. … An appellate court will only overturn a jury verdict if it is "clearly unsupported by substantial *77 evidence." Burnside v. Simpson, 123 Wash.2d 93, 107-08 , 864 P.2d 937 (1994); Adcox v.

Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.

120 Wash. App. 784 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 22, 2004

Under the established rules for contract interpretation, we are constrained to agree. … The parties’ declaration makes no mention of the marketplace, however, and the agreement clearly permits either party to terminate the agreement and escape a losing enterprise.

Jon L. Wilkerson v. City Of Seatac

Court of Appeals of Washington · Nov 5, 2012

This is something that Jon obviously did not notice or appreciate and which clearly had an impact on his ability to make the jump. The court granted the motion for partial summary judgment. … To establish the City was not immune from suit under RCW 4.24.210, Wilkerson must show the City charged a fee for the use of the land, the injuries were intentionally inflicted, or the injuries were sustained by reason

Ketcham v. King County Medical Service Corp.

81 Wash. 2d 565 · Washington Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1972

Decker, 52 Wn.2d 456, 464-65 , 326 P.2d 332 (1958), this court established the relation of U.S. … The new act is an addition to an already established area of regulated public activity.

State v. White

141 Wash. App. 128 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Oct 4, 2007

The record clearly shows that Mr. White had an open invitation for which he was neither required nor expected to inform his mother or Mr. … Deputy Artz was clearly investi *143 gating.

United States v. Washington

384 F. Supp. 312 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Feb 12, 1974

The fishing right was reserved by the Indians and cannot be qualified by the state. … To qualify for self-regulation of off reservation treaty right fishing as above provided, a tribe must establish to the satisfaction of either Fisheries and Game or the court, that the tribe has each of the following qualifications