Case law

STATE EX REL. ENGWEILER v. Cook

197 Or. App. 32 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 12, 2005

See State ex rel Osborne v. … See State ex rel Ricco v.

Evanite Fiber Corp. v. Striplin

99 Or. App. 353 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 8, 1989

Katzenbach, 307 Or 391 , 768 P2d 395 (1989), employer argues that the Board erred in relying on Guerrero v. … Webb v. SAIF, 83 Or App 386 , 731 P2d 1054 (1987); Roller v.

Compton v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

301 Or. 641 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1986

In Mansfield v. … In Maumary v.

Evjen v. Employment Division

22 Or. App. 372 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 25, 1975

Claimant appeals from an order of the Employment Appeals Board denying him unemployment compensation. The issue in this case, as was the situation in Minniti v. … “In affirming a decision of the Board denying benefits to a student attending Lane Community College, this court noted in Callaghan v.

State v. Snow

179 Or. App. 222 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 30, 2002

Brown, 301 Or at 277 . … Brown, 301 Or at 277 . Similarly, in State v.

Burns v. Newell

12 Or. App. 621 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 12, 1973

Gibbs v. … Both opinions in Fredericks v.

Gordon v. Hill

189 Or. App. 363 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 10, 2003

In reaching that conclusion, the board specifically relied on our decisions in Weidner v. Armenakis, 154 Or App 12 , 959 *366 P2d 623, dismissed by order July 13, 1998, reasoning readopted and reaffirmed in Merrill v. … See, e.g., McGee v.

Walker v. Oregon Travel Information Council

299 Or. App. 432 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 18, 2019

Brown v. J. C. … See Miller v.

State v. Martin

260 Or. App. 461 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 2, 2014

See State v. … Brown, 31 Or App at 508 . We applied similar reasoning in State v.

Clatsop County v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

96 Or. 2 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1920

In Pacific Wood & Coal Co. v. … With a boarding camp. “Q. What is the necessity of a boarding camp around camps of that kind? “A.

Wattenbarger v. Boise Cascade Corp.

300 Or. 12 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1986

Charles Wattenbarger, Petitioner On Review, v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Respondent On Review. TC 135,549; CA A32736; SC S32364. Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued and Submitted April 3, 1986. … circumstances of the individual case must predominate and the guidelines will be used only to the extent that their intrinsic persuasiveness assists the court in its independent assessment function," citing generally, Harwell v.

State v. Link

297 Or. App. 126 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 17, 2019

See, e.g. , Wille v. Board of Parole , 287 Or. … Board of Parole , 287 Or.

State v. Lewis

19 Or. 478 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1890

They are all resolvable into a single question, and that is, whether or not it was competent for the State to rely for conviction upon the evidence given by the witness Brown in relation to other emheLzloEaents than the particular … Ev., § 46; Mayer v. People, 80 N. Y. 364 ; Shipply v. People, 86 id. 375; 40 Am. Rep. 551 ; Pinckard v. State, 13 Tex. App. 468; Com. v. Shepard, 1 Allen, 575 . In Commonwealth v.

Vanderzanden v. Lowell School District No. 71

369 F. Supp. 67 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 5, 1973

Karp v. Becken, 477 F.2d 171, 174 (1973); see also Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sinderman, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); Hayes v. Cape Henlopen School Dist., supra.

Kotan v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 110C

13 Or. App. 139 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 23, 1973

Carr, who had already been appointed principal by the board in her stead, that she teach a specific class. In Prime v. … Corp. v.

Smith v. Department of Corrections

251 Or. App. 775 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 22, 2012

Smith v. Board of Parole, 250 Or App 345 , 284 P3d 1150 (2012) (Smith I). In the present case, petitioner challenges a different notice from a different agency, also regarding inmate hearing rights, for the same reason. … In Smith v.

Adams v. Clements

183 Or. App. 207 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 7, 2002

Intervenors have appealed, and the initial question on appeal is whether the fact that petitioner could have sought judicial review of the Board’s order precludes him from seeking habeas. See Tiner v. … Gage v. Maass, 306 Or 196, 204 , 759 P2d 1049 (1988). Here, ORS 144.335(1) permits petitioner to seek judicial review of the Board’s action and is an adequate alternative remedy. Cf. Frady v.

Overton v. Benton County

61 Or. App. 667 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 16, 1983

See Bryant v. Clackamas County, 56 or App 442, 643 P2d 649 (1982). … See, e.g., Benton County v. Friends of Benton County, 294 Or 79 , 653 P2d 1249 (1982) (construing analogous statute); Merrill v. Van Volkinburg, 54 Or App 873 , 636 P2d 466 (1981) (construing analogous statute).

Williams v. State Accident Insurance Fund

31 Or. App. 1301 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 27, 1977

Holden v. Willamette Industries, 28 Or App 613, 618 , 560 P2d 298 (1977). … Wingfield v. National Biscuit Co., 8 Or App 408, 413 , 494 P2d 905 (1972).

Saif Corp. v. Bryant

173 Or. App. 402 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 4, 2001

We explained in SAIF v. … See Skochenko v.