Case law

Summey v. Tisdale

658 P.2d 464 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1982

Our decision in Neel v. Board of County Commissioners of Cherokee County, Okl., 617 P.2d 201 [1980] is not applicable here. The controversy in Neel centered around a budget request for the 1977-1978 fiscal year. … Nixon v. Roberts, Okl., 420 P.2d 898, 903 [1966], 27 .Board of County Commissioners of Nowata County v. Price, Okl., 385 P.2d 479, 482 [1963]; Nixon v. Roberts, supra note 26.

Dickinson v. Blackwood

76 Okla. 175 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1919

Co. v. … Co. v.

Cochran v. Norris

175 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1935

Counsel has failed to cite any authorities on this question, Out this court, in Board of County Commissioners of Garvin County et al. v. … Rep. 249 ; McIndoo v. Brown et al., 125 Okla. 88 , 256 P. 743 ; Whitehead v. Stephens, 54 Okla. 337 , 152 P. 445 ; Power & Irrigation Co. of Clearlake v. Capay Ditch Co., 226 Fed. 634 ; Levy v.

State v. Bridwell

592 P.2d 520 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 20, 1979

E. g., Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. Litton, 315 P.2d 239 (Okl.1957); Summerour v. Cartrett, 220 Ga. 31 , 136 S.E.2d 724 (1964); Sportservice Corp. v. … Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. State Board of Education, 197 Okl. 141 , 169 P.2d 295 (1946); Richards v. U.

Polan v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 19, 2021

) CIV-20-1236-R ) THE BOARD OF REGENTS ) OF … No. 7) filed by Defendant, the Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma (“the University”). Plaintiff responded in opposition to the motion and Defendant filed reply in support of its position. (Doc.

Halladay v. BD. OF OKMULGEE COUNTY COM'RS

75 O.B.A.J. 1521 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 16, 2004

Carmichael v. Better, 1996 OK 48, ¶ 2 , 914 P.2d 1051, 1053 . … The Court adopted the rule in Woody v. State ex rel. Dept. of Corrections, 1992 OK 45 , 833 P.2d 257 , citing the United States Supreme Court case of Houston v.

Robinson v. State

489 P.2d 1087 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1971

Han-lon identified Exhibit One as slacks from the merchandise in stock at Brown’s worth over $90.00. … Turner v. State, Okl.Cr., 479 P.2d 631 . The final proposition asserts that the punishment is excessive.

Coulter v. State

721 P.2d 818 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1986

Charlie Brown, the assistant manager of the store, was called to assist Mr. Johnson. Mr. … Nauni v. State, 670 P.2d 126 (Okl.Cr.1983). Only where evidence has been introduced which may tend to support the proposed theory will the trial court be under an obligation to instruct on that theory. Carter v.

Ridinger v. State

97 Okla. Crim. 377 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 1953

See, also, many other cases which support these rules of law, including Gorum v. State, 60 Okla. Cr. 248 , 63 P. 2d 765 ; Edwards v. State, 46 Okla. Cr. 77 , 288 P. 359 ; Brown v. State, 9 Okla. … Cr. 382 , 132 P. 359 ; Choate v. State, 12 Okla. Cr. 560 , 160 P. 34 , L.R.A. 1917A, 1287 ; Leeks v. State, 95 Okla. Cr. 326 , 245 P. 2d 764, 765 . In Leeks v.

Appeal of National Bank of Tulsa

312 P.2d 495 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1957

Co. v. … Thereunder, the same presumption of correctness was accorded the deci *500 sion of the board, McBirney v.

Bonaparte v. Nelson

142 Okla. 54 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1929

Davis, 53 Okla. 332 , 156 Pac. 213 ; Board of County Com’rs of Garfield County v. Field, 63 Okla. 80 , 162 Pac. 733 ; Garrett v. State, 113 Okla. 63 , 238 Pac. 846 ; Williamson-Halsell-Frazier Co. v. … Becker v. Malheur Co. (Ore.) 33 Pac. 543 ; Vaughn v. School District (Ore.) 39 Pac. 393 ; The People of the State, etc., v. Eureka Lake and Yuba Canal Co. et al., 48 Cal. 143 ; Kansas City, F. S. & G. R. Co. v.

Humphrey v. Denney

757 P.2d 833 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1988

After the Board had received budget requests from all county agencies, it became obvious to the Board that the requests exceeded the revenues available. … Hess v. Excise Board of McCurtain County, Okl., 698 P.2d 930 (1985). We presume the legislature intended what it expressed in a statute and the plain language of a statute will be followed without further inquiry.

Capshaw v. State

69 Okla. Crim. 440 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1940

Code, §§ 31 and 971; People v. Bartol, 24 Cal. App. 659 , 142 P. 510 ; People v. Horn, 25 Cal. App. 583 , 144 P. 641 ; Bishop v. State, 118 Ga. 799 , 45 S. E. 614 .” In the case of White v. State, 43 Ga. … Cherry v. State, 33 Okla. Cr. 37 , 241 P. 833 ; Blakemore v. State, 39 Okla. Cr. 355 , 265 P. 152 ; Boggess v. State, 46 Okla. Cr. 283 , 287 P. 764 .

Prince Co. v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.

110 Okla. 141 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 26, 1925

Emeric v. Alvarado (Cal.) 2 Pac. 418 . "A tax cannot bo mp sed i.vithont fix'nv the rate.” State v. Board of Examiners (Mont.) 104 Pac. 1055 . … Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. West, Atty.

State Ex Rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. Sparks

208 Okla. 150 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1953

Conaway v. Thomas, 101 Okla. 227 , 224 P. 965 , and Brown et al. v. Leslie, Rec., 192 Okla. 43 , 133 P. 2d 551 . This equitable principle is aptly expressed in 49 Am. … State v. Board of Com’rs, 101 Ind. 69, 74 .

Sample v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety

382 P.3d 505 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 2016

See, Muratore, 2014 OK 3, ¶ 20 , 320 P.3d at 1033-1034 1 ; Charlson v. State ex rel. Dept. of Public Safety, 2005 OK 83, ¶ 7 , 125 P.3d 672 , 674-675 2 ; Ward v. … State ex rel Dept. of Public Safety, 2004 OK CIV APP 68, ¶ 7 , 98 P.3d 362 , 364 3 ; M cCown v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety, 2003 OK CIV APP 66, ¶ 10 , 74 P.3d 623 , 626 4 ; Manning v. State ex rel.

Williamson v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 4, 2019

Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 149 n.3 (1984). … Brown v. LaFerry’s LP Gas Co., Inc., 708 F. App’x 518, 520 (10th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Dover v. W.H. Braum, Inc.

76 O.B.A.J. 953 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 2005

Essentially, plaintiff argues that the black ice was not open and obvious and that under Brown v. … Buck v.

Consolidated School District No. 1 v. Wright

128 Okla. 193 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1927

In the case of Dick v. Board of Education (Mo.) 21 A. L. R. 1327, 238 S. … Even under the New York rule the members of the board individually would not be held. Bassett v. Fish, 75 N. Y. 303 ; Herman v. Board, 234 N. Y. 196 , 137 N.

Sequoyah County v. Helms, County Treasurer

40 Okla. 565 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 1914

Board of County Commissioners, plaintiff in error, v. Lee Helms, County Treasurer, Defendant in Error.” … As has been held in 'the case of County of Kingfisher v.