Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

0.89s

  • Fairmount Hospital, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    123 N.J.L. 201 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 22, 1939

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • BROWN v. 1199J UNION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 16, 2023

    Lingle v. … Vaca v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • City of Newark v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    15 N.J. Misc. 368 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 15, 1937

    The proceedings before the board were initiated by the city of Hoboken. The board has jurisdiction of the subject-matter. West Orange v. State Board of Tax *369 Appeals, 115 N. J. L. 396; 180 Atl. … City of Plainfield v. McGrath, 117 N. J. L. 348; 188 Atl. Rep. 733 . We see no reason for following another course. The application is denied, with costs to the appearing respondents above named.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees of Mercer County Community College v. Sypek

    160 N.J. Super. 452 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 21, 1978

    Super. 1, at 4, 5 (Law Div. 1977)] The Board of Trustees of Mereer County Community College (plaintiff) filed a complaint against the county executive of Mercer County and the board of chosen freeholders (board) of that county … Union Cty. v. State, supra. (2) County welfare boards, established pursuant to N. J. S.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Board of Chosen Freeholders v. President of State Bank

    38 N.J. Eq. 36 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1884

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

    83 N.J. Eq. 589 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 29, 1914

    Geiepin, V. O. … In the case of Mayor, &c., of Newark v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hackensack Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    61 N.J. Super. 457 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 24, 1960

    Hackensack Water Company (Hackensack) appeals from a decision of the Board of Public Utility Commissioners (the Board) allowing a credit to it for the payment of 55.6% of the total operating charges of DeEorest Lake Reservoir … Consistent with the above referred to remand, the Board afforded the parties an opportunity for a further hearing.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hudson & Manhattan Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    16 N.J. Super. 396 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 30, 1951

    I concur in the reversal of the order of the Board, but I cannot agree with the direc *403 lion that the Board conduct a rehearing at which a rate base may be proved. … Whether the Company also proved that its proposed rate was reasonable and fair should be determined in the first instance by the Board.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    90 N.J.L. 331 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1917

    The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the case of Peoples Bank and Trust Co. v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, decided at this term (ante p. 171).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bergen County Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

    98 N.J.L. 858 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 4, 1923

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Elizabeth v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    99 N.J.L. 496 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 18, 1924

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

    98 N.J.L. 274 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1922

    The judgment under "review herein will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. … State Board of Taxes and Assessment et al., No. 45, of the present term of this court (post p. 283).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Storage Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

    98 N.J.L. 280 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1922

    The judgment under review herein will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. … State Board of Taxes and Assessment et al., No. 45 of the present term of this court (post p. 283). For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, White, Williams,.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Wrocklage v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    134 N.J.L. 373 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 25, 1946

    Upon the filing of the aforesaid certificate, the county treasurer and the Board of Freeholders of Bergen County determined that relator was “not eligible for retirement or a pension at this time due to the fact that the

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rankin v. Board of Education of Egg Harbor Twp.

    134 N.J.L. 342 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 10, 1946

    See Hahn Motor Truck Corp. v. Atlantic City, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 234; Peter’s Garage v. Burlington County, 121 N. J. L. 523; affirmed, 123 Id. 227. It is perhaps true that the wording of R. … Hammonton v. Elvins, 101 Id. 38, 41. The statutory requirements may not be designed to be all-inclusive.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • West Shore Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    112 N.J.L. 83 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 5, 1934

    The question before the Supreme Court was whether, to quote the language of the opinion of that court, the board in adopting the crossing plan called “P-5 revised” instead of plan “B-2,” made a determination not reasonably

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Newark v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    129 N.J.L. 162 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 15, 1942

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Phillipsburg Transit Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

    99 N.J.L. 319 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 25, 1924

    This writ brings up for review a judgment of the state board of taxes and assessment of the State of New Jersey (hereinafter referred to as the board), rendered in the following circumstances: On February 17th, 1922, the … Phillipsburg Railroad Co. v. Board of Assessors, 82 N. J. L. 49.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lehigh Valley Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

    105 N.J.L. 349 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 4, 1929

    The tax was assessed by the state board of taxes and assessment under authority conferred upon it by the provisions of the Eailroad Tax act of 1888 {Comp.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Ass'n v. Board of Education

    3 N.J. Misc. 660 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 3, 1925

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.