Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

1.48s

  • Brice v. ROBERTSON HOUSE MOVING, WRECKING & S. CO.

    249 N.C. 74 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 29, 1958

    Blevins v. Teer, 220 N.C. 135 , 16 S.E. 2d 659 ; Rankin v. Brown Mfg. Co., 212 N.C. 357 , 193 S.E. 389 . … Key v. Board of Education, 170 N.C. 123 , 86 S.E. 1002 ; Harris v. Board of Education, 216 N.C. 147 , 4 S.E.2d 328 ; Russ v. Woodard, 232 N.C. 36 , 59 S.E.2d 351 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • De Luca v. Stein

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 15, 2020

    COA17-1374-2 Filed: 15 December 2020 Wake County, No. 16 CVS 12965 THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Plaintiffs, v. … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hemphill v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 12, 2024

    FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY During the 2021-2022 school year, Plaintiff was employed by the Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education (the “Board”) as a behavioral modification technician (“ … Even if Plaintiff had alleged a federal right, he fails to allege that the Board’s actions were arbitrary in a constitutional sense.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Carolina Medicorp, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of North Carolina Teachers' & State Employees' Comprehensive Major Medical Plan

    118 N.C. App. 485 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1995

    Petitioners rely on States’ Rights Democratic Party v. … Redevelopment Com’n of Greenville v. *493 Hannaford, 29 N.C. App. 1, 4 , 222 S.E.2d 752, 754 (1976). See Brooks v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State v. Woods

    146 N.C. App. 686 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 6, 2001

    City of Raleigh Board of Adjustment, 140 N.C. App. 784 , 538 S.E.2d 621 (2000) (quoting Kirkpatrick v. Village Council, 138 N.C. App. 79, 86 , 530 S.E.2d 338, 343 (2000)). … Further, in United States v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education, 902 F.2d 267 (M.D.N.C. 1990), the U.S.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Womble v. . Commissioners of Wake

    74 N.C. 421 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

    The question has been considered more at large at this term in D vis v. Commissioners of Stokes County, and in Daniel v. The Commissioners of Edgecombe County. There is no error. Pee Cueiam. Judgment affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Patterson

    209 N.C. App. 708 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 1, 2011

    Brown, who helped stabilize Defendant with a cervical collar and a spine board, testified that he detected a heavy odor of alcohol coming from Defendant and heard Defendant repeatedly state, “I wasn’t driving.” … Likewise, in State v. Oldham, 10 N.C.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Commissioners v. . Wall

    117 N.C. 378 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1895

    Vest v. Cooper , 75 N.C. 519 . … Cited: Board of Education v. Wall, post , 383; Williamson v. Jones , 127 N.C. 180 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Black

    490 F. Supp. 2d 630 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 5, 2007

    Brown. Id. at 64. Dr. … Brown gave money to Black. Id. at 70.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Cabarrus Cty. Bd. of Educ. v. Dep't of State Treasurer

    261 N.C. App. 325 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 2018

    Wilson; and North Carolina School Boards Association, by Legal Counsel Allison Brown Schafer, for North Carolina School Boards Association, amicus curiae. … V.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Marion v. Town of Pilot Mountain

    170 N.C. 118 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1915

    Raleigh v. Peace, 110 N. C., 32 , and other cases. … In Kinston v. Loftin, 149 N. C., 256 , Hoke, J., says, quoting from Davidson v. New Orleans, 96 U.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina v. United States Department of Labor

    722 F. Supp. 1301 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 14, 1989

    Peel v. Florida Department of Transportation, 600 F.2d 1070 (5th Cir.1979), cited with approval in United States v. Onslow County Board of Education, 728 F.2d 628, 639 (4th Cir.1984). … This argument is based on Garcia v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Barefoot v. Durham Cnty.

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 18, 2026

    See Brown v. City of Winston- Salem, 171 N.C. App. 266, 270, 614 S.E.2d 599, 602 (2005). … The County contends the Board’s prior application of the UDO “is entitled to great consideration[,]” citing MacPherson v. Asheville, 283 N.C. 299, 307, 196 S.E.2d 200, 206 (1973).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barefoot v. Durham Cnty.

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 20, 2025

    See Brown v. City of Winston- Salem, 171 N.C. App. 266, 270, 614 S.E.2d 599, 602 (2005). … The County contends the Board’s prior application of the UDO “is entitled to great consideration[,]” citing MacPherson v. Asheville, 283 N.C. 299, 307, 196 S.E.2d 200, 206 (1973).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Benbow v. Western Union Telegraph Company

    261 N.C. 404 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 4, 1964

    Jackson, being on Brown’s right, had the right of way notwithstanding Brown may have entered the intersection a hairsbreadth before him. G.S. 20-155(a); Yost v. Hall, 233 N.C. 463 , 64 S.E. 2d 554 . … Carr v. Lee, 249 N.C. 712 , 107 S.E. 2d 544 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • ADAMS CREEK ASSOCIATES v. Davis

    362 N.C. 354 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 11, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Karner v. Roy White Flowers, Inc.

    134 N.C. App. 645 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 7, 1999

    At some point before the summer of 1990, Brown opened a small consignment shop named “The Girl Can’t Help It” on the first floor of the house. Plaintiffs contend Brown also used the structure for a residence. … Brown’s business on lot two (2). Plaintiffs presented testimony by Lyman G.

    Reversed on other grounds by Karner v. Roy White Flowers, Inc., 351 N.C. 433 (2000)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Packingham

    229 N.C. App. 293 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 20, 2013

    Most recently, in Doe v. … Brown v. Entm’t Merchs. Ass’n, 2011 U.S. 4802 , 37-38, 180 L. Ed. 2d 708, 725 (2011) (quotations and citations omitted).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Kirby v. . Reynolds

    212 N.C. 271 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1937

    Conrad v. Board of Education , 190 N.C. 389 (393); Distributing Corp. v. Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue , 209 N.C. 47 (48). The language in Harley Lund Corp. v. … Perry v. Ins. Co. , 137 N.C. 404 . The principle is thus stated in Brown v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Robey v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 30, 2024

    See United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 620–21 (4th Cir. 2007); Durkee v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., 765 F. Supp. 2d 742, 747 (W.D.N.C. 2011), aff’d sub nom., Durkee v. Geologic Sols., Inc., 502 F. … Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.