Case law

Jin Zhu v. N. Cent. Educ. Serv. District

Washington Supreme Court · Nov 9, 2017

Zhu was one ofthree candidates interviewed, but ESD 171 ultimately hired a different candidate, whom Zhu claims was far less qualified for the position. … L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, does not use any "temporal qualifier").

Dennis v. Moses

40 L.R.A. 302 · Washington Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1898

This section clearly recognizes that there are cases where no appraisement is required. To what sales does it apply? … The meaning is that every citizen shall hold his life, liberty, property, and immunities, under the protection of the general rules which govern society.

Ago

Washington Attorney General Reports · Jun 21, 1999

Veharen supports our conclusion that the death or disqualification of the winning candidate in an election should not result in a victory for a candidate who clearly lost the race. … Even if such votes are ineffective for electing a candidate, they can clearly establish the voter's rejection of another candidate.

State v. Coria

120 Wash. 2d 156 · Washington Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1992

Since stops added after the master map is sent to SPI are not added to that ■map, such stops will not qualify as school bus route stops for purposes of the penalty enhancement. RCW 69.50-.435(f)(3). … This argument fails to establish an equal protection viola *175 tion. "It is well established that a showing of discriminatory intent or purpose is required to establish a valid equal protection claim." United States v.

In re Pers. Restraint of Khan

Washington Supreme Court · Nov 25, 2015

Under the current rules, a personal restraint petition will be dismissed "if it is clearly frivolous or clearly barred by RCW 10.73.090 or [RAP] 16.4(d)." RAP 16.8.1(b); RAP 16.11(b). … In addition, I<han was able to communicate his version of events and clearly deny the allegations against him. See id. at 344-45.

Spokane County v. State

136 Wash. 2d 644 · Washington Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1998

Elected prosecutors, however, are clearly elected for a specified term of office. … The similarities between the tenure of an elected prosecutor and the deputy prosecutor appointed by the elected prosecutor establish why the above arguments fail.

Feick v. State of Washington

District Court, W.D. Washington · Oct 1, 2025

Feick alleges that Krohn could not qualify as a True Party of Interest 6 under the Washington license because he was a California resident. Id. ¶ 25. Specifically, 7 Mr. … Feick has not established the grounds for 16 equitable tolling. Dkt. 27 at 6. Defendants assert that Mr.

State v. Smails

63 Wash. 172 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1911

There was not, it is true, the direct testimony of two witnesses to the perjury, but there was the direct testimony of one witness, and corroborating circumstances established by independent evidence of such a character “ … as clearly to turn the scale and overcome the oath of the defendant and the legal presumption of his innocence,” if the jury believed the evidence.

Huntworth v. Tanner

87 Wash. 670 · Washington Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1915

purpose of the act was to protect laborers and workers only as distinguished from professional men and others, and that the terms and history of the law concur to sustain a judicial declaration that the words “any person” qualify … Clearly it would not, for murder is a crime by all law, human and divine. It is malwn m se.

Myrick v. Board of Pierce County Commissioners

102 Wash. 2d 698 · Washington Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1984

(c) An ordinance to be void for unreasonableness must be clearly and plainly unreasonable. (d) The burden of establishing the invalidity of an ordinance rests heavily upon the party challenging its constitutionality. … On the other hand, other conduct is clearly within or outside the statute; for example, nudity is clearly barred and the wearing of a nurse-type uniform is clearly permitted.

International Rehabilitative Sciences, Inc. v. Sebelius

737 F. Supp. 2d 1281 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Jul 29, 2010

RS Medical has clearly made out a case of agency inconsistency. … RS Medical maintains that the peer-reviewed articles submitted, in addition to the widespread actual use of and payment for the BIOIOOO, clearly establish its acceptance and appropriateness.

State v. Barron

139 Wash. App. 266 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jun 18, 2007

Clearly, “should” is not “shall.” The consent letter uses both terms and could have used “shall” had the parties intended the notice requirement to be mandatory rather than merely directive. In Tennant v. … RCW 10.93.020(5) states that a reserve officer is a “Specially commissioned Washington peace officer” and “does not qualify under this chapter as a general authority Washington peace officer.”

Celeste Ryan, V. Jeff Timmerman

Court of Appeals of Washington · Feb 27, 2024

Nor did the summary explain how Matthew was qualified to testify on the cause of neurological symptoms. … A privileges and immunities clause claim first requires a legislative classification. Int’l Franchise Ass’n v. City of Seattle, 803 F.3d 389, 411 (9th Cir. 2015).

State Ex Rel. Namer Investment Corp. v. Williams

73 Wash. 2d 1 · Washington Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1968

The lessee, in addition to. occupancy, is given an option to purchase the property during *3 this term for an established price of $528,000. … Section .010 clearly provides that such transactions are amenable to the tax. Section .030 specifies that the basis for the tax is the “selling price” as defined.

State v. Lord

161 Wash. 2d 276 · Washington Supreme Court · Aug 30, 2007

jurisdiction of federal courts to grant habeas relief, mandating that such relief shall not be available unless the State court decision “resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly … established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(1).

Ronald J. Kraus, V. Washington State Patrol

Court of Appeals of Washington · Dec 6, 2022

“‘Exhaustion is required when: (1) a claim is cognizable in the first instance by an agency alone; (2) the agency has clearly established mechanisms for the resolution of complaints by aggrieved parties; and (3) the administrative … A qualified party shall be considered to have prevailed if the qualified party obtained relief on a significant issue that achieves some benefit that the qualified party sought. RCW 4.84.350(1).

New Tacoma Parking Corp. v. Johnston

85 Wash. 2d 707 · Washington Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1975

The articles of incorporation clearly indicate that the sole purpose for forming the corporation was to assist the City in qualifying for the receipt of the above described federal funds. … Furthermore, all parking rates and changes pertaining thereto, as well as all regulations and restrictions affecting the operation of the garages, were fixed, established and maintained by the City.

State v. Clarke

134 P.3d 188 · Washington Supreme Court · May 11, 2006

exceptional sentence as a matter of law, or (3) under an abuse of discretion standard, the exceptional sentence is clearly too excessive or clearly too lenient. *195 Clarke, 124 Wash. … (Reviser's note omitted). [3] The dissent fails to provide any support for its assertion that, in addition to Clarke's life sentence, Clarke's minimum term also qualifies as the "relevant statutory maximum " contemplated

Wilson v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance

101 F. Supp. 3d 1038 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Apr 29, 2015

Becker’s knowledge of these matters clearly stems from his professional experience. … The Ninth Circuit has held that failure to satisfy any of the safe harbor’s four requirements will subject an otherwise-qualified group insurance plan to ERISA. Stuart v. UNUM Life Ins.

State v. Walker

129 Wash. App. 258 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Aug 29, 2005

Washington, the United States Supreme Court established a rule barring admission of testimonial hearsay absent witness unavailability and a prior opportunity to cross-examine with regard to the statement. [11] Because it … [as interrogation] under any conceivable *940 definition." [16] And in a subsequent case, the United States Supreme Court found that "police questioning during a Terry stop qualifies as an interrogation," and that "responses