Case law

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Piwowar

305 Or. 494 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1988

Georgia-Pacific then sought judicial review of both decisions of the Board. The Court of Appeals applied this court’s recent decision in Johnson v. … Johnson v.

Smith v. Department of Corrections

245 Or. App. 640 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 21, 2011

*641 PER CURIAM The Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) seeks reconsideration of our decision in Smith v. Dept. of Corrections, 243 Or App 45 , 259 P3d 42 (2011). … In its petition, the board informs us that we were mistaken in our belief regarding the board’s two rules and that the board did in fact file the correct exhibits with the Secretary of State.

State v. Smalley

233 Or. App. 263 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 20, 2010

See State v. Brown, 301 Or 268, 277 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986) (recognizing an exception to the warrant requirement under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution); accord State v. … .” *267 Brown, 301 Or at 277 .

Cole v. Portland

96 Or. 645 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1920

Yamhill County, 8 Or. 337, 340 ; Smith v. Portland, 25 Or. 297, 301 ( 35 Pac. 665 ); Oregon Coal Co. v. Coos Co., 30 Or. 308, 310 ( 47 Pac. 851 ); Garnsey v. County Court, 33 Or. 201 ( 54 Pac. 539, 1089 ); Roethler v. … In Smith v. Portland, 25 Or. 297, 301 ( 35 Pac. 665 ), Mr.

Bluemer v. Southland Industries

221 Or. App. 252 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 23, 2008

In Marvin Wood Products v. … Citing Somers v.

Ramp v. Marion County

24 Or. 461 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1893

City Council of Montgomery, 65 Ala. *463 403 ; Lincoln v. City of Worcester, 8 Cush. 55 . … Bank v. Jordan, 16 Or. 113 ( 17 Pac. 621 ); Or. & Cal. R. R. Co. v. Lane Co. 23 Or. 385 ( 31 Pac. 964 ).

Norman v. Van Elsberg

262 Or. 286 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 17, 1972

We shall adopt this treatment in our opinion. ③ Mann v. County of Maricopa, 104 Ariz 561, 456 P2d 931 (1969); Powers v. Isley, 66 Ariz 94, 183 P2d 880 (1947); Smith v. … Miller, 153 Colo 35, 384 P2d 738 (1963); Noble County Council et al v. State ex rel Fifer, 234 Ind 172, 125 NE2d 709 (1955); Bass v. County of Saline, 171 Neb 538, 106 NW2d 860 (1960).

Gray v. Western Panel Mfg & EBI Companies

163 Or. App. 151 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 1999

Claimant also contends that the Board erred in determining that his combined condition was not compensable. Based on ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B) and SAIF v. … Dietz v.

STATE EX REL. ENGWEILER v. Cook

197 Or. App. 32 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 12, 2005

See State ex rel Osborne v. … See State ex rel Ricco v.

Evanite Fiber Corp. v. Striplin

99 Or. App. 353 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 8, 1989

Katzenbach, 307 Or 391 , 768 P2d 395 (1989), employer argues that the Board erred in relying on Guerrero v. … Webb v. SAIF, 83 Or App 386 , 731 P2d 1054 (1987); Roller v.

Compton v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

301 Or. 641 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1986

In Mansfield v. … In Maumary v.

Evjen v. Employment Division

22 Or. App. 372 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 25, 1975

Claimant appeals from an order of the Employment Appeals Board denying him unemployment compensation. The issue in this case, as was the situation in Minniti v. … “In affirming a decision of the Board denying benefits to a student attending Lane Community College, this court noted in Callaghan v.

State v. Snow

179 Or. App. 222 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 30, 2002

Brown, 301 Or at 277 . … Brown, 301 Or at 277 . Similarly, in State v.

Wright v. Employment Division

24 Or. App. 323 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 9, 1976

The Employment Appeals Board concluded that claimant did not have good cause to terminate her employment. The Board’s review of the referee’s determination is de novo on the record. Stevenson v. … Our review of the Board’s decision is for substantial evidence in the whole record. Western Amusement v. Springfield, 274 Or 37 , 545 P2d 592 (1976); Cantrell v.

Gordon v. Hill

189 Or. App. 363 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 10, 2003

In reaching that conclusion, the board specifically relied on our decisions in Weidner v. Armenakis, 154 Or App 12 , 959 *366 P2d 623, dismissed by order July 13, 1998, reasoning readopted and reaffirmed in Merrill v. … See, e.g., McGee v.

Ostrer v. Pine-Eagle School District No. 61

40 Or. App. 265 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 14, 1979

Portland Teachers v. School Dist., supra. … Dist. v.

Walker v. Oregon Travel Information Council

299 Or. App. 432 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 18, 2019

Brown v. J. C. … See Miller v.

State v. Martin

260 Or. App. 461 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 2, 2014

See State v. … Brown, 31 Or App at 508 . We applied similar reasoning in State v.

Wattenbarger v. Boise Cascade Corp.

300 Or. 12 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1986

Charles Wattenbarger, Petitioner On Review, v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Respondent On Review. TC 135,549; CA A32736; SC S32364. Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued and Submitted April 3, 1986. … circumstances of the individual case must predominate and the guidelines will be used only to the extent that their intrinsic persuasiveness assists the court in its independent assessment function," citing generally, Harwell v.

Sheets v. Knight

308 Or. 220 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1989

Western Graphics, 293 Or 96 , 643 P2d 1276 (1982); Brown v. Transcon Lines, 284 Or 597 , 588 P2d 1087 (1978); and Walsh v. … Consolidated Freightways, 278 Or 347 , 563 P2d 1205 (1977)) and enumerated the following exceptions: (a) a discharge for exercising a *231 job-related right, 9 Brown v.