Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

3.91s

  • Mechanics' Mutual Loan Ass'n v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    56 N.J.L. 6 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1893

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Halsey Electric Generator Co. v. State Board of Assessors

    74 N.J.L. 321 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 25, 1907

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Greenville Bus Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    126 N.J.L. 435 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 17, 1941

    “(e) The corporate minute book, the stock ledger, the books of account, the Certificate of approval of the Board of Public Utility Commissioners, approving of the stock, and the certificates of approval of the Board of Public … This last proposal is beyond the competence of the Board and is not within the limits of the application.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Licata v. New Jersey State Board of Tax Appeals

    113 N.J.L. 36 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 4, 1934

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lehigh Valley Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    5 N.J. Misc. 559 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 17, 1927

    The view of the board on this point meets with my entire *561 concurrence. … I have no doubt whatever about the jurisdiction of the board. It is not claimed, I think, that it was challenged at the hearing.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • First Church of Christ, Scientist v. Board of Adjustment

    127 N.J.L. 325 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 13, 1941

    It has been vacant for about fourteen years and is not salable for any purpose other than a gasoline station and lubritorium for which a permit was refused by the Fewark Board of Adjustment. … The action of the board will be reversed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Love v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    35 N.J.L. 269 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1871

    This litigation, at the last term, assumed the shape of a question which of two organizations was the legal board of chosen freeholders of Hudson county. That matter, in the case of The State, Feurey, relator, v. … Cited in State, Herder, pros., v. Collector, 7 Vr. 367 ; O’Donnell v. Dus man, 10 Vr. 684 . Ante p. 217.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Evesham Township Zoning Board of Adjustment v. Evesham Township Council

    176 N.J. Super. 503 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 12, 1980

    One of the ways in which the Legislature sought to encourage coordination to lessen the cost of development of land was to provide that planning boards and zoning boards of adjustment have final authority in development matters … In Mountain Hill Prop. v. Tp.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Town of West Orange v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    115 N.J.L. 396 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 26, 1935

    The statutes creating and regulating the present state board of tax appeals, chapters 100 and 336 of the laws of 1931, give the board power to make reasonable rules and regulations governing appeals to it. … We are of the opinion that the board had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Points six and seven again argue that the judgment of the board went beyond its powers, but as stated above, we think it did not.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Fejoku v. Prudential Life Ins. Co. of Am., Inc.

    236 N.J. 69 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 16, 2018

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Long Dock Co. v. Board of Equalization of Taxes

    87 N.J.L. 22 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 23, 1915

    The rule of law is thus stated in Jersey City v. Board of Assessors, 73 N. J. L. 164 (at p. 166) : “The proper method of assessment must be-determined by the nature of the title of defendants. … The nature of the right conveyed by a charter of this character is similar to that conveyed under- the Eiparian act, and the rule established bjr the Court of Errors- and Appeals in Polhemus v. Bateman, 60 N. J.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Henderson v. New Jersey Board of Examiners of Electrical Contractors

    85 N.J. Super. 509 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 8, 1964

    Moyant v. Paramus, 30 N. J. 528, 553 (1959) ; Ward v. Scott, 11 N. J. 117, 123 (1952); Greggio v. Orange, 69 N. J. Super. 453, 461 (Law Div. 1961), affirmed, o. b. sub non. Roselle v. East Orange, 37 N. J, 462 (1962). … Paramus, supra; revocation of a license “for cause,” In re Berardi, supra; “false, fraudulent, or misleading advertising,” Abelson's Inc. v. New Jersey Board of Optometrists, 5 N. J. 412, 422 (1950).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Fairmount Hospital, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    123 N.J.L. 201 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 22, 1939

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hackensack Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    35 N.J. 239 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 30, 1961

    Rockland County Anti-Reservoir Ass’n v. Duryea, 282 App. Div. 457 , 123 N. Y. S. 2d 445, 447 (App. Div. 1953). We agree the Board’s determination cannot be said to be unreasonable. … The Board’s treatment either assumes that Hackensack is bound by the inter-company contract to pay the higher sum despite the Board’s disallowance of the excess over $456,442, or that since the sum paid in the test year was

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Public Service Electric Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    87 N.J.L. 128 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 27, 1915

    Thereupon, the city appealed to the board of public utility commissioners, which board, after a hearing, made an order directing thé prosecutor to conform- to the duties imposed on it by the contract and to furnish free of … Co. v. Motley, 219 U. S. 485 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Kaveny v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF TOWN OF MONTCLAIR

    36 N.J. 597 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 26, 1962

    KAVENY, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE TOWN OF MONTCLAIR, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. February 26, 1962. Mr. Francis F. Welsh for the petitioner. Mr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • BROWN v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES

    District Court, D. New Jersey · May 11, 2023

    Corp. v. … King v. Taylor, 694 F.3d 650, 659-61 (6th Cir. 2012).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State ex rel. Board of Water Commissioners v. Brewster

    42 N.J.L. 125 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1880

    Co. v. Commissioners, 3 Harr. 71 ; Townsend v. Brown, 4 Zab. 80, 89; Gay v. Harvey, 12 Vroom 39 ; also the first maxim of Vattel, (D war. on Stat., p. 126.) … The board was organized to regulate a certain municipal interest, in the same manner that a school board or a board of fire.commissioners regulates, or could be created to manage, the affairs of its respective department.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Saunders v. Toms River Regional Schools Board of Education

    144 N.J. 371 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 2, 1996

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Chosen Freeholders v. President of State Bank

    38 N.J. Eq. 36 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1884

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.