Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,550 results
2.51s
City of Lewiston v. Androscoggin County
Superior Court of Maine · Nov 21, 2016
V § 5.5.3 (Aug. 14, 2013). … If the Commissioners are being sued in their official capacity, "[s]uits against employees in their official capacities are essentially suits against the government entities for which they work . ... " Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedInh. of the Town of W. Bath v. Reg'l Sch. Unit 1
Superior Court of Maine · Nov 17, 2014
See Hodgdon v. … Likewise, the decision in Berry v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished115 Me. 247 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 28, 1916
Harmon v. Harmon, supra. In Higgins v. Brown, 78 Maine, 473, our court held that mere threats of criminal prosecution, when no warrant had been issued nor proceedings commenced, do not constitute duress. … Again in Hilborn v.
Cited 1 timesPublished47 L.R.A. 752 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 31, 1899
Crocker v. McGregor, 76 Maine, 282 ; House v. Metcalf, supra; Brown v. Eastern and Midlands Ry. Co., 22 Q. B. Div. 391. … Vernon, 35 Maine, 100; evergreen tree standing in cart, Davis v. Bangor, 42 Maine, 522; a rock, Card v. Ellsworth, 65 Maine, 547; a cow, Perkins v. Fayette, 68 Maine, 152; a hole, Spaulding v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedWinship v. Brewer School Committee
390 A.2d 1089 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 29, 1978
See Miller v. Board of Education of Sch. Dist., Number 132, 98 Ill.App.2d 305 , 240 N.E.2d 471 (1968). … See Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341, 96 S.Ct. 2074 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976); see also Miller v. Board of Education of Sch. Dist., Number 132, supra.
Cited 26 timesPublishedUnited Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. Franks
85 Me. 321 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 23, 1893
Brown v. Veazie, 25 Maine, 362 ; Matthews v. Light, 32 Maine, 305. … McLaughlin v. Randall, 66 Maine, 226.
Cited 2 timesPublished201 F.R.D. 12 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 8, 2001
See Gould v. … members on plaintiff's board, “rais[ing] the spectre of subtle conflicts of interest between these parties who *15 may be friendly antagonists”); Haft v.
Cited 2 timesPublished385 F. Supp. 2d 38 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 2, 2005
Browning Ferris Indus., 160 F.3d 839, 841-42 (1st Cir.1998) (quoting Nat’l Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 735 (1st Cir.1995)). … Under this standard, the Court can only set aside the decision of the Board if that decision is “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” S. Shore Hosp., Inc. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished118 Me. 452 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 7, 1920
enacted an ordinance prohibiting any plumbing work being done in that city without a plan of the number and kind of fixtures and the size of the waste and vent-pipes being filed with and a permit being obtained of the local Board … State v. Gardner, 58 Ohio St., 599 . Plumbing, therefore, as indicated by Sec. 112 of Chap. 19, R.
Cited 1 timesPublished4 Me. 345 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1826
the plaintiffs5, vessel, one of (he plaintiffs forbid their being put on hoard until security was given ; however, after conversing with the captain, he consented that they should be put on board, upon the original condition … The principles on which the court decided the case of Buffington & al. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished584 A.2d 615 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 18, 1990
Caine, M.D. and Frank Cruickshank, M.D. in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Browne, J.). 1 Plaintiff contends that her complaint contains an actionable claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress even if summary … Purty v. Kennebec Valley Medical Center, 551 A.2d 858, 859 (Me.1988); see also Gammon v. Osteopathic Hosp. of Maine, 534 A.2d 1282, 1283 (Me.1987); Rowe v. Bennett, 514 A.2d 802, 807 (Me.1986).
Cited 28 timesPublishedC-K Enterprises, Inc. v. Depositors Trust Co.
438 A.2d 262 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 18, 1981
Brown v. Manchester, Me., 384 A.2d 449, 451 (1978); Nichols v. City of Rockland, Me., 324 A.2d 295, 297 (1974). … See Michaud v. Steckino, 390 A.2d at 534 , Towle v. Aube, 310 A.2d at 266 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedKeyes Fibre Co. v. Chaplin Corp.
97 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, D. Maine · May 8, 1951
Hoover v. … Coe is authority for the proposition that the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has jurisdiction to consider a bill in equity to review an action of the Board of Patent Appeals, where the Board has
Cited 5 timesPublished389 A.2d 1 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 5, 1978
Brown v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 43 , 365 F.2d 976 (1966). See, United States v. Easter, 552 F.2d 230 (8th Cir. 1977); People v. Ramey, 16 Cal.3d 263 , 127 Cal. Rptr. 629 , 545 P.2d 1333 (1976). … In addition, appellant may also have been entitled to automatic standing under Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960). But see Brown v.
Cited 35 timesPublishedMaynard v. Commissioner of Corrections
681 A.2d 19 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 5, 1996
Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Brennan, BAR-95-6 (Dec. 26, 1995) CDana, J.). 6 The court granted the relief requested by the defendants and set aside its prior order and default judgment. … Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Brennan, BAR-95-6 (Dec. 26, 1995) (Dana, J.). 7 . The court set aside the default judgment based on its conclusion that it was void ab initio.
Cited 14 timesPublishedJudkins v. Maine Central Railroad
80 Me. 417 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 18, 1888
He then got down upon the track in front of the car, moving towards him, and grasped a hold upon the front board of the bin which held the coal, the board being near the front of the car, planting his feet upon the brake-beam … Under this rule, it was held in Belair v. Chicago, &c. Ry.
Cited 8 timesPublished68 Me. 258 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 7, 1878
The remarks of Campbell, J., in Christ Church v. Philadelphia County, 24 How. 300, 302 , are peculiarly applicable. … Brown’s Legal Maxims, 33. This law in its generality embraces *262 all erections to be made after its passage. The special act, c. 212, belongs to that class of acts to be construed most strictly.
Cited 1 timesPublished68 Me. 21 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 27, 1876
Varnum v. … Wilson v. Ring, 40 Maine, 116. Stewart v. Crosby, 50 Maine, 130. Maynard v. Hunt, 5 Pick. 240 . Currier v. Gale, 9 Allen, 522 . Howe v. Lewis, 14 Pick. 329 .
Cited 5 timesPublished9 F. Cas. 109 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · Sep 15, 1852
Prevost v. Gratz, 6 Wheat. [19 U. S.] 481; Elmendorf v. Taylor, 10 Wheat. [23 U. S.] 153; Piatt v. Vattier, 9 Pet. [34 U. S.] 410; Stearns v. Page [Case No. 13,339]; Wagner v. Baird, 7 How. [48 U. … S.] 234; 1 Madd. 99; Lawrence v. Blake, 8 Clark & F. 504; Hough v.
Cited 6 timesPublished534 A.2d 359 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 10, 1987
Hall v. Board of Environmental Protection, 498 A.2d 260, 266 (Me.1985). … Beecy v. Pucciarelli, 387 Mass. 589 , 441 N.E.2d 1035, 1040 (1982). Cf. Finn v. Lipman, 526 A.2d 1380, 1383 (Me.1987).
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna