Case law

Post Tension of Nevada, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

331 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 4, 2009

The employer contends the Board’s findings are unsupported by substantial evidence. In accord with our “highly deferential” standard of review, Capital Cleaning Contractors, Inc., v. … relationship,” NLRB v.

In Re Inslaw, Inc.

97 B.R. 685 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 1989

Conway and Brown will conduct the litigation in the Board of Contract Appeals and Court of Claims arising directly out of the contract. … Based upon the leading case of Woods v. City Nat.

Parks v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 27, 2020

See Brown v. Brown, 343 A.2d 59, 61 (D.C. 1975). … Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1024 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (quoting Tsintolas Realty Co. v. Mendez, 984 A.2d 181, 187 (D.C. 2009)).

Egan v. United States Agency for International Development

381 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 31, 2004

See FDA v. … As we said in Sendra Corporation v.

Local 13, Detroit Newspaper Printing & Graphic Communications Union v. National Labor Relations Board

598 F.2d 267 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 9, 1979

Accordingly, we pay great deference to the Board’s decision; and must affirm if it is supported in the record and reasonably based in law. See San Diego Newspaper Guild v. NLRB, 548 F.2d at 867; NLRB v. … The order of the Board is therefore Affirmed. . The opinion and order of the National Labor Relations Board (Board) is reprinted in 233 N.L.R.B. No. 144 (1977). .

Cummings v. Department of the Navy

116 F. Supp. 2d 76 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 6, 2000

Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 299 , 103 S.Ct. 2362 , 76 L.Ed.2d 586 (1983) (quoting United States v. Brown, 348 U.S. 110, 112 , 75 S.Ct. 141 , 99 L.Ed. 139 (1954)). … See, e.g., Bois v. Marsh, 801 F.2d 462 (D.C.Cir.1986) ( 42 U.S.C. § 1985 action); Verma v. United States, 19 F.3d 646 (D.C.Cir.1994) (due process and just compensation claims based on the Fifth Amendment); Brown v.

International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Tiidee Products, Inc.

426 F.2d 1243 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 1970

426 F.2d 1243 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Zanoff, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, also entered an appearance for petitioner in No. 22,911 and respondent in No. 22,797. Mr. Roy E. Browne, Akron, Ohio, for respondent in No. 22,911.

Miller v. Hersman

594 F.3d 8 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 5, 2010

Before: HENDERSON, ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. … Osuagwu v.

Local Union 219, Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

265 F.2d 814 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 19, 1959

National Labor Relations Board v. Lion Oil Co., 1957, 352 U.S. 282, 288 , 77 S.Ct. 330, 334 , 1 L.Ed.2d 331 . … See also National Labor Relations Board v. Lion Oil Co., supra, 352 U.S. at page 289 , 77 S.Ct. at page 334 .

In Re NAVY CHAPLAINCY

850 F. Supp. 2d 86 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 2012

Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Robert Franklin v. District of Columbia

163 F.3d 625 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 22, 1999

Taylor v. Board of Educ., 288 F.2d 600 , 602 (2d Cir.1961) (Friendly, J.). The antitrust case of Brown Shoe Co. v. … See Brown Shoe Co., 370 U.S. at 308 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 .

Laurie L. Abraham v. Graphic Arts International Union

660 F.2d 811 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 14, 1981

Appellant also filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board. This was rejected. App. 29, 25, 86. The Board’s action was challenged in the District Court, but was summarily dismissed. … Appellant says Beryl Brown told her that a temporary replacement would be hired. App. 249.

Webster v. United States Department of Energy

267 F. Supp. 3d 246 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2017

Brown’s or Ms. … The MSPB regulations state that “[w]here the appellant has been subject to an action appealable to the Board, he or she may either file a timely complaint of discrimination with the agency or file an appeal with the Board

Greenwood's Transfer & Storage Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

553 A.2d 1246 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1989

Notice of a civil or administrative action by a board or commission given to the counsel of a party is considered notice to the party. See St. Louis v. Alverno College, 744 F.2d 1314 , 1316 n. 4 (7th Cir.1984); Bell v. … Brown, 181 U.S.App.D.C. 226 , 233 & n. 60, 557 F.2d 849 , 856 & n. 60 (1977); Aberson v. Glassman, 70 F.R.D. 683 , 684 & n. 3 (S.D.N.Y.1976); Moore v.

Escobedo v. Green

602 F. Supp. 2d 244 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2009

Piersall v. Winter, 435 F.3d 319, 324 (D.C.Cir.2006). Military boards are entitled to even greater deference than civilian administrative agencies. Labin v. Harvey, Civ. No. 05-315, 2006 WL 949884 , *5 (D.D.C. … Casey v. United States, 8 Cl.Ct. 234, 239 (Fed.Cl.1985); see also Simmons v. Brown, 497 F.Supp. 173, 178 (D.Md.1980) (regulations of the branches of service must be in accord with DoD regulations); cf. Holz v.

Hopkins v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 2010

Co. v. Odoi Assocs., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 655, *108 (D.D.C. Jan. 4, 2006) (citing Brown v. Carr, 503 A.2d 1241, 1247 (D.C. 1986)). … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing Bennett Enters. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc., 45 F.3d 493, 499 (D.C. Cir. 1995)).

Teamsters Local Union No. 515 v. National Labor Relations Board

906 F.2d 719 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 1990

The Board's interpretation of the Act on this point is a permissible one, to which we must defer. See, e.g., NLRB v. … Brief for Board at 43. The Board then cites as supporting authority Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v.

Taylor v. Frenkel ex rel. Frenkel

499 A.2d 1212 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 1985

See Gabrielian v. Gabrielian, 473 A.2d 847, 850 (D.C. *1215 1984); Brown v. Brown, 343 A.2d 59, 61 (D.C.1975). … Capital Development Board, 717 F.2d 385, 390 (7th Cir.1983), such an award is specifically allowed in the District of Columbia by D.C.Code § 15-111 (1981).

In re S.H.

570 A.2d 814 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1990

Estelle v. … A key government witness was nineteen-year-old Michael Cox, who knew both appellant and Brown. 12 He testified that appellant, not Brown, fired the shot.

Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Block-Southland Sportswear, Inc., Southland Manufacturing Company, Inc., Intervenors. Block-Southland Sportswear, Inc., Southland Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

420 F.2d 1296 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 1969

Brown Hill Boswell, Charlotte N.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. J. W. … NLRB v.