Case law

Booth v. Tektronix, Inc.

312 Or. 463 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1991

The Court of Appeals affirmed the Board’s order without opinion. Booth v. Tektronix, 97 Or App 431 , 776 P2d 884 (1989). We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals. … See Branscomb v. LCDC, 297 Or 142 , 681 P2d 124 (1984) (court will give deference to agency’s interpretation of its rule adopted pursuant to a policy-delegating statute). The Board is permitted, as it did in Alan W.

Billings v. Maass

86 Or. App. 66 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 24, 1987

Gladden, 210 Or 46, 62-63 , 298 P2d 986 , 309 P2d 192 (1957), cert den 359 US 948 (1959); see Gordon v. Board of Parole, 48 Or App 25 , 615 P2d 1191 (1980). … ORS 174.010; Raudebaugh v. Action Pest Control, Inc., 59 Or App 166, 172 , 650 P2d 1006 (1982).

Compensation of Jones v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

49 Or. App. 543 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 1, 1980

Hammond v. Albina Engine & Mach., 13 Or App 156 , 509 P2d 56 (1973); Hiles v. Compensation Department, 2 Or App 506, 470 P2d 165 (1970); Barr v. Compensation Department, 1 Or App 432 , 463 P2d 871 (1970). In Hiles v. … "We have previously held that Board orders remanding a case to the hearing officer are not final appealable orders.” Buster v. Chase Bag Co., 14 Or App 323, 331 , 513 P2d 504 (1973), citing Hammond v.

Norman v. Van Elsberg

262 Or. 286 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 17, 1972

We shall adopt this treatment in our opinion. ③ Mann v. County of Maricopa, 104 Ariz 561, 456 P2d 931 (1969); Powers v. Isley, 66 Ariz 94, 183 P2d 880 (1947); Smith v. … Miller, 153 Colo 35, 384 P2d 738 (1963); Noble County Council et al v. State ex rel Fifer, 234 Ind 172, 125 NE2d 709 (1955); Bass v. County of Saline, 171 Neb 538, 106 NW2d 860 (1960).

Compton v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

301 Or. 641 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1986

In Mansfield v. … In Maumary v.

Evjen v. Employment Division

22 Or. App. 372 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 25, 1975

Claimant appeals from an order of the Employment Appeals Board denying him unemployment compensation. The issue in this case, as was the situation in Minniti v. … “In affirming a decision of the Board denying benefits to a student attending Lane Community College, this court noted in Callaghan v.

Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School District

194 Or. App. 301 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 28, 2004

Failure on the part of FDAB to do so suggests that it impermissibly substituted its own judgment for that of the school board. See Jefferson County School Dist. No. 509-J v. … Thyfault v. Pendleton School District No. 16R, FDA 90-4 (Jan 18, 1991) (upholding dismissal based, in part, on spanking of child); see also Webster v.

Burns v. Newell

12 Or. App. 621 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 12, 1973

Gibbs v. … Both opinions in Fredericks v.

Rogers v. Corvel Enterprise Comp, Inc.

318 Or. App. 641 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 30, 2022

The board adopted the ALJ’s findings. There cannot be a plausible contention that claimant was not exposed to Influenza A at work. Employer contends that our opinion incorrectly relied on Mize v. … See, e.g., Staffing Servs., Inc. v.

Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Hayes

325 Or. 592 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1997

Andrews v. … Clark v. U.S.

McDowell v. State Accident Insurance Fund

13 Or. App. 389 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 31, 1973

See, Verban v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 168 Or 394 , 123 P2d 988 (1942); Hinkle v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 163 Or 395 , 97 P2d 725 (1940) *395 (partially overruled on a different point in Dimitroff v. State Ind. Acc. … See, Murray v. Lamb, 174 Or 239 , 148 P2d 797 (1944); Whitney v. Whitney et al., 114 Or 102 , 235 P 293 (1925).

Clatsop County v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

96 Or. 2 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1920

In Pacific Wood & Coal Co. v. … With a boarding camp. “Q. What is the necessity of a boarding camp around camps of that kind? “A.

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Piwowar

305 Or. 494 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1988

Georgia-Pacific then sought judicial review of both decisions of the Board. The Court of Appeals applied this court’s recent decision in Johnson v. … Johnson v.

State v. Lewis

19 Or. 478 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1890

They are all resolvable into a single question, and that is, whether or not it was competent for the State to rely for conviction upon the evidence given by the witness Brown in relation to other emheLzloEaents than the particular … Ev., § 46; Mayer v. People, 80 N. Y. 364 ; Shipply v. People, 86 id. 375; 40 Am. Rep. 551 ; Pinckard v. State, 13 Tex. App. 468; Com. v. Shepard, 1 Allen, 575 . In Commonwealth v.

Vanderzanden v. Lowell School District No. 71

369 F. Supp. 67 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 5, 1973

Karp v. Becken, 477 F.2d 171, 174 (1973); see also Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sinderman, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); Hayes v. Cape Henlopen School Dist., supra.

Smith v. Department of Corrections

251 Or. App. 775 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 22, 2012

Smith v. Board of Parole, 250 Or App 345 , 284 P3d 1150 (2012) (Smith I). In the present case, petitioner challenges a different notice from a different agency, also regarding inmate hearing rights, for the same reason. … In Smith v.

Gray v. Western Panel Mfg & EBI Companies

163 Or. App. 151 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 1999

Claimant also contends that the Board erred in determining that his combined condition was not compensable. Based on ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B) and SAIF v. … Dietz v.

State v. Martin

260 Or. App. 461 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 2, 2014

See State v. … Brown, 31 Or App at 508 . We applied similar reasoning in State v.

Adams v. Clements

183 Or. App. 207 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 7, 2002

Intervenors have appealed, and the initial question on appeal is whether the fact that petitioner could have sought judicial review of the Board’s order precludes him from seeking habeas. See Tiner v. … Gage v. Maass, 306 Or 196, 204 , 759 P2d 1049 (1988). Here, ORS 144.335(1) permits petitioner to seek judicial review of the Board’s action and is an adequate alternative remedy. Cf. Frady v.

STATE EX REL. ENGWEILER v. Cook

197 Or. App. 32 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 12, 2005

See State ex rel Osborne v. … See State ex rel Ricco v.