Case law

United States v. Karen R. Young and Nathaniel J. Pugh

598 F.2d 296 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 12, 1979

Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 172-73, 175 , 69 S.Ct. 1302 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949); Draper v. United States, 358 U.S. 307 , 79 S.Ct. 329 , 3 L.Ed.2d 327 (1959); United States v. … See United States v. Davis, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 400 , 458 F.2d 819 (1972); United States v. Hall, 187 U.S.App.D.C. 215 , 535 F.2d 857 (1976); United States v.

Microimage Display Division of Xidex Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, Local 619, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. Local 619, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

924 F.2d 245 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 4, 1991

Brown, 380 U.S. at 287-88 , 85 S.Ct. at 985-87 ; see also NLRB v. … Brown, 380 U.S. at 286 , 85 S.Ct. at 985 ; see also Radio Officers' Union v. NLRB, 347 U.S. 17, 42-44 , 74 S.Ct. 323, 336-338 , 98 L.Ed. 455 (1954).

Jones v. Bernanke

493 F. Supp. 2d 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 2007

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999); Stewart v. Ashcroft, 352 F.3d 422, 428 (D.C.Cir.2003); Carroll v. England, 321 F.Supp.2d 58, 68 (D.D.C.2004). … Brown v. Bank One, N.A., 168 Fed.Appx. 46, 53 (6th Cir.2006) (stating that facts that were insufficient to establish a prima facie case were also insufficient to establish pretext).

St. Francis Federation of Nurses & Health Professionals v. National Labor Relations Board

729 F.2d 844 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 1984

International Union v. … Some courts indeed have imposed a duty on the Board to inquire into subsequent developments before issuing a bargaining order. See, e.g., NLRB v.

Koniag, Inc., the Village of Uyak v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, the Village of Litnik Koniag, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, Salamatof Village Association and Cook Inlet Region, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, the Village of Anton Larsen Bay Koniag, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, the Village of Uganik Koniag, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, the Village of Bells Flats Koniag, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, the Village of Ayakulik Koniag, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, the Village of Port William Koniag, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, the Village of Solomon Bering Straits Native Corporation v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, Village of Alexander Creek Cook Inlet Region, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior

580 F.2d 601 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 28, 1978

Ken Brown, a close advisor to the Secretary who briefed him on the cases at the time he decided to approve the Board's recommended decisions. … Brown was not asked to prejudge any of the claims by characterizing their validity. See Pillsbury Co. v. FTC, supra at 964.

Fleming v. District of Columbia

633 A.2d 846 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 1993

The appeals board’s decision can then be appealed to Superior Court within 30 days. D.C.Code §§ 40-631-645 (1981 ed.). … Co. v. Brown, 593 A.2d 184 (D.C.1991), [i]t is a longstanding and basic principle that a motion under Rule 60(b) may not be utilized as a substitute for an appeal....

Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated, Intervenor. Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

373 F.2d 655 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1967

Brown, Chicago, Ill., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Illinois, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. John W. Noble, Jr., Chicago, Ill., Frederick M. Rowe and Ronald J. … Grant Co. v. NLRB, 337 F.2d 447, 449 (7th Cir. 1964), the Board held that the mere request was a violation of the Act.

United Food & Commercial Workers International Union Local 400 v. National Labor Relations Board

222 F.3d 1030 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 22, 2000

Co. v. NLRB, 194 F.3d 165, 168 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (citing SEC v. … In Woll v.

Hatch v. Ooms

69 F. Supp. 788 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 23, 1947

Div., in the case of United' States v. … In a brief, signed by both Brown and Dorsey, in the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, under the caption “The Last Step Wins and Commercial Success is Persuasive of Invention,” an argument is made and excerpts

All Seasons Climate Control, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

236 F. App'x 636 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 21, 2007

No. 42 (2005) — in which the Board upheld the election results — than those in Electric Hose & Rubber Co., 262 N.L.R.B. 186 (1982), Performance Measurements Co., 148 N.L.R.B. 1657 (1964), and Nathan Katz Realty, LLC v. … Co. v. NLRB, 99 F.3d 413, 419 (D.C.Cir.1996). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

Sherwood Bros. v. District of Columbia

113 F.2d 162 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 29, 1940

Young, 1933, 210 Wis. 588 , 247 N.W. 61 ], appeal from a local board of tax appeals to the state board of tax appeals [Ettrick v. … Brown, 1891, 16 Colo. 462 , 27 P. 945 , 14 L.R.A. 120 ; Williams v. Lane, 1894, 87 Wis. 152 , 58 N.W. 77 . 6 E. g., Shea v. San Bernardino, 1936, 7 Cal.2d 688 , 62 P.2d 365 ; Myers v.

Sheet Metal Workers, Local Union No. 91 v. National Labor Relations Board

905 F.2d 417 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1990

Workers v. NLRB, 797 F.2d 1027 , 1030 (D.C.Cir.1986) (quoting NLRB v. … Workers v.

The Idaho Statesman v. National Labor Relations Board, Boise Typographical Union No. 271, Intervenor

836 F.2d 1396 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 22, 1988

See generally National Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Div. of Borg-Warner Corp., 356 U.S. 342 , 78 S.Ct. 718 , 2 L.Ed.2d 823 (1958). … No. 41, at 10 (Aug. 29, 1986) (citing Newspaper Printing Corp. v. NLRB, 625 F.2d at 963). The Board adopted this determination without modification.

International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

604 F.2d 689 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 1979

It is well settled that bargaining obligations in general do not depend on Board election and certification. 29 U.S.C. § 158 (a)(5); see, e. g., NLRB v. Movie Star, Inc., 361 F.2d 346 , 351 (5th Cir. 1966); NLRB v. … appropriate units, and a Board decision “ ‘is rarely to be disturbed.’ ” South Prairie Construction Co. v.

Albert C. Homcy v. Stanley R. Resor, Secretary of the Army

455 F.2d 1345 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 16, 1971

Appellee relies on Hiatt v. … Hiatt v. Brown, 339 U.S. 103 , 70 S.Ct. 495 , 94 L.Ed. 691 (1950) ; Martin v. Mott, 25 U.S. (12 Wheat.) 19, 34-35 , 6 L.Ed. 537 (1827) ; United States ex rel. McClellan v.

Firestone v. Fed. Ret. Thrift Inv. Bd.

375 F. Supp. 3d 102 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 25, 2019

In Kriebel v. … In Jenkins v.

United States v. Benjamin T. Thornton, Prince George's County, Maryland

672 F.2d 101 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 24, 1982

United States v. … S. v.

Grange Debris Box & Wrecking Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

210 F. App'x 7 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 21, 2006

JUDGMENT This case was considered on a petition for review and cross-application of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) and was briefed and argued by the parties. … Because this is a factual question, we uphold the Board’s findings “if supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole____” 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e). In Corporate Express Delivery Sys. v.

Local Union No. 2188, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

494 F.2d 1087 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 1974

In No. 72-1994, Local 2188, IBEW v. NLRB and Western Electric Co. and No. 72-1995, Local 1974, IBEW v. … The Collyer doctrine has been applied by the Board in numerous subsequent cases and has received judicial approval in the Second Circuit. Nabisco, Inc. v. NLRB, 479 F.2d 770 (2d Cir. 1973).

Bathroom Design Institute v. Parker

317 A.2d 526 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1974

The contract was void and unenforceable, Miller v. Peoples Contractors, Ltd., D.C.App., 257 A.2d 476, 478 (1969), Brown v. … See Gardner and North Roofing and Siding Corp. v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System, 150 U.S.App.D.C. 329, 332 , 464 F.2d 838, 841 (1972); see also Tcherepnin v.