Case law

Iles v. Fred Meyer, Inc.

173 Or. App. 254 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 28, 2001

See also SAIF v. Lewis, 170 Or App 201 , 12 P3d 498 (2000). Claimant argued to the Board that the medical evidence of edema was an objective finding. … Here, the Board did not “provide a ‘sufficient explanation to allow a reviewing court to examine the agency’s action.’ ” SAIF v. January, 166 Or App 620, 626 , 998 P2d 1286 (2000), quoting Schoch v.

Higley v. Edwards

67 Or. App. 488 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 28, 1984

See Glide School Dist. v. Carell, 39 Or App 727, 732 , 593 P2d 1224 (1979); see also Richardson v. Perales, 402 US 389 , 91 S Ct 1420 , 28 L Ed 2d 842 (1971); Calhoun v. … Black, 251 Or 177, 186 , 444 P2d 929 (1968); see also State v. Middleton, 295 Or 485 , 668 P2d 371 (1983); State v. Green, 271 Or 153 , 531 P2d 245 (1975); State v. Kerstig, 50 Or App 461 , 623 P2d 1095 (1981).

State v. Coats

158 Or. 122 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1937

McDonald, 132 Or. 622 ( 287 P. 220 ); National Thrift Ass’n v. Crews, supra; National Sales Co. v. Manciet, 83 Or. 34 ( 162 P. 1065 , L. R. A. 1917D, 485); Quatsoe v. Eggleston, supra; Fleming v. … Bartee, 187 La. 529 ( 175 So. 50 ); State v. Lowe, 178 N. C. 770 ( 101 S. E. 385 ); Commonwealth v. Plissner (Mass.), 4 N. E. (2d) 241; Johnson v. State, 137 Ala. 101 (34 So. *134 1018); Loiseau v.

Alcala v. Employment Department

235 Or. App. 32 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 21, 2010

As we recently reiterated in Castro v. … See also Salosha, Inc. v.

Price v. SAIF Corp.

296 Or. 311 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1984

Winters v. Grimes, 124 Or 214, 216-17 , 264 P 359 (1928). … The supreme court’s opinion in Cavins v.

Volp v. Saylor

42 Or. 546 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1903

court of record entered without jurisdiction of the person or authority of law, when it SO' appears upon its-faee, may be vacated at any time by virtue of the power inherent in the court, and even upon its own motion: Ladd v. … Mason, 10 Or. 308 ; White v. Ladd, 41 Or. 324 ( 68 Pac. 739 ).

Smirnoff v. SAIF Corp.

188 Or. App. 438 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 2, 2003

As we explained in O’Neal v. … Our decision in Jeld-Wen, Inc. v.

Niccum v. Southcoast Lumber Co.

123 Or. App. 472 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993

The Board relied on its decision in Stanley Meyers, 43 Van Natta 2643 (1991), and its interpretation of ORS 656.327 and ORS 656.704. In Meyers v. … In Jefferson v.

Brooks v. Timber

55 Or. App. 688 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 25, 1982

McGarry v. SAIF, 24 Or App 883, 888 , 547 P2d 654 (1976). Employer does not contest the Board’s finding that claimant’s injury is compensable. … Claimant prevailed on a previously disallowed claim at the Board level, and the *693 Board was without authority to reduce the award of attorney fees on its own motion. See Moe v.

Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. v. Frazer

252 Or. App. 726 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 17, 2012

-Domino’s v. … See McTaggart v.

Henthorn v. Grand Prairie School District No. 14

39 Or. App. 351 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 19, 1979

The provision as amended in 1975 may or may not reflect a reaction to this court’s opinion in Hawkins v. … Hill v. State, 23 Or 446 , 32 P 168 (1893). Plaintiff’s proceeding is therefore independent of ORS 342.835 3 and must rest on its justiciability under ORS 34.010-.100.

Delaney v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.

278 Or. 305 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 10, 1977

In Fouchek v. … In Starr v.

State v. M. T. F.

326 Or. App. 371 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 14, 2023

See Kragt v. Board of Parole, 325 Or App 688, 529 P3d 1019 (2023). … The main difference between this case and Brown is 380 State v. M. T. F.

Gleason v. Oregon Racing Commission

233 Or. App. 164 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 6, 2010

In Guzman v. … See Cansino v.

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Miller

306 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1988

PER CURIAM Claimant’s employer in this case and claimant in Dunn v. … In an opinion in this case, the majority, over a dissent, held that the Board rule exceeded the scope of its rulemaking authority. Weyerhaeuser Company v. Miller, 88 Or App 286 , 745 P2d 429 (1987).

Penifold v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

49 Or. App. 1015 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 1980

Buster v. Chase Bag Co., 14 Or App 323 , 513 P2d 504 (1973). Hamilton v. SAIF, 11 Or App 344 , 501 P2d 1007 (1972), rev den (1973); Sahnow v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. … See Brenner v. Industrial Indemnity Co., 30 Or App 69 , 566 P2d 530 (1977); Petersen v. Travelers Insurance., 21 Or App 637 , 536 P2d 448 (1975); Sahnow v. Fireman’s Fund Ins.

In re the Marriage of Hadley

77 Or. App. 295 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 22, 1986

Abraham v. Abraham, 248 Or 163, 164 , 432 P2d 797 (1967); Brown v. Brown, 28 Or App 535, 537 , 559 P2d 1332 (1977). … See Brown v. Brown, supra. The question is whether the trial court had the authority, without a change of circumstances, to order the Secretary to make payments directly to wife from husband’s retirement pay.

State v. King

67 Or. App. 749 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 18, 1984

As they crossed over the connecting road they saw defendant get out of the occupied car and walk to the empty car carrying a brown paper bag. … State v. Valdez, 277 Or 621, 629 , 561 P2d 1006 (1977).

Portland v. Parker

69 Or. 271 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1914

v. … [Mass.] 172; Brown v. County Commissioners, 21 Pa. 42 ; State v. Fitzporter, 17 Mo. App. 273 ; Fosdick v. Village of Perrysburg, 14 Ohio St. 485 , 486; Sedgwick, Statutory Law, 123.”

Willamina Education Ass'n v. Willamina School District 30J

50 Or. App. 195 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 3, 1981

The standard of review applied by this Board is that enunciated by the National Labor Relations Board in Spielberg Manufacturing Co. and its progeny, adopted by this Board in Siegel v. … "The tests applied in deciding whether or not this Board should defer to a prior arbitration award in unfair labor practice cases are found in Siegal [sic] v. Gresham Grade Teachers Association, Case No.