Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

2.07s

  • Fine Airport Parking, Inc. v. City of Tulsa

    74 O.B.A.J. 954 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 2003

    Board of Regents v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, 1977 OK 17 , ¶ 15, 561 P.2d 499, 505-6 . … Board of Regents v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, supra,, and Krebsbach v. Henley, supra.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • In Re Hoover

    32 B.R. 842 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 7, 1983

    See Grigsby-Grunow Co. v. … Brown, as the purchasor was Mrs.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Midland Valley Co. v. Hilliard

    46 Okla. 391 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 11, 1915

    In a few minutes after boarding the train, and within about a half mile from where he boarded it, and while he was in the act of paying the conductor his fare, the coach in which he was riding fell through a bridge into the … City of Olympia, 34 Wash. 379 , 75 Pac. 978 ; Harris v. Brown's Bay Lumber Co., 57 Wash, 8, 106 Pac. 152 ; Nichols v. Brabazon, 94 Wis. 549 , 69 N. W. 342 ; Union Gold Min. Co. v. Crawford, 29 Colo. 511 , 69 Pac. 600 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Acker Industries, Inc.

    312 F. Supp. 1400 · District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Jan 15, 1970

    NLRB V. … NLRB v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Goodall v. City of Clinton

    196 Okla. 10 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1945

    HURST, V. C. J. … State Election Board, 121 Okla. 119 , 248 P. 642 ; American Druggists Fire Ins. Co. v. State Insurance Board, 184 Okla. 66 , 84 P. 2d 614 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Linville v. Barrows

    489 F. Supp. 2d 1278 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 19, 2007

    Yu v. Brown, 36 F.Supp.2d 922, 929 (D.N.M.1999); see also Saleh v. Ridge, 367 F.Supp.2d 508, 511-12 (S.D.N.Y.2005); Bartolini v. Ashcroft, 226 F.Supp.2d 350, 354 (D.Conn.2002). … There are no formulaic bases for resolving these kinds of issues; there is no particular time frame that is presumptively unreasonable across the agency board.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • St. Louis & S. F. R. v. Thompson

    35 Okla. 138 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1912

    Wiggins et al. v. A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 9 Okla. 118 , 59 Pac. 248 , and A., T. &. S. F. Ry. Co. v. … Wiggins et al. v. A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co., supra; A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Wiggins, supra; Collins et al. v. Green et al., 10 Okla. 244 , 62 Pac. 813 ; Russell v. Green et al., 10 Okla. 340 , 62 Pac. 817 .

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Watchorn Basin Ass'n v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.

    525 P.2d 1357 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1974

    Article VII, § 4, of the Constitution, grants this Court superintending control over all inferior courts, and all agencies, commissions and boards created by law. In Heartsill v. … J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and HODGES, LAVENDER, BARNES and DOOLIN, JJ., concur.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Echols v. Reeburgh

    62 Okla. 67 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1916

    Board of Com’rs of Woodward Co. v. Thyfault, 43 Okla. 82 , 141 Pac. 409 . … Condit v. Condit, 66 Oklahoma, 168 Pac. 456 ; Bolling v. Campbell, 36 Okla. 671 , 128 Pac. 1091 ; Scott v. Brown, 40 Okla. 184 , 137 Pac. 113 .

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • TOBACCO SETTLEMENT ENDOWMENT TRUST FUND v. STITT

    2026 OK 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 2026

    Bd. of Regents v. McCloskey Bros, Inc. , 2009 OK 90 227 P.3d 133 Lujan , 504 U.S. at 562 . ¶14 Plaintiff TSET is made up of the seven-member Board. … . # 52 of Oklahoma Cnty. v. Hofmeister , 2020 OK 56 473 P.3d 475 may change the composition of the TSET board of directors. The text of Okla. Const. art.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Chatman v. State

    716 P.2d 258 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 1986

    Love v. State, 360 P.2d 954 (Okl.Cr.1960). … In Manson v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Morningside Hospital & Training School for Nurses v. Carmichael

    185 Okla. 48 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1938

    , citing City of Enid v. … See, also, State v. State ex rel. Shull, 142 Okla. 293 , 286 P. 891 , wherein the methods for redress to the property owner are discussed. See, also, Ivester v. State ex rel.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • REV. DR. MITCH RANDALL v. LINDEL FIELDS

    2025 OK 91 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 2025

    Dutton v. … Head v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Marsh v. Terra International (Oklahoma), Inc.

    122 F. Supp. 3d 1267 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jul 9, 2015

    During relevant times, Bill Brown (“Brown”) was the Production Manager at the Verdigris facility. Prior to Dees taking over supervision of Marsh, Marsh had informed Cloud of his bad knee. … J. 22), the Tenth Circuit’s "regarded as” test in Jones v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 502 F.3d 1176, 1190 (10th Cir.2007), was superseded by the ADAAA. See Brown v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. State

    23 Okla. 94 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1909

    Along this loading or .house track were located the elevator of the Ghickasha Milling Company, coalhouses, stockyards, Stephenson-Brown Lumber Company, and some other structures. … R. v. Jacobson, 179 U. S. 287 , 21 Sup. Ct. 115, 45 L. Ed. 194 , and Gladson v. Minnesota, 166 U. S. 427 , 17 Sup. Ct. 627, 41 L.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Meyer v. Jones

    203 Okla. 160 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1950

    State Election Board, 203 Okla. 132 , 218 P. 2d 617 ; Champagne v. Democratic Parrish Executive Committee (La. App.) 192 So. 120 ; State v. Hall, 26 Wash. 2d 172 , 173 P. 2d 153 ; Rasin v. … Such a board can *163 exercise only such power as is conferred upon it by law. On the points see: Moore v. Vincent et al., 174 Okla. 339 , 50 P. 2d 388 ; Yocham v. County Election Board, 198 Okla. 588 , 180 P. 2d 831 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Choctaw Electric Co-Operative, Inc. v. Redman

    293 P.2d 564 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 22, 1954

    Edwards v. … It is held in Valley City Salt Co. v. Brown, 7 W. Va. 191 , that the expression `public utility' is synonymous with `public use'". Such opinion has been cited with approval many times.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Richardson v. Penny

    6 Okla. 328 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1897

    (Barto v. Atibe, 16 Ohio 408 ; Brown v. Burdick, 25 Ohio St. 260 .) … And in Brown v. Burdick, 25 Ohio St. 260 , (so cited,) it is held: “In an action of forcible detainer, a complaint alleging That the said C. W.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Babb v. Independent School District No. I-5 of Rogers County

    63 O.B.A.J. 1054 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1992

    See Pickens County Board of Education v. Keasler, 263 Ala. 231 , 82 So.2d 197, 199 (1955); Board of School Trustees v. O'Brien, 190 A.2d 23 (Del.1963); Hankenson v. … Board of School Trustees v. O’Brien, supra note 11 at 27; Watson v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ball v. Harnischfeger Corp.

    65 O.B.A.J. 2050 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1994

    In Wayne Township Board of Educ. v. … Arkansas, Brown v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.