Case law

District of Columbia v. Green

687 A.2d 220 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 1997

District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Dep’t v. … In part quoting from Brown v.

NCRNC, LLC v. NLRB

94 F.4th 67 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 1, 2024

Chamber of Commerce v. Brown, 554 U.S. 60, 67–68 (2008). … Corp v. NLRB, 995 F.2d 257, 266 (D.C.

Hill v. Dist. of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment

150 A.3d 1282 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 2016

Butler v. Metropolitan Police Department

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 2020

See generally, e.g., Brown v. … .”); Murphy v.

Cazada G. D. Saylor v. United States Board of Parole, R. A. Chappell, Chairman

345 F.2d 100 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 1, 1965

This issue was raised in the District Court by a civil complaint for declaratory relief against the members of the United States Board of Parole, which action was dismissed pursuant to a grant of defendants’ motion for summary … upon the demand of the law violator alone, entail any sacrifice by the federal government of its right to exact full satisfaction of the penalties imposed for crimes against it, seems to us to be the teaching of Jenkins v.

Foster v. Massey

407 F.2d 343 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 1968

See Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 330 U.S. 469 , 67 S.Ct. 801 , 91 L.Ed. 1028 (1947); Voehl v. Indemnity Ins. Co., 288 U.S. 162 , 53 S.Ct. 380 , 77 L.Ed. 676 (1933); Clark v. Commercial Casualty Ins. … O’Keeffe v. Smith, Hinchman and Grylls Associates, 380 U.S. 359 , 85 S.Ct. 1012 , 13 L.Ed.2d 895 (1965); O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, 340 U.S. 504 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951); Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual Ins.

Laborers' District Council Of Georgia And South Carolina v. National Labor Relations Board

501 F.2d 868 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 19, 1974

A.F. of L. v. NLRB, 308 U.S. 401, 410 , 60 S.Ct. 300, 304 , 84 L.Ed. 347 (1940). The Board has been entrusted with complete control of election proceedings. Excelsior Laundry v. … There is a broad presumption in favor of the remedy chosen by the Board. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. NLRB, 313 U.S. 177 , 61 S.Ct. 845 , 85 L.Ed. 845 (1941); NLRB v. Rutter Rex Mfg.

In Re Howes

39 A.3d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 2012

Maryland, and Giglio v. … Brown, 726 P.2d 638, 640-41 (Colo. 1986) (prosecutor disbarred for convictions involving dishonesty and abuse of public office).

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Brandt Airflex Corporation and U. S. Fire Insurance Company and John F. Delinski, John F. Delinski v. Brandt Airflex Corporation, Employer/respondent, and U. S. Fire Insurance Company, Carrier/respondent, and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Brandt Airflex Corporation, Employer, and U. S. Fire Insurance Company, Carrier v. John F. Delinski, and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

645 F.2d 1053 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 1981

Brown v. Gesellschaft Fur Drahtlose Telegraphie, 104 F.2d 227, 228 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 307 U.S. 640 , 59 S.Ct. 1033 , 83 L.Ed. 1521 (1939); cf. Potomac Passengers Ass'n v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. … O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951).

Raven v. Sajet

334 F. Supp. 3d 22 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 19, 2018

Browning v. Clinton , 292 F.3d 235 , 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). To avoid dismissal, "a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." … Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc. , 789 F.3d 146 , 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). Yet the ultimate standard remains the same.

Anita Smith v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, Paul R. Ignatius, Secretary of the Navy

435 F.2d 433 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 28, 1970

Neumeyer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 187 Pa.Super. 321, 328 , 144 A.2d 606, 609 (1958). … See Constantopoulos v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security, 107 N.H. 400 , 223 A.2d 418 (1966).

Morgan v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2026

its arguments regarding the rulings in Brown[ v. … Mem. at 10; see Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497, 498–99 (1954), supplemented sub nom. Brown v. Bd. of Educ. of Topeka, Kan., 349 U.S. 294 (1955); see also Speed v. Mills, 919 F.

Youssef v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

541 F. Supp. 2d 121 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2008

See Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … In Brown v. Brody, the D.C.

United States Department of State v. Coombs

482 F.3d 577 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 2007

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 844 (1984). But State argues that the phrase “falsely prejudicial” is in no way susceptible to the Board’s interpretation. … State relies heavily on Brown v.

Heagney v. Garland

District Court, District of Columbia · May 22, 2025

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (cleaned up). … (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1999)); Chambers v. District of Columbia, 35 F.4th 870, 882 (D.C. Cir. 2022) (“For these reasons, we overrule Brown[.]”).

Pinto v. VESSEL" SANTA ISABEL"

492 F. Supp. 689 · District Court, Canal Zone · May 27, 1980

At the same time plaintiff’s longshore crew boarded the vessel, so did a clean-up crew. … United States v. Brown, 555 F.2d 407 (5th Cir. 1977); Dore v. Kleppe, 522 F.2d 1369 (5th Cir. 1975). A conflict in the reported cases suggest that this court should fully explore the issue. Some statements in Edmonds v.

Robert O. Clouser, as Members of the Board of Zoning Adjustment v. King David

309 F.2d 233 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 4, 1962

The Board denied a variance and the plaintiff filed a complaint for injunctive relief against the Board. … Such facts alone do not bring a case within the Board’s authority to allow a variance.

Local Union No. 1229, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

202 F.2d 186 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 4, 1953

National Labor Relations Board v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp., 1939, 306 U.S. 240, 255 , 59 S.Ct. 490, 496 . 10 . National Labor Relations Board v. … See National Labor Relations Board v. Virginia Power Co., 1941, 314 U.S. 469, 479-480 , 62 S.Ct. 344 , 86 L.Ed. 348 ; Continental Oil Co. v.

Cobb v. United States

104 F. Supp. 3d 61 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 2015

Board of Parole,” id., which utilized “a numerical scoring system . . . to guide the Board in making the [discretionary] decision to grant or deny parole.” McRae v. Hyman, 667 A.2d 1356, 1360 (D.C. 1995). … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002); see Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39-40 (D.C.

James Brown, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Secretary of the Army, Appellant/cross-Appellee

86 F.3d 225 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 1996

’s fees is not to be applied retroactively, see 78 F.3d 645 (D.C.Cir.1996), is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Irwin v. … Recall that the Congress enacted the interest provision in direct response to the Supreme Court’s decision in Library of Congress v.