Case law

Hillman v. Brown

2018 Ohio 2409 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2018

[Cite as Hillman v. Brown, 2018-Ohio-2409.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. Robert L. … Grove v.

William F. Allen, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

237 F.3d 1368 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Feb 2, 2001

Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156, 1159 (Fed. Cir.1997); Travelstead, 978 F.2d at 1247-49 . … This case is thus distinguishable from Winn v. Brown, 110 F.3d 56 (Fed.Cir. 1997). In Winn , the veteran challenged the validity of a regulation. Id at 57.

Tafari v. Brown

47 A.D.3d 979 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 29, 2008

Significantly, these witnesses executed refusal forms signifying their desire not to testify, and petitioner did not object to the genuineness of their refusals at the hearing (see Matter of Gonzalez v West, 29 AD3d 1245, … 1246 [2006] ) or to the Hearing Officer’s failure to make a further inquiry regarding the same (see Matter of Brown v Selsky, 37 AD3d 891, 891 [2007]).

Frank v. State

97 P.3d 86 · Court of Appeals of Alaska · Aug 27, 2004

State Board of Fisheries, 886 P.2d 632, 636-37 (Alaska 1994); Kelly v. Zamarello, 486 P.2d 906, 911 (Alaska 1971). 4 . Gudmundson v. State, 763 P.2d 1360, 1363 (Alaska App.1988). Cf. Beran v. … .”); Noden v.

Brown v. State

955 S.W.2d 276 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 10, 1997

Brown, swpra at 567 (cit *278 ing Garcia v. State, 605 S.W.2d 565 (Tex.Cr.App.1980)). … Brown, supra, at 568 . Finally, the court of appeals cited Whitehead v.

State v. Brown

389 S.C. 84 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Jun 2, 2010

V. … State v.

State v. Yates

168 P.3d 359 · Washington Supreme Court · Sep 27, 2007

Brown, 132 Wash.2d at 608 , 940 P.2d 546 (quoting State v. … Dutton v. Brown, 812 F.2d 593, 595 (10th Cir.1987) (emphasis added). See also State v.

Brown v. Kayser

60 Wis. 1 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1884

Doe v. Por ter, 3 Term, 16; Doe v. Bell, 5 Term, 471; Bradley v. Covel, 4 Cow., 350 ; Jackson v. Salmon, 4 Wend., 327 ; Conway v. Starkweather, 1 Denio, 113 ; Pugsley v. Aikin, 11 R. Y., 494; Schuyler v. Smith, 51 N. … Doe v. Smaridge, 7 Q. B., 957; Tress v. Savage, 4 El. & Bl., 36; Hanchet v. Whitney, 1 Vt., 311 ; Currier v. Perley, 24 N. H., 224; Hall v. Myers, 43 Md., 446 ; Prickett v. Ritter, 16 Ill., 97 ; Stedman v.

People v. Brown

229 N.E.3d 540 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 21, 2023

People v. Brown, 2018 IL App (1st) 151377-U. ¶4 On December 14, 2018, the defendant filed a petition seeking relief under the Act, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. … People v. Brown, 2021 IL App (1st) 190705-U. ¶5 On December 1, 2021, the defendant, acting pro se, filed a pleading entitled “Notice of Recapitulation under a Successive Post Conviction Petition.”

Brown v. State

475 S.W.2d 938 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 26, 1971

Brown and Birdie Brown, shown by the evidence to be his parents. The appellant urges 30 grounds of error. Among these grounds of error appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction. … Brown and Birdie McCauley Brown by manner and means and weapon or weapons unknown to the Grand Jurors aforesaid.”

State v. Brown

902 S.W.2d 278 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 25, 1995

The record clearly indicates that Brown received his warnings under Miranda v. … In State v.

People v. Brown

483 Mich. 895 · Michigan Supreme Court · Feb 24, 2009

Brown v. Flowe

349 N.C. 520 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 31, 1998

Brown v. Flowe, 128 N.C. App. 668, 674 , 496 S.E.2d 830, 834 (1998). On 8 July 1998 this Court allowed plaintiff’s petition for discretionary review. … See Board of Adjust. v. Town of Swansboro, 334 N.C. 421, 427 , 432 S.E.2d 310, 313 (1993). Our task is to give effect, if possible, to all sections of each statute and to harmonize them into one law on the subject.

Jolliefe v. Brown

14 Wash. 155 · Washington Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1896

Co. v. Crider, 91 Tenn. 489 ( 19 S. W. 618 ); Gulf, etc., Ry. Co. v. Ellis, 18 S. W. 723 ; Jacksonville, etc., Ry. Co. v. … Co. v.

State v. Brown

192 So. 3d 720 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 22, 2016

As this court noted in State v. … Id., 93-2839, p. 12; 642 So.2d at 1220 (citing State v. Phillips, 343 So.2d 1047 (La.1977)), See generally Williams v.

People v. Brown

80 N.Y.2d 729 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 1993

Defendant notes that this Court, in developing its excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule, has accepted Dean Wigmore’s analysis (see, e.g., People v Brown, 70 NY2d 513, 518 ; People v Marks, 6 NY2d 67, 71-72 ). … Brown, 70 NY2d 513, 518 , supra).

Parkerson v. Brown

430 S.W.3d 864 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 4, 2013

In 1997, the Choates bought the Fullerton property and commissioned a survey, which reflected their 1 Parkerson v. Brown, 2013 Ark. App. 297. 2 Parkerson v. Brown, 2010 Ark. … Brown 10 Tadlock v. Moncus, 2013 Ark. App. 363, __ S.W.3d __. 11 (2013). 12 Carr v. Gen.

Ford v. United States

533 A.2d 617 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1987

The premise of our adversarial system is that appellate courts do not sit as self-directed boards of legal inquiry and research, but essentially as arbiters of legal questions presented and argued by the parties before them … See Harris v.

Brown v. Lynch

1 Paige Ch. 147 · New York Court of Chancery · Aug 5, 1828

Nelson v. McDonald & others, 6 John. Ch. R. 201.) The agreement between Brown and the Lynches was void for want of mutuality. • It could not have been enforced by Brown. (Tucker v. Woods, 12 John. R. 190.) … (Prec. in Chan. 519; Rice v. Peet, 15 John. 503 ; Botsford v. Burr, 2 John. Ch. R. 405.) Where there is a part payment of money, there will be a resulting trust pro tanto. Here was a fraud committed by Brown.

State v. Moore

909 N.E.2d 1053 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Jul 22, 2009

See e.g., Ratliff v. … State v. Brown, 840 N.E.2d 411, 414 (Ind.Ct.App.2006) (quoting Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Scott, 497 N.E.2d 557, 559 (Ind.1986)).