Case law

Daniels v. Board of Regents for the University of Oklahoma

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 10, 2023

Alvarado v. KOB–TV, L.L.C., 493 F.3d 1210, 1215 (10th Cir. 2007). The Court, however, need not accept as true conclusory allegations. Erikson v. Pawnee Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. … See Jojola v.

Marland v. Hoffman

184 Okla. 591 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1939

Board of Com’rs of Seminole County v. State ex rel. Cobb (1912) 31 Okla. 196 , 120 P. 913 ; 18 R. C. L. 126, sec. 39; 38 C. J. 608, sec. 85. … Witt v. Wentz (1930) 142 Okla. 128 , 286 P. 796 ; Purcell-Lexington Toll Bridge Co. v. Leeper (1931) 148 Okla. 27 , 296 P. 969 ; 38 C. J. 582, sec. 56.

Quinton Belief Oil & Gas Co. v. Corporation Commission

101 Okla. 164 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 19, 1924

Board of Equalization v. First State Bank, 77 Okla. 291 , 188 Pac. 115 . … Brown v. Miller et al., 89 Okla. 287 , 215 Pac. 748 .

Daniels v. Board of Regents for the University of Oklahoma

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 10, 2023

) ) THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE ) UNIVERSITY … See Jojola v.

TREAT v. STITT

481 P.3d 240 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 2021

, Board of Public Affairs, Board of Chiropody, Board of Pharmacy, Election Board, Board of Education, Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma, Board of Regents of Oklahoma College for Women, Board of Regents of Northeastern … Johnson Discussed 2007 OK 27 , 163 P.3d 512 , FENT v. CONTINGENCY REVIEW BOARD Discussed 2009 OK 6 , 212 P.3d 447 , COSSEY v. CHEROKEE NATION ENTERPRISES, LLC Discussed at Length 2009 OK 51 , 230 P.3d 488 , GRIFFITH v.

Summey v. Tisdale

658 P.2d 464 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1982

Our decision in Neel v. Board of County Commissioners of Cherokee County, Okl., 617 P.2d 201 [1980] is not applicable here. The controversy in Neel centered around a budget request for the 1977-1978 fiscal year. … Nixon v. Roberts, Okl., 420 P.2d 898, 903 [1966], 27 .Board of County Commissioners of Nowata County v. Price, Okl., 385 P.2d 479, 482 [1963]; Nixon v. Roberts, supra note 26.

Appeal of National Bank of Tulsa

312 P.2d 495 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1957

Co. v. … Thereunder, the same presumption of correctness was accorded the deci *500 sion of the board, McBirney v.

WOOD v. MERCEDES-BENZ OF OKLAHOMA CITY

336 P.3d 457 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 2014

Brown v. … First, quoting Brown v.

Ridinger v. State

97 Okla. Crim. 377 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 1953

See, also, many other cases which support these rules of law, including Gorum v. State, 60 Okla. Cr. 248 , 63 P. 2d 765 ; Edwards v. State, 46 Okla. Cr. 77 , 288 P. 359 ; Brown v. State, 9 Okla. … Cr. 382 , 132 P. 359 ; Choate v. State, 12 Okla. Cr. 560 , 160 P. 34 , L.R.A. 1917A, 1287 ; Leeks v. State, 95 Okla. Cr. 326 , 245 P. 2d 764, 765 . In Leeks v.

Prince Co. v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.

110 Okla. 141 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 26, 1925

Emeric v. Alvarado (Cal.) 2 Pac. 418 . "A tax cannot bo mp sed i.vithont fix'nv the rate.” State v. Board of Examiners (Mont.) 104 Pac. 1055 . … Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. West, Atty.

Anderson v. State

21 Okla. Crim. 193 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 1922

In Payne v. State, 10 Okla. … See, also: Vance v. Territory, 3 Okla. Cr. 208 , 105 Pac. 307 ; Snyder Co-op. Ass’n v.

Cochran v. Norris

175 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1935

Counsel has failed to cite any authorities on this question, Out this court, in Board of County Commissioners of Garvin County et al. v. … Rep. 249 ; McIndoo v. Brown et al., 125 Okla. 88 , 256 P. 743 ; Whitehead v. Stephens, 54 Okla. 337 , 152 P. 445 ; Power & Irrigation Co. of Clearlake v. Capay Ditch Co., 226 Fed. 634 ; Levy v.

Question Submitted by: The Honorable Andy Fugate, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 94

2026 OK AG 7 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 8, 2026

Fund v. Stitt , 2026 OK 1 583 P.3d 280 2023 OK AG 5 See 2011 OK AG 11 Id. § 40(C). … Fund v. Wade , 2008 OK 15 180 P.3d 1205 60 O.S.2021, § 175.68 B.

Bailey v. Privett

64 Okla. 56 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1917

Brown, and against the plaintiffs and the defendant Beidleman. John L. Maynard and ffm. S. … In the case of Lyon v. Lyon, supra, this court also called attention to the fact that in the Porter v.

Cox v. Dawson

67 O.B.A.J. 542 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 1996

Janson v. Fulton, 162 N.W.2d 438, 442 (Iowa 1968); Bush v. Oliver, 86 Idaho 380 , 386 P.2d 967, 970 (1963); Farris v. Libby, 141 Me. 362 , 44 A.2d 216, 218 (1945); People v. … Ledbetter v. Alcoholic Bev. Laws Enforcement, 764 P.2d 172, 179 (Okla.1988); LeFlore v. Reflections of Tulsa, Inc., 708 P.2d 1068, 1075 (Okla.1985); Johnson v. Johnson, 674 P.2d 539, 542 (Okla.1983); Farris v.

Pancoast v. Eldridge

157 Okla. 195 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 24, 1932

Brown, deceased; (b) the death of Brown, and (c) failure of ¡Drown to make a will devising and bequeathing his property to plaintiff. … transaction had between himself and the deceased Brown. This was error. There exists a conflict in the rule in this jurisdiction upon this point.

PURCELL v. PARKER

475 P.3d 834 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 2020

Carlile Trust v. … BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA v. LUCAS Discussed 2015 OK 35, 357 P.3d 470, CROWNOVER v. KEEL Discussed 2000 OK 82, 13 P.3d 484, 71 OBJ 2668, IN THE MATTER OF A.M. & R.W.

Saunders v. Mullen

31 Okla. 19 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1911

Farris, Pruitt, and Brown. … This court has followed Strange et al. v. Crismon, supra, in Weisbender et al. v. School District No. 6 Caddo County, 24 Okla. 173 , 103 Pac. 639 ; John v. Paulin et al., 24 Okla. 636 , 104 Pac. 365 ; Hughes v.

Driskill v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 14, 2021

Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma (University) moves to dismiss certain claims alleged against it by plaintiff Leslie Driskill (Driskill). Doc. no. 8. … See, e.g., Garcia v.

Searcy v. State Ex Rel. Carl

64 Okla. 257 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 8, 1917

Leader Printing Co. v. Territory, 6 Okla. 302 , 50 Pac. 1001 ; Allen et al. v. Reed et al., 10 Okla. 105 , 60 Pac. 782 , 63 Pac. 867 ; Brewer et al. v. Rust, 20 Okla. 776 , 95 Pac. 233 . But, as said in Jefferson v. … Bailey, 13 Allen (Mass.) 541; Ham v. Boston Board of Police, 142, Mass. 90, 7 N. E. 540 .