Case law

Brown v. People

56 V.I. 695 · Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · May 24, 2012

Williams v. People, 55 V.I. 721, 727 (V.I. 2011). Because the Superior Court’s March 10,2011 Judgment and Commitment is a final judgment, we have jurisdiction over Brown’s appeal. See, e.g., Browne v. People, S. Ct. … See Murrell v.

State v. Brown

169 Wash. 2d 195 · Washington Supreme Court · Jul 15, 2010

Per Curiam ¶1 — Maurice Brown seeks review of an unpublished Court of Appeals decision affirming his conviction for escape. State v. Brown, noted at 153 Wn. App. 1003 , 2009 WL 3739446 , 2009 Wash. App. LEXIS 2816 . … But the Court Appeals went on to hold that Brown was not prejudiced by the failure to allege the knowledge element. This is not the proper analysis. See State v. Marcum, 116 Wn.

State v. Brown

2019 Ohio 4753 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 2019

[Cite as State v. Brown, 2019-Ohio-4753.] … BROWN and NELSON, JJ., concur.

People v. Brown

16 Cal. Rptr. 3d 447 · California Supreme Court · Aug 2, 2004

Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 19 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ].) … (Green v.

Sandomire v. Brown

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 2024

DAVID EDWARD BROWN and LANHUA KAO BROWN, Defendants-Appellants APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 1CC151002267) ORDER DENYING MOTION … Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration filed on April 3, 2024, by Defendants-Appellants David Edward Brown and Lanhua Kao Brown (Appellants), it appears that: (1) Appellants move for reconsideration

State v. Brown

103 N.E.3d 32 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 2017

[Cite as State v. Brown, 2017-Ohio-9259.] … State v. Brown, 11th Dist. Lake No. 2014-L-037, 2016-Ohio-1358, ¶33 (internal citations omitted).

People v. Brown

85 A.D.3d 940 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 14, 2011

Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant’s release to parole did not render the instant appeal academic (see People v Overton, 86 AD3d 4 [2d Dept 2011]; but see People v Orta, 73 AD3d 452 [2010]). … AD3d 868 [2011]; People v Williams, 82 AD3d 796 [2011]; People v Hill, 82 AD3d 77 [2011]; People v Sosa, 81 AD3d 464 [2011], lv granted 16 NY3d 863 [2011]).

State v. Brown

732 Utah Adv. Rep. 14 · Court of Appeals of Utah · Apr 18, 2013

Brown did not make a  State v. Brown motion to withdraw his guilty pleas at any time prior to sentencing. … See State v. Rhinehart, 2007 UT 61, ¶¶ 12–14, 167 P.3d 1046; see also Grimmett v.

People v. Brown

2021 NY Slip Op 01339 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 4, 2021

People v Brown ( 2021 NY Slip Op 01339 ) People v Brown 2021 NY Slip Op 01339 Decided on March 04, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … Ind No. 933/14 933/14 Appeal No. 13248 Case No. 2019-3447 [*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tasheem Brown, Defendant-Appellant. Robert S.

Brown v. Haertel

210 Wis. 345 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1932

Mertens v. Lake Shore Y. C. & T. Co. 195 Wis. 646 , 218 N. W. 85 ; Nicholson v. Schroeder, 202 Wis. 517 , 232 N. W. 872 ; Pettera v. Collins, 203 Wis. 81 , 233 N. W. 5451 Thieme v. Weyker, 205 Wis. 578 , 238 N. W. 389 . … The court so decided in Dohr v. Wisconsin Central R.

DeLeonardis v. Brown

15 A.D.3d 525 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 22, 2005

In granting the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, the Supreme Court correctly observed that the defendants’ submission of an affirmation instead of an affidavit by the defendant Van Madison Brown (hereinafter Van Madison … Thus, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the defendant’s motion which was, in effect, for leave to renew (see Wester v Sussman, 304 AD2d 656 [2003]; Lauer v Rapp, 190 AD2d 778

People v. Brown

483 Mich. 895 · Michigan Supreme Court · Feb 24, 2009

Horst v. Brown

72 A.D.3d 434 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 6, 2010

Kelsey, 24 AD3d 918, 919-920 [2005]; Allen v Matthews, 266 AD2d 782, 784 [1999]; Adsit v Quantum Chem. … Co. v Nigro Bros., 222 AD2d 574 [1995]; Rogoff v San Juan Racing Assn., 77 AD2d 831 [1980], affd 54 NY2d 883 [1981]).

State v. Brown

902 S.W.2d 278 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 25, 1995

The record clearly indicates that Brown received his warnings under Miranda v. … In State v.

Thompson v. Brown

4 Johns. Ch. 619 · New York Court of Chancery · Dec 7, 1820

The plaintiffs sue as assignees of Kellogg if Sprague, who were simple contract creditors of Brown if Fay. … F. is admitted to be insolvent, and the bill is against the administrators and infant heirs of 'Brown; it calls upon the former to discover and account for the personal estate, and of Brown’s share of the stock in trade belonging

Brown v. State

897 A.2d 748 · Supreme Court of Delaware · Apr 6, 2006

State, 798 A.2d at 1022 ; Hope v. State, 570 A.2d 1185, 1189 (Del.1990); Bowe v. State, 514 A.2d 408, 410 (Del.1986). 17 . Steckel v. State, 711 A.2d at 11 (quoting Fanning v. … .”); Floray v. State, 720 A.2d 1132, 1137 (Del.1998). 22 . United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. at 734 , 113 S.Ct. 1770 (federal plain error rule). See also Brown v. State, 729 A.2d 259, 265 (Del.1999); Stevenson v.

State v. Brown

2025 Ohio 668 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 2025

[Cite as State v. Brown, 2025-Ohio-668.] … State v. Brown, 2023-Ohio-3906 (5th Dist.).

People v. Brown

247 Cal. App. 4th 1430 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 10, 2016

Defendant and appellant Charles Lee Brown asserts that an ambiguous jury verdict form mandates reversal of his conviction on one count of felony resisting or attempting to deter an executive officer in the performance of … Erdelen (1996) 46 Cal.App.4th 86, 91-92 [ 53 Cal.Rptr.2d 553 ]; People v. Murray (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 1783, 1789 [ 29 Cal.Rptr.2d 42 ]; People v. Hartsfield (1981) 117 Cal.App.3d 504, 508 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 794 ]).

Steve Huynh, Individually Yvonne Huynh, Individually Huynh Poultry Farm, LLC D/B/A Steve Thi Huynh Poultry Farm D/B/A Huynh Poultry Farm T & N Poultry Farm, LLC Thinh Bao Nguyen, Individually Timmy Huynh Poultry Farm Timmy Huynh, Individually And Sanderson Farms, Inc. v. Frank Blanchard, Angelia Snow, Tanya Berry, Kimberly Riley, John Miller, Amy Miller, Chad Martinez, Emily Martinez, Mersini Blanchard, Malakoff Properties, LLC, and Ronny Snow

Texas Supreme Court · Jun 7, 2024

Campbell v. Wilder, 487 S.W.3d 146, 152 (Tex. 2016) (quoting Repka v. Am. Nat. Ins. Co., 186 S.W.2d 977, 980 (Tex. 1945)). II. … (quoting Brown v. Petrolite Corp., 965 F.2d 38, 51 (5th Cir. 1992))). In my view, the Court’s analysis strays from a proper balancing of the equities in two important respects.

Brown v. Bradshaw

126 Ohio St. 3d 265 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 18, 2010

[Cite as Brown v. Bradshaw, 126 Ohio St.3d 265, 2010-Ohio-3758.] BROWN, APPELLANT, v. BRADSHAW, WARDEN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Brown v. Bradshaw, 126 Ohio St.3d 265, 2010-Ohio-3758.] … See Bozsik v. Hudson, 110 Ohio St.3d 245, 2006-Ohio-4356, 852 N.E.2d 1200, ¶ 7-9; State v.