Case law

Willamina Education Ass'n v. Willamina School District 30J

50 Or. App. 195 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 3, 1981

The standard of review applied by this Board is that enunciated by the National Labor Relations Board in Spielberg Manufacturing Co. and its progeny, adopted by this Board in Siegel v. … "The tests applied in deciding whether or not this Board should defer to a prior arbitration award in unfair labor practice cases are found in Siegal [sic] v. Gresham Grade Teachers Association, Case No.

Bondick v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 2, 2019

The Amended Complaint reasserts plaintiffs claims against the Board of Governors and also names the Chair of the Board of Governors, the Chair of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Chair of the … Wilson v, Lynch, 835, 5.3d 1083, 1090 & n.2.

Meier & Frank Co. v. Smith-Sanders

115 Or. App. 159 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 9, 1992

Marshall v. Wilson, 175 Or 506, 518 , 154 P2d 547 (1944). ‘The doctrine of estoppel is only intended to protect those who materially change their position in reliance upon another’s acts or representations.’ Bash v. … Eastmoreland Hospital v. Reeves, 94 Or App 698, 702 , 767 P2d 97 (1989).

Castro v. Maass

139 Or. App. 69 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 7, 1996

State of Oregon, 322 Or 101, 108 , 902 P2d 1137 (1995) (quoting Trujillo v. Maass, 312 Or 431, 435 , 822 P2d 703 (1991)). … Yeager v. Maass, 93 Or App 561, 564 , 763 P2d 184 (1988), rev den 307 Or 340 (1989). We conclude that it was not.

Furnish v. Montavilla Lumber Co.

124 Or. App. 622 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 1993

The Board order must “clearly and precisely state what it found to be the facts and fully explain why those facts lead it to the decision it makes. ’ ’ Home Plate, Inc. v. OLCC, supra, 20 Or App at 190 . … The order must state “a reasoned opinion based on explicit findings of fact. ’ ’ Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 205 , 752 P2d 312 (1988).

Hendryx v. School District No. 4

148 Or. 83 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1934

R. 1033; Ansorge v. Green Bay, 198 Wis. 320 ( 224 N. W. 119 ); Backie v. Cromwell Consol. School Dist., 186 Minn. 38 ( 242 N. W. 389 ); Guilford School Tp. v. Roberts, 28 Ind. App. 355 ( 62 N. E. 711 ); Short v. … J. 401, 403, §§ 337, 338 and 340; Ansorge v. Green Bay, supra; Backie v. Cromwell Consol. School Dist., supra; Guilford School Tp. v. Roberts, *89 supra; Funston v.

Baar v. Fairview Training Center

139 Or. App. 196 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 21, 1996

However, on July 9, 1993, the referee, relying on Lorenzen v. SAIF, 79 Or App 751 , 719 P2d 1336 , rev den 301 Or 667 (1986), and Maxine V. … Hicks v.

Corporation of the Sisters of Mercy v. Lane County

123 Or. 144 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1927

BROWN, J. Section 4235, Or. … Francis v. Board of Review, 231 Ill. 317 ( 83 N. E. 272 ), St. Joseph’s Hospital Assn. v. Ashland County, 96 Wis. 636 ( 72 N. W. 43 ), and State v. Powers, 10 Mo. App. 263 ( 74 Mo. 476 ).

Altamirano v. Woodburn Nursery, Inc.

133 Or. App. 16 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 15, 1995

The Board erred in upholding the denial. 1 Claimant next assigns error to the Board’s denial of interim compensation. … Cook v. Workers’ Compensation Department, supra, 306 Or at 138 . Therefore, the Board erred in applying OAR 436-10-005(1)(c) to deny claimant’s request for interim compensation.

Wright v. Employment Division

24 Or. App. 323 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 9, 1976

The Employment Appeals Board concluded that claimant did not have good cause to terminate her employment. The Board’s review of the referee’s determination is de novo on the record. Stevenson v. … Our review of the Board’s decision is for substantial evidence in the whole record. Western Amusement v. Springfield, 274 Or 37 , 545 P2d 592 (1976); Cantrell v.

State v. Hunter

58 Or. App. 99 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 8, 1982

The continuing validity of Brown as constitutionally requiring joinder of charges has been questioned elsewhere and need not be debated here. See State v. … If, however, the Brown joinder requirement is not of constitutional origin, we are apparently left with a “same evidence” test, State v.

Meyer v. Lord

37 Or. App. 59 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 6, 1978

In 1000 Friends v. … Rutherford v.

State v. McKat

15 Or. App. 180 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 29, 1973

State v. Fogle, 254 Or 268, 270-75 , 459 P2d 873 (1969). … See State v. Woodward, 1 Or App 338 , 462 P2d 685 (1969). Eeversed and remanded. ORS 41.360 (15). ORS 41.360 (14). ORS 43.330 (5); 43.370.

Edward Hines Lumber Co. v. Kephart

81 Or. App. 43 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 3, 1986

State v. Collis, 243 Or 222, 231 , 413 P2d 53 (1966). … Subsection (1) requires that the Board believe that “such action is justified.” The Supreme Court, in Holmes v. State Ind. Acc.

Johnston v. James River Corp.

91 Or. App. 721 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 1988

PER CURIAM In this workers’ compensation case, we review under the standards stated in Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). … See George v. Richard’s Food Center, 90 Or App 639 , 752 P2d 1309 (1988). When the Board reverses, adequate judicial review requires specific findings in the Board’s opinion substantiating its contrary conclusion.

Croman Corp. v. Serrano

163 Or. App. 136 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 1999

Altamirano v. Woodburn Nursery, Inc., 133 Or App 16 , 889 P2d 1305 (1995); Evanite Fiber Corp. v. Striplin, 99 Or App 353, 357 , 781 P2d 1262 (1989). … SAIF v. Beldon, 155 Or App 568, 574 , 904 P2d 300 (1998), rev den 328 Or 330 (1999) (footnote omitted).

State v. Hall

166 Or. App. 348 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 22, 2000

See State v. … See State v.

Johnson v. Hot Springs Land & Imp. Co.

76 Or. 333 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 1915

Murphy had dived off the spring-board three or four times before Johnson dived off the spring-board. Halvorsen testified: That he saw Johnson dive in. “He stood upon the board. … S.) 982); Bass v. Reitdorf, 25 Ind App. 650 ( 58 N. E. 95 ); 29 Cyc. 474.

Southwest Forest Industries v. Anders

299 Or. 205 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1985

” citing Stevens v. … SERVICE ON THE BOARD The Court of Appeals, sua sponte, dismissed this appeal for failure to serve the Board as required by ORS 656.298(3). The same reasoning employed by this court from *219 the time of Demitro v.

White v. Holman

44 Or. 180 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1904

In Butchers’ Union Co. v. Crescent City, 111 U. S. 746 (4 Sup. … Thus in Plumb v. Christie, 103 Ga. 686 ( 30 S. E. 759 , 42 L. R.