Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.38s
Central States Drivers Council v. National Labor Relations Board
267 F.2d 166 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1959
STATES DRIVERS COUNCIL, and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Over-the-Road and City Transfer Drivers, Helpers, Dockmen and Warehousemen, Local No. 147, Petitioners, v. … -C.I.O. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Williams, Gregory
233 F.3d 592 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 2000
At the end of his lengthy response, he added: "I am also a Board- certified pharmacist. I receive, maintain compound and dis- pense narcotic, as well as non-narcotic substances per pre- scription." … See Evans v. United States, 122 F.2d 461, 468-69 (10th Cir. 1941); Wagner v. United States, 118 F.2d 801, 802 (9th Cir. 1941); Prisament v. United States, 96 F.2d 865, 866 (5th Cir. 1938); Johnson v.
Cited 43 timesPublishedA.G. Becker Inc. v. Board of Governors of The Federal Reserve System
693 F.2d 136 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 1982
Becker, Inc. v. Board of Governors, 519 F.Supp. 602 (D.D.C.1981). . … Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Agnew, 329 U.S. 441, 450 , 67 S.Ct. 411, 415 , 91 L.Ed. 408 (1947) (Rutledge, J„ concurring). See Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System v. Investment Co.
Reversed by Securities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 468 U.S. 137 (1984)Cited 2 timesPublishedMoney Station, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
94 F.3d 658 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 1996
Cited 0 timesPublished145 F.2d 341 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 30, 1944
“The decision (findings of fact and conclusions of law) is the basis upon which the judgment of the court rests. * * * ” Mosley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., 1941, 45 N.M. 230 , 114 P.2d 740, 747 . … Edwards v. Bell, 1938, 343 Mo. 824 , 123 S.W.2d 83 .
Cited 3 timesPublished517 F. Supp. 2d 301 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 19, 2007
Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247, 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); see also Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Diamond v. … .”); Jones v.
Cited 16 timesPublished34 App. D.C. 9 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 1909
Brown. In the caveat as originally filed by appellant, she based her right to prosecute the contest upon her status as the lawful widow of said Brown. … Co. v. Adams, 9 Pet. 571 -601, 9 L. ed. 233—244; Van Ness v. Van Ness, 6 How. 62—67, 12 L. ed. 344—346; Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U. S. 3 , 27 L. ed. 73, 1 Sup. Ct. Rep. 15.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFresh & Easy Neighborhood Market, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
468 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 5, 2012
We must uphold the Board’s credibility determinations unless they are “hopelessly incredible or self-contradictory,” Teamsters Local Union No. 171 v. … Instead, the record fully supports the Board’s conclusion that, under the five factors established in Bourne v.
Cited 0 timesPublished128 F. Supp. 3d 302 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 11, 2015
P. 56(a); see also Anderson v. … United States v. Clarke, 628 F.
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited Transport Service Employees of America, Cio, Ex Rel. Washington v. National Mediation Board
179 F.2d 446 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 17, 1949
National Mediation Board, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 141 F.2d 366 (1944); United Transport Service Employees v. National Mediation Board, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 15 , 141 F.2d 724 (1944); National Federation v. … The craft or class determination of the Board was not the act of a state. Perry v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedUnited States ex rel. Dascomb v. Board of Tax Appeals of the United States
16 F.2d 337 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 6, 1926
Clair v. Conlon, 12 App. D. C. 161; Doyle v. District of Columbia, 45 App. D. C. 90; Texas P. R. Co. v. Murphy, 111 U. S. 488 , 4 S. Ct. 497 , 28 L. Ed. 492 ; Kingman v. Western Mfg. Co., 170 U. S. 675 , 18 S. … Com. v. Humboldt Steamship Co., 224 U. S. 474 , 32 S. Ct. 556 , 56 L. Ed. 849 ; Louisville Cement Co. v. Int. Com. Com., 246 U. S. 638 , 38 S. Ct. 408 , 62 L. Ed. 914 ; Kansas City Ry. v. Int. Com. Com., 252 U.
Cited 8 timesPublishedCotton v. District of Columbia
421 F. Supp. 2d 83 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 16, 2006
Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Re *86 lief & Development v. Ashcroft, 833 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren, 353 F.3d at 39 ; Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . B.
Cited 12 timesPublishedUnited Mine Workers of America Local Union 1329 v. National Labor Relations Board
812 F.2d 741 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1987
Union v. … The Board, however, did not attempt to conform its analysis to those cases. *744 For example, in International Union of Electrical Workers v.
Cited 9 timesPublished180 A.3d 86 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 2018
United States, 756 A.2d 380, 389 (D.C. 2000)); see also Ingram v. … See, e.g., Pace v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 2025
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668- 71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSheboygan County, a Municipal Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Manitowoc County, Intervenor
330 F.2d 232 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 12, 1964
It applied to the Civil Aeronautics Board for an order requiring scheduled air transportation to and from its airport, and made North Central a party to the proceeding. … The expert Board carefully spelled out the considerations which led to its conclusions. Its action has support in the record. Affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublished485 F.2d 917 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 29, 1973
FOR YEARS AT THE EMPORIUM BLACK, BROWN, YELLOW, AND RED PEOPLE, HAVE WORKED AT THE LOWEST JOBS, AT THE LOWEST LEVELS. … B. v. Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd., 349 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1965). 45 For these reasons the decision and order of the Board are reversed and remanded to the Board for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
Cited 12 timesPublishedInternational Union of Operating Engineers, Local 49, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
353 F.2d 852 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 4, 1965
National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp., 373 U.S. 221, 236 , 83 S.Ct. 1139 , 10 L.Ed.2d 308 (1963). … In National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 26 timesPublishedWood v. American Federation of Government Employees
255 F. Supp. 3d 190 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 2017
See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F. Supp. 2d 1473, 1475 (D.D.C. 1998) (quoting Kuwait Airways Corp. v. American Security Bank, N.A., 890 F.2d 456, 463 n.11 (D.C.Cir.1989)).
Cited 6 timesPublished420 F.2d 188 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 12, 1969
See United States v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256, 265 , 66 S.Ct. 1062 , 90 L.Ed. 1206 (1946) and Griggs v. Allegheny County, supra. … United States v. 15,909 Acres, 176 F.Supp. 447, 448 (S.D.Cal.1958). 7 . The final opinion of the Board appears in the Joint Appendix of the parties in the ease of National Capital Airlines v.
Cited 8 timesPublished
Ask Donna