Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

1.38s

  • Central States Drivers Council v. National Labor Relations Board

    267 F.2d 166 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1959

    STATES DRIVERS COUNCIL, and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Over-the-Road and City Transfer Drivers, Helpers, Dockmen and Warehousemen, Local No. 147, Petitioners, v. … -C.I.O. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Williams, Gregory

    233 F.3d 592 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 2000

    At the end of his lengthy response, he added: "I am also a Board- certified pharmacist. I receive, maintain compound and dis- pense narcotic, as well as non-narcotic substances per pre- scription." … See Evans v. United States, 122 F.2d 461, 468-69 (10th Cir. 1941); Wagner v. United States, 118 F.2d 801, 802 (9th Cir. 1941); Prisament v. United States, 96 F.2d 865, 866 (5th Cir. 1938); Johnson v.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • A.G. Becker Inc. v. Board of Governors of The Federal Reserve System

    693 F.2d 136 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 1982

    Becker, Inc. v. Board of Governors, 519 F.Supp. 602 (D.D.C.1981). . … Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Agnew, 329 U.S. 441, 450 , 67 S.Ct. 411, 415 , 91 L.Ed. 408 (1947) (Rutledge, J„ concurring). See Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System v. Investment Co.

    Reversed by Securities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 468 U.S. 137 (1984)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Money Station, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

    94 F.3d 658 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 1996

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lambros v. Young

    145 F.2d 341 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 30, 1944

    “The decision (findings of fact and conclusions of law) is the basis upon which the judgment of the court rests. * * * ” Mosley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., 1941, 45 N.M. 230 , 114 P.2d 740, 747 . … Edwards v. Bell, 1938, 343 Mo. 824 , 123 S.W.2d 83 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hairsine v. James

    517 F. Supp. 2d 301 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 19, 2007

    Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247, 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); see also Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Diamond v. … .”); Jones v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Richardson v. Reeves

    34 App. D.C. 9 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 1909

    Brown. In the caveat as originally filed by appellant, she based her right to prosecute the contest upon her status as the lawful widow of said Brown. … Co. v. Adams, 9 Pet. 571 -601, 9 L. ed. 233—244; Van Ness v. Van Ness, 6 How. 62—67, 12 L. ed. 344—346; Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U. S. 3 , 27 L. ed. 73, 1 Sup. Ct. Rep. 15.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    468 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 5, 2012

    We must uphold the Board’s credibility determinations unless they are “hopelessly incredible or self-contradictory,” Teamsters Local Union No. 171 v. … Instead, the record fully supports the Board’s conclusion that, under the five factors established in Bourne v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Picur v. Kerry

    128 F. Supp. 3d 302 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 11, 2015

    P. 56(a); see also Anderson v. … United States v. Clarke, 628 F.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United Transport Service Employees of America, Cio, Ex Rel. Washington v. National Mediation Board

    179 F.2d 446 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 17, 1949

    National Mediation Board, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 141 F.2d 366 (1944); United Transport Service Employees v. National Mediation Board, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 15 , 141 F.2d 724 (1944); National Federation v. … The craft or class determination of the Board was not the act of a state. Perry v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • United States ex rel. Dascomb v. Board of Tax Appeals of the United States

    16 F.2d 337 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 6, 1926

    Clair v. Conlon, 12 App. D. C. 161; Doyle v. District of Columbia, 45 App. D. C. 90; Texas P. R. Co. v. Murphy, 111 U. S. 488 , 4 S. Ct. 497 , 28 L. Ed. 492 ; Kingman v. Western Mfg. Co., 170 U. S. 675 , 18 S. … Com. v. Humboldt Steamship Co., 224 U. S. 474 , 32 S. Ct. 556 , 56 L. Ed. 849 ; Louisville Cement Co. v. Int. Com. Com., 246 U. S. 638 , 38 S. Ct. 408 , 62 L. Ed. 914 ; Kansas City Ry. v. Int. Com. Com., 252 U.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Cotton v. District of Columbia

    421 F. Supp. 2d 83 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 16, 2006

    Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Re *86 lief & Development v. Ashcroft, 833 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren, 353 F.3d at 39 ; Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . B.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • United Mine Workers of America Local Union 1329 v. National Labor Relations Board

    812 F.2d 741 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1987

    Union v. … The Board, however, did not attempt to conform its analysis to those cases. *744 For example, in International Union of Electrical Workers v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In re Brandi S. Nave

    180 A.3d 86 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 2018

    United States, 756 A.2d 380, 389 (D.C. 2000)); see also Ingram v. … See, e.g., Pace v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mallgren v. United States

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 2025

    P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668- 71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sheboygan County, a Municipal Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Manitowoc County, Intervenor

    330 F.2d 232 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 12, 1964

    It applied to the Civil Aeronautics Board for an order requiring scheduled air transportation to and from its airport, and made North Central a party to the proceeding. … The expert Board carefully spelled out the considerations which led to its conclusions. Its action has support in the record. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Western Addition Community Organization v. National Labor Relations Board, the Emporium Capwell Company, Interventor

    485 F.2d 917 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 29, 1973

    FOR YEARS AT THE EMPORIUM BLACK, BROWN, YELLOW, AND RED PEOPLE, HAVE WORKED AT THE LOWEST JOBS, AT THE LOWEST LEVELS. … B. v. Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd., 349 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1965). 45 For these reasons the decision and order of the Board are reversed and remanded to the Board for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 49, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

    353 F.2d 852 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 4, 1965

    National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp., 373 U.S. 221, 236 , 83 S.Ct. 1139 , 10 L.Ed.2d 308 (1963). … In National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Wood v. American Federation of Government Employees

    255 F. Supp. 3d 190 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 2017

    See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F. Supp. 2d 1473, 1475 (D.D.C. 1998) (quoting Kuwait Airways Corp. v. American Security Bank, N.A., 890 F.2d 456, 463 n.11 (D.C.Cir.1989)).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • The Palisades Citizens Association, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Washington Airways, Inc., Intervenor

    420 F.2d 188 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 12, 1969

    See United States v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256, 265 , 66 S.Ct. 1062 , 90 L.Ed. 1206 (1946) and Griggs v. Allegheny County, supra. … United States v. 15,909 Acres, 176 F.Supp. 447, 448 (S.D.Cal.1958). 7 . The final opinion of the Board appears in the Joint Appendix of the parties in the ease of National Capital Airlines v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.