Case law

McKee v. State

532 P.2d 472 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 1975

In Trantham v. … See, Bridgeman v. State, Okl.Cr., 496 P.2d 431 (1972) and Arriola v. State, Okl.Cr., 520 P.2d 690 (1973).

Taylor v. State

36 Okla. Crim. 436 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 1927

While this officer was on the running board, Stevenson unscrewed the top of the fruit jar, kicked it over, and the whisky ran over a sweater, and at the police station the Officer Gray squeezed a small quan-. tity out of … Cr. 519 , 103 P. 538 ; Sturgis v. State, 2 Okla. Cr. 326 , 190 P. 57 : Brown v. State, 4 Okla. Cr. 13 , 115 P. 603 .

In Re Tillman

157 Okla. 166 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 17, 1932

(Colbaugh v. U. S., 15 F. (2d) 929). The Board of Governors found that said cause comes within paragraph 3, section 4106, O. O'. … CLARK, V. O. J...- concurs in conclusion. LESTER, O. J., and RILEY and ANDREWS, JJ., absent. Note. — See under (2) 2 R. C. L. 939; R. O.'L. Perm. Supp. p. 581.

Ervin v. State

580 P.2d 1002 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 1978

Officer Chester Brown identified the exhibit as the same gun which he picked up at the scene and placed in a police unit. … In Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 518 P.2d 898 (1974), wherein the defendant complained of the chain of custody of a hydraulic jack, we stated: . .

Vogt v. Board of County Commissioners of McIntosh County, Oklahoma

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Dec 9, 2022

Defendant Board of County Commissioners concedes that Rodebush has final policy- making authority in operating the Clerk’s Office, and that the Board may be liable if Plaintiff shows a violation by Rodebush. … In Elrod v.

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. CLARK

2023 OK 27 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 2023

OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. … Bar Ass'n v. Kinsey , 2009 OK 31 212 P.3d 1186 Id . ¶ 16, 212 P.3d at 1192 (citing State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass'n v. Doris , 1999 OK 94 991 P.2d 1015 Id . Background Count I: Brown Grievance ¶12 Dennis Brown, Sr.'

Simington v. Parker

250 P.3d 351 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 2011

Vasek v. Board of County Commissioners of Noble County, 2008 OK 35 , 1 14, 186 P.3d 928, 932 . … City of Tulsa, 1986 OK 44, ¶ 5 , 721 P.2d 803, 805 ; Girdner v. Board of Commissioners of Cherokee County, 2009 OK CIV APP 94, ¶ 19 , 227 P.3d 1111 (man-date issued November 19, 2009).

WOOD v. MERCEDES-BENZ OF OKLAHOMA CITY

2014 OK 68 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 2014

Brown v. … First, quoting Brown v.

Rogers v. Lassiter, Adm'r.

196 Okla. 228 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 1945

Fairly illustrative of this line of authorities are the cases of Brown v. Durham, 175 Okla. 500 , 53 P. 2d 551 , and Crawford, County Treasurer, et al. v. McConnell et al., 173 Okla. 520 , 49 P. 2d 551 . … into with Brown.

Chickasha Inv. Co. v. Phillips

58 Okla. 760 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1916

it be presented to the board. . … Lane v. C., O. & G. Ry. Co., 19 Okla. 324 , 91 Pac. 883 ; Taylor v. Ins. Co. of North America, 25 Okla. 92 , 105 Pac. 354 , 138 Am. St. Rep. 906 ; Midland Sav. & L. Co. v. Sutton, 30 Okla. 448 , 120 Pac. 1007 ; Adams v.

In Re Hickman

63 Okla. 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 26, 1916

On this point, in Johnson v. … Holcomb v. C., R. *16 I. & P. R. Co., 27 Okla. 667 , 112 Pac. 1023 , is squarely in point. That ease involved the jurisdiction of the district court to entertain an appeal from a judgment of a justice of the peace.

Bilby v. Bean

42 Okla. 53 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1913

Laws 1910; Olds v. Conger, 1 Okla. 232 , 32 Pac. 337 ; McDonald v. Stiles, 7 Okla. 327 , 54 Pac. 487 ; Dysart v. Enslow, 7 Okla. 386 , 54 Pac. 550 ; Brown v. Hartshorn, 12 Okla. 121 , 69 Pac. 1049 ; Anderson v. … Ferguson, 12 Okla. 307 , 71 Pac. 225 ; Jones v. Seawell, 13 Okla. 711 , 76 Pac. 154 ; Zahn v. Obert, 24 Okla. 159 , 103 Pac. 702 ; Vansellous v. Huene, 26 Okla. 243 , 108 Pac. 1102 ; Turner v.

Terry v. State

7 Okla. Crim. 430 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1912

Brown as the owner of the whisky when it was received at the depot. … See Crawford v. Ferguson, 5 Okla. Cr. 378, 115 Pac. 278 .

Linn v. Barnett's Inc.

503 P.2d 1276 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1972

Most, if not all, of the rolls were wrapped in slick brown paper. … Almost directly west of the second stack there was a three-roll stack, all wrapped in slick brown paper.

State Ex Rel. Kehn v. Incorporated Town of Spavinaw City

150 Okla. 23 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1931

Riddings, County Attorney, v. … See, also, Board of Commissioners of Cherokee County v. Hatfield, 121 Okla. 28 , 247 Pac. 77 , and Parker v. Board of Commissioners of Tillman County, 41 Okla. 723 , 139 Pac. 981 .

Stearns v. State Ex Rel. Biggers

23 Okla. 462 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1909

Blodgett v. Board of Canvassers (Sup.) 19 N. Y. … Coll v. Board, 83 Mich. 367 , 47 N. W. 227 Roemer v. Board, 90 Mich. 27 , 51 N. W. 267 . These affidavits are ex parte, and cannot be considered upon this hearing.

Ray v. Oklahoma Furn. Mfg. Co.

170 Okla. 414 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1934

Libbey v. Brown (Me.) 7 Atl. 114 . The court in that case quotes approvingly what is said by Chief Justice Bigelow in Townsend Bank v. … That decision cited Mason v. Henry, 152 N. Y. 529 ; Simpson v. Brown-Desnoyers Shoe Co., 70 Ark. 598 ; Paine v. Dodds, 14 N. D. 189 ; Dielmann v. Citizens’ National Bank, 8 S. D. 263; Capen v. Woodrow, 51 Vt. 106 .

Phillips v. Williams

583 P.2d 488 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1978

United States Board of Parole, 167 U.S.App.D.C. 268 , 511 F.2d 1270 (1974); Cook v. Whiteside, 505 F.2d 32 (5th Cir. 1974); Mower v. Britton, 504 F.2d 396 (10th Cir. 1974); United States ex rel. Johnson v. … Monks v. State Board of Parole, 58 N. J. 238, 277 A.2d 193, 196 (1971).

EGLESTON v. McCLENDON

318 P.3d 210 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 2013

Miller, V. … In Mozes v.

State Ex Rel. King v. White

170 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 1934

Friend v. Cummings, 47 Okla. 44 , 147 P. 161 . No attention was paid to this act of the Legislature by this school district or school board at that time. … Co. v. Haynes, Co. Tr., 8 Okla. 576 , 58 P. 738 ; Union Sav. Ass’n v. Burns, 74 Okla. 1 , 176 P. 227 ; and Hollis v. Adams Gin Co., 115 Okla. 25 , 241 P. 744 ).