Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

1.89s

  • In Re Uchendu

    812 A.2d 933 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 2002

    Similarly, the jurat of Agnes Straughn’s Certificate of Completion stated “I, Agnes V. … Pointing to the scienter requirements for criminal forgery, see United States v. Gilbert, 140 U.S.App.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc.

    312 F. Supp. 472 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 16, 1970

    Conf. v. Noerr Motors, 365 U.S. 127 , 81 S.Ct. 523 , 5 L.Ed.2d 464 (1961), Mine Workers v. Pennington, 381 U.S. 657 , 85 S. Ct. 1585 , 14 L.Ed.2d 626 (1965), Parker v. … Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), Alabama Power Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bakery Wagon Drivers and Salesmen, Local Union No. 484 v. National Labor Relations Board

    321 F.2d 353 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 23, 1963

    Local 1976 United Brotherhood etc., Carpenters’ Union v. Labor Board, supra; National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Bldg. Council, supra, Note 9. … B. v. Guernsey-Muskingum Electric Co-Op., Inc., 6 Cir., 285 F.2d 8 (1960); Douds v. International Longshoremen’s Ass’n, 2 Cir., 241 F.2d 278 (1957); National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Chenault v. McHugh

    968 F. Supp. 2d 268 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 2013

    See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 4 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … the decision on reconsideration, instead it runs from the date of the adverse review board decision”) (citing Bethke v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Securities Industries Association v. Board Of Governors Of The Federal Reserve System

    900 F.2d 360 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 10, 1990

    Montana v. … The Board, drawing from our opinion in National Courier Ass'n v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Richardson v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 2019

    See Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 380 (2007). … Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 21 (1993).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Coca Cola Bottling Works, Inc.

    466 F.2d 380 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 28, 1972

    Local Union No. 1229, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 346 U.S. 464, 476 , 74 S.Ct. 172 , 98 L.Ed. 195 (1953) 9 NLRB v. Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 451 (8th Cir. 1963) 10 See, e. g., NLRB v. … Brown & Root, 132 NLRB 486 (1961), enforced 311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963); American Flint Glass Workers' Union v. NLRB, 97 U.S.

    Cited 205 timesPublished
  • United Hatters, Cap & Millinery Workers International Union v. National Labor Relations Board

    375 F.2d 325 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 1967

    Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 ; International Union of United Brewery, etc. v. N. L. R. … Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 379 U.S. 203, 216 , 85 S.Ct. 398 , 13 L.Ed.2d 233 ; N. L. R. B. v. Seven-Up Bottling Co., 344 U.S. 344, 346 , 73 S.Ct. 287 , 97 L.Ed. 377 ; *328 Phelps Dodge Corp. v. N. L. R.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • General Accounting Office v. General Accounting Office Personnel Appeals Board, Morris L. Shaller, Intervenor

    698 F.2d 516 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 18, 1983

    V 1981). 44 . 31 U.S.C. § 52 (a) (Supp. V 1981). 45 . … V 1981) (amended 1982) (requiring the General Counsel to investigate all matters within the Board’s jurisdiction on request of the Board or any member thereof, and to help the board carry out its duties and powers).

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Textile Workers Union of America, Cio, and Its Agents v. National Labor Relations Board

    227 F.2d 409 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 1955

    This case is here on the Union’s petition for review,- and the Board’s petition for enforcement, of a Board order. … International Union, UAW v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 336 U.S. 245 , 69 S.Ct. 516, 519 , 93 L.Ed. 651 , like this case, involved “intermittent and unannounced work stoppages”.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brug v. National Coalition for the Homeless

    45 F. Supp. 2d 33 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 1999

    Brown v. General Services Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). The Court agrees. … See Brown v. General Services Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 829-835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Graves, 961 F.Supp. at 322 . 12 .

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • In Re Daniel

    11 A.3d 291 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 2011

    See Disciplinary Counsel v. Wise, 108 Ohio St.3d 381 , 843 N.E.2d 1198, 1200 (2006). … The Board failed to note, however, that in all three of the cited cases, In re Powell, 898 A.2d 365 (D.C.2006), In re Wright, 885 A.2d 315 (D.C.2005), and In re Brown, 851 A.2d 1278 (D.C.2004), the Board not- only imposed

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • In re Howes

    52 A.3d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 2012

    Maryland, and Giglio v. … Brown, 726 P.2d 638, 640-41 (Colo.1986) (prosecutor disbarred for convictions involving dishonesty and abuse of public office).

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Doe v. Department of the Navy

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2026

    See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 151-52 (D.C. Cir. 2015). III. … See Brown v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 164 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Braun v. State of Montana

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 25, 2013

    Although mindful that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers, see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972), Brown v. … See Evans v. Suter, No. 09-5242, 2010 WL 1632902 (D.C. Cir. Apr. 2, 2010) (citing Hurt v. U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir., No. 07-5019, 2008 WL 441786 (D.C. Cir.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • American Council of the Blind v. Paulson

    581 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 3, 2008

    In American Council of the Blind v. … In such instances, in matters famous, see Brown v. Board of Educ., 349 U.S. 294, 300 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955), and obscure, see Henrietta D. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

    373 F.2d 671 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 25, 1967

    The Company, relying on Insurance Workers International Union v. … Ball v. N.L.R.B., 299 F.2d 683 , 689 (4th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Northern Virginia Sun Pub. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 369 U.S. 838 , 82 S. Ct. 868 , 7 L.Ed.2d 843 (1962).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Van Meter v. Barr

    778 F. Supp. 83 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 1991

    See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(c); Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1967 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). … Brown v.

    Cited 73 timesPublished
  • Pappas v. Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 2025

    Retirement Board decision remains pending. … Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). A court must consider all of a pro se litigant’s filings to determine if they meet the requirements of a specific motion. Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hyser v. Reed

    318 F.2d 225 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 11, 1963

    Summary judgment was granted in favor of the Parole Board and Jatoft appealed. Whitling v. … After he is returned to the federal prison the Parole Board grants him an “opportunity to appear.” See Glenn v. Reed, supra, and Reed v. Butter-worth, supra.

    Declined to follow by Mower v. Britton, 504 F.2d 396 (1974)Cited 190 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.