Case law

James v. Rogers

734 P.2d 1298 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1987

Although assuming, without deciding, the Board’s authorization of the amendment was quasi-judicial in character, Meyer v. … See State v. Haden, 349 Mo. 982 , 163 S.W.2d 946 (1942); State v. Meier, 115 N.W.2d 574 (N.D.1962); State v. Bogart, 73 Ohio App. 47 . 53 N.E.2d 75 (1943); In re Welsh, 458 Pa. 645 , 327 A.2d 6 (Pa.1974); Clegg v.

Minie v. Hudson

68 O.B.A.J. 909 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1997

Henry v. Ionic Petroleum Co., 391 P.2d 792, 794 (Okla.1964); Board of County Com’rs v. … Board of County Com’rs, 442 P.2d 297, 302 (Okla.1968). 28 . Tide 51 O.S.Supp.1992 § 156(D), see note 1, supra. 29 . Krokowski v. Henderson Nat'l Corp., 917 P.2d 8, 11 (Okla.1996); Grover v.

Inergy Propane, LLC v. Lundy

219 P.3d 547 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 13, 2008

Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. … Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 224 , 113 S.Ct. 2578, 2589 , 125 L.Ed.2d 168 (1993) (quoting Brown Shoe Co. v. U.S., 370 U.S. 294, 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1521 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962)).

Tulsa City Lines, Inc. v. Johnston

204 Okla. 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1951

Co. v. … Co. v.

Maule v. Independent School District No. 9

714 P.2d 198 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 24, 1985

A sanctioned election is one held with official permission of the Board the outcome of which the Board ratifies. Johns v. Allen, 231 F.Supp. 852, 857 (D.Del.1964). 5 . Draper v. … Connecticut State Board of Labor Relations, Twenty-First Annual Report 1-3 (1967). 10 . Stone v. Johnson, 690 P.2d 459, 462 (Okla.1984); See also Burlington Fire Fgtrs v.

Lee v. Cameron

67 Okla. 80 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1917

Carney, who were the sole and only stockholders on the date of the organization, and who composed the board of directors. … Stein v. Howard, 65 Cal. 616 , 4 Pac. 662 ; Mathis v. Pridham, 1 Tex. Civ. App. 58 , 20 S. W. 1015 ; Brown v. Duluth, etc., Ry. Co. (C. C.) 53 Fed. 889 ; Continental Trust Co. v. Toledo, etc., Ry. Co. (C.

HICKMAN v. STATE ex rel. SERVICE OKLAHOMA

2023 OK CIV APP 17 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 14, 2023

MUNN Discussed Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases Cite Name Level 1992 OK 72 , 833 P.2d 1218 , 63 OBJ 1507, Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc. Discussed 1997 OK 107 , 944 P.2d 930 , 68 OBJ 2775, HILL v. … BOARD OF EDUCATION Cited 1917 OK 397 , 166 P. 1058 , 64 Okla. 214 , CITY OF PAWHUSKA v. PAWHUSKA OIL & GAS CO. Discussed 2007 OK 38 , 160 P.3d 959 , LOWERY v. ECHOSTAR SATELLITE CORP.

Short v. State

634 P.2d 755 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1981

Bryne v. State, 620 P.2d 1328 (Okl.Cr.1980); Laughton v. State, 558 P.2d 1171 (Okl.Cr.1977). The ruling relied on in City of Tulsa v. … Brown, from which mortal wounds the same Vicki Marie Brown did languish and die on the 6th day of August, 1978.”

Wirtz v. Glanz

68 O.B.A.J. 338 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1996

The petition states that prisoner proceeds “under the protection of Haines v. … As stated in Lasiter v.

Bradford v. State

3 Okla. Crim. 367 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1910

Gardenhire v. Burdick, 7 Okla. 212, 54 Pac. 483 . In Brown v. … In Board of Commissioners of Day County v.

Overton v. State

95 Okla. Crim. 127 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1952

Brown were all in his automobile the night the collision occurred with Harper’s car. The defendant, Hoskins and Mrs. Overton were riding in the front seat and Brown in the back seat. … Lincoln v. State, 86 Okla. Cr. 415 , 193 P. 2d 618 . Complaint is made of the testimony of Officer Rankin wherein he swore that Mrs. Overton stated that Mr. Overton was driving the automobile of Overton.

Cartwright v. Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc.

593 P.2d 104 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 22, 1979

Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Brown, Okl., 477 P.2d 67 ; Miller Construction Co. v. Wenthold, Okl., 458 P.2d 637 . II. … Sooner Construction Co. v. Brown, Okl., 544 P.2d 500 ; Sinclair Oil & Gas Co. v. Cheatwood, Okl., 350 P.2d 944 . In Henry Chevrolet Co. v.

Landrigan v. State

700 P.2d 218 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 13, 1985

See Winters v. State, 545 P.2d 786 (Okl.Cr.1976), citing Holcomb v. State, 95 Okl.Cr. 55 , 239 P.2d 806 (1952). Accord Black v. State, 664 P.2d 1054 (Okl.Cr.1983). … Brannin v. State, 375 P.2d 276 (Okl.Cr.1962). See also Caffey v. State, 661 P.2d 897 (Okl.Cr.1983).

Guthrie v. State

679 P.2d 278 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1984

Brown v. State, 481 P.2d 475 (Okl.Cr.1971). When implementing this standard, we consider the evidence and its inferences in a light most favorable to the State. Rudd v. State, 649 P.2d 791 (Okl.Cr.1982). … Garcia v. State, 545 P.2d 1295 (Okl.Cr.1976).

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Lane

184 Okla. 219 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1938

Swift & Co., 180 Okla. 252 , 68 P.2d 508 ; while it is the contention of the respondent that it comes within the rule of Fox v. Brown, 176 Okla. 201 , 55 P.2d 129 ; E. G. Fike Co. v. … Commission, 178 Okla. 375 , 62 P.2d 1027 , is contrary to the rule announced in Fox v. Brown. We do not so construe that authority.

Beck v. State

687 P.2d 1061 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 21, 1984

Renfro v. State, 607 P.2d 703 (Okl.Cr.1980); Sisk v. State, 483 P.2d 747 (Okl.Cr.1971). In the case at bar, defendant was observed exposing himself by Mr. Brown, and was caught “with his zipper down” when arrested. … See Cook v. State, 345 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1959); Marshall v. State, 316 P.2d 222 (Okl.Cr.1957); Bunn v. State, 85 Okl.Cr. 367 , 190 P.2d 464 (1943).

Clark v. Warner

85 Okla. 153 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1922

In Lawry v. Board of Com’rs of Snohomish Co. et al. … Board of County Commissioners of Payne County, 33 Okla. 353 , 125 Pac. 449 ; Black v. Geissler, 58 Okla. 335 , 159 Pac. 1124 , and Bodine v. McDaniel Auto Co., supra.

Ryan v. Humphries

50 Okla. 343 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 27, 1915

This seems to be, in substance, the doctrine laid down in Hill v. City of Indianapolis (C. C.), 92 Fed. 467 ; Daviess County v. Dickinson, 117 U. S. 657 , 6 Sup. Ct. 897, 29 L. Ed. 1026 ; Town of Bloomfield v. … In the first paragraph of the syllabus in Hill v.

School Dist. No. 85 v. School Dist. No. 71

135 Okla. 270 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1928

For the reason heretofore recited, this case is not comparable to Smartt v. Board of Com’rs of Craig County, 67 Okla. 144 , 169 Pac. 1161 . … In Levine v.

Bath v. Dumas

108 Okla. 260 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1925

Huddleston v. Board of Com’rs, 8 Okla. 614 , 58 Pac. 749 ; Shawnee v. Tecumseh, 52 Okla. 509 , 150 Pac. 890 ; Guthrie v. Stewart, 45 Okla. 603 , 146 Pac. 585 ; Close Bros. v. Okla. … See, also Whitson v. Board of Com’rs, 65 Okla. 273 , 166 Pac. 423 ; Champlin v. Carter, 78 Okla. 300 , 190 Pac. 679 .