Case law

Wisconsin Bankers Association v. Albert J. Robertson, Comprising the Federal Home Loan Bank Board

294 F.2d 714 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 1961

Loudon v. Taxing District, 1881, 104 U.S. 771, 774 , 26 L.Ed. 923 . … No deposits shall be accepted and no certificates of indebtedness shall be issued except for such borrowed money as may be authorized by regulations of the Board.” . Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v.

Nixon v. Quick

781 A.2d 754 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 2001

Stevens v. Quick, 678 A.2d 28, 31 (D.C.1996) (quoting Bennett v. Ridley, 633 A.2d 824, 826 (D.C.1993)). … Brown-Bey v. Hyman, 649 A.2d 8, 9 (D.C.1994).

Albrecht v. Committee on Employee Benefits of the Federal Reserve Employee Benefits System

357 F.3d 62 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 10, 2004

Cir. 2002) (de novo review of dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. … See, e.g., Woodbury v.

Money Station, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

94 F.3d 658 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 1996

United Transport Service Employees of America, Cio, Ex Rel. Washington v. National Mediation Board

179 F.2d 446 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 17, 1949

National Mediation Board, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 141 F.2d 366 (1944); United Transport Service Employees v. National Mediation Board, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 15 , 141 F.2d 724 (1944); National Federation v. … The craft or class determination of the Board was not the act of a state. Perry v.

Tommy Ho v. Merrick Garland

106 F.4th 47 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 2, 2024

Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976)); see Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). … Brown, 789 F.3d at 152 (citing Richardson v. United States, 193 F.3d 545, 548 (D.C. Cir. 1999)); see Abdelfattah v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 787 F.3d 524, 529 (D.C.

Juanita Kirkland v. District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation

70 F.3d 629 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 7, 1996

.”); Kuhn v. … In Rosden v.

Mallgren v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 2025

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668- 71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

United States ex rel. Dascomb v. Board of Tax Appeals of the United States

16 F.2d 337 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 6, 1926

Clair v. Conlon, 12 App. D. C. 161; Doyle v. District of Columbia, 45 App. D. C. 90; Texas P. R. Co. v. Murphy, 111 U. S. 488 , 4 S. Ct. 497 , 28 L. Ed. 492 ; Kingman v. Western Mfg. Co., 170 U. S. 675 , 18 S. … Com. v. Humboldt Steamship Co., 224 U. S. 474 , 32 S. Ct. 556 , 56 L. Ed. 849 ; Louisville Cement Co. v. Int. Com. Com., 246 U. S. 638 , 38 S. Ct. 408 , 62 L. Ed. 914 ; Kansas City Ry. v. Int. Com. Com., 252 U.

Price, John A. v. Bernanke, Ben

470 F.3d 384 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 2006

Wheatley, Associate General Counsel.  2 Before: GARLAND and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. … The district court granted the Board’s Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment, Price v. Greenspan, 374 F.

United Mine Workers of America Local Union 1329 v. National Labor Relations Board

812 F.2d 741 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1987

Union v. … The Board, however, did not attempt to conform its analysis to those cases. *744 For example, in International Union of Electrical Workers v.

Western Addition Community Organization v. National Labor Relations Board, the Emporium Capwell Company, Interventor

485 F.2d 917 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 29, 1973

FOR YEARS AT THE EMPORIUM BLACK, BROWN, YELLOW, AND RED PEOPLE, HAVE WORKED AT THE LOWEST JOBS, AT THE LOWEST LEVELS. … B. v. Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd., 349 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1965). 45 For these reasons the decision and order of the Board are reversed and remanded to the Board for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.

GEORGE WALKER, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OFFICER

127 A.3d 524 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 2015

District of Columbia v. Brown, 739 A.2d 832, 835 (D.C. 1999); see also 5 U.S.C. § 5596 (b)(1)(A)(i) (2012). … In fact, in Andress v. United States Postal Service, 56 MSPR 501 (1993), the Merit Systems Protection Board traced the FBPA’s mitigation requirement back to even before the FBPA itself.

Sheboygan County, a Municipal Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Manitowoc County, Intervenor

330 F.2d 232 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 12, 1964

It applied to the Civil Aeronautics Board for an order requiring scheduled air transportation to and from its airport, and made North Central a party to the proceeding. … The expert Board carefully spelled out the considerations which led to its conclusions. Its action has support in the record. Affirmed.

Charles Andrew Throckmorton v. National Transportation Safety Board, James Busey, Administrator Federal Aviation Administration

963 F.2d 441 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 5, 1992

C & W Fish Co. v. … Winslow v.

Picur v. Kerry

128 F. Supp. 3d 302 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 11, 2015

P. 56(a); see also Anderson v. … United States v. Clarke, 628 F.

In re Brandi S. Nave

180 A.3d 86 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 2018

United States, 756 A.2d 380, 389 (D.C. 2000)); see also Ingram v. … See, e.g., Pace v.

Williams v. Court Services & Offender Supervision Agency

772 F. Supp. 2d 186 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2011

Williams then petitioned the full MSPB board to reconsider the administrative judge’s decision. The full board denied his petition on June 20, 2008. (Id., Ex., Final Order at 1-2.) … Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 148 n. 1, 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984), and earlier version of the current Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(d)).

Chenault v. McHugh

968 F. Supp. 2d 268 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 2013

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 4 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … the decision on reconsideration, instead it runs from the date of the adverse review board decision”) (citing Bethke v.

In Re Uchendu

812 A.2d 933 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 2002

Similarly, the jurat of Agnes Straughn’s Certificate of Completion stated “I, Agnes V. … Pointing to the scienter requirements for criminal forgery, see United States v. Gilbert, 140 U.S.App.