Case law

Portland Canning Co. v. State Tax Commission

1 Or. Tax 600 · Oregon Tax Court · Jun 29, 1964

Compare, Londoner v. Denver, 210 US 373 (1908) with Bi-Metallic Invest. Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 239 US 441 (1915). … Strawn v.

Blackman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

60 Or. App. 446 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 1, 1982

We held in Schlecht v. SAIF, supra, that third-party distribution orders of the board under ORS 656.593 are reviewable by this court pursuant to ORS 656.298 as matters concerning a claim. See ORS 656.704. … In addition to the reasons stated in the text, we consider an outright reversal to be inappropriate here because the board and the parties did not have the benefit of our opinion in Schlecht v.

Burkholder v. State Accident Insurance Fund

11 Or. App. 334 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 1972

. * # * # In Norton v. … State Compensation Dept., 3 Or App 38 , 471 P2d 826 (1970), Hinkle v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 163 Or 395 , 97 P2d 725 (1940), overruled on other grounds, Dimitroff v. State Ind. Acc.

Aetna Casualty Co. v. Aschbacher

107 Or. App. 494 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 5, 1991

in Dethlefs v. … The Board relied on the court’s reasoning in Wright v. SAIF, 289 Or 323 , 613 P2d 755 (1980).

Coombs v. State Accident Insurance Fund

39 Or. App. 293 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 19, 1979

The timing of the claim closure does not determine whether it is on the Board’s own motion. See also Hinkle v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 2 163 Or 395 , 97 P2d 725 (1940). In Buell v. … See Colvin v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 197 Or 401 , 253 P2d 910 (1953); Buell v. S.I.A.C., supra.

Hopper v. SAIF Corp.

265 Or. App. 465 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 10, 2014

Everett v. SAIF, 179 Or App 112, 118-19 , 38 P3d 952 , rev den, 334 Or 76 (2002) (quoting Mullenaux v. Dept. of Revenue, 293 Or 536, 541 , 651 P2d 724 (1982)). … See OAR 438-011-0015(1) (“Review by the board is de novo upon the entire record.”); Grinstead v.

Shevtsov v. Dept. of Rev.

Oregon Tax Court · Feb 5, 2024

See Budget Rent-A-Car v. … See Multnomah Kennel Club v.

Brom v. Newell

15 Or. App. 246 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 5, 1973

Anderson v. Alexander, 191 Or 409 , 229 P2d 633 , 230 P2d 770 (1951); Thompson v. Cupp, 5 Or App 393 , 484 P2d 858 , 29 ALR2d 1051 (1971); State ex rel Gilmore v. … Ball v. Gladden, 250 Or 485 , 443 P2d 621 (1968).

Farmers Insurance Co. v. Aranda

279 Or. App. 36 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 2016

Moreover, we reject employer’s argument that the board’s explanation was inadequate. We acknowledge that in Schoch v. … Crawford v. SAIF, 241 Or App 470 , 476 n 4, 250 P3d 965 (2011) (citing SAIF v. Allen, 320 Or 192, 211-12 , 881 P2d 773 (1994).

Heller v. Ebb Auto Co.

308 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 16, 1989

See, e.g., Dennis v. Employment Div., 302 Or 160 , 728 P2d 12 (1986); Hyde v. Employment Division, 302 Or 171 , 728 P2d 19 (1986). … Similarly, although the Board may decide the merits of a compensation claim anew on the referee’s record, see OAR 472- 10-020(l)(b) and (c); Dennis v.

SAIF v. Kelkay

336 Or. App. 444 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 27, 2024

The board observed that, although SAIF’s argu- ment was consistent with an older line of board orders, our decision in Guill v. M. … Applying that framework, the board concluded that the 450 SAIF v.

Baker v. Commercial Body Builders, Inc.

264 Or. 614 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1973

Plaintiffs’ contentions—Browning v. C & C Plywood Gorp. … Plaintiffs also say that in Browning v.

United States v. Collins

877 F. Supp. 516 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 27, 1995

In Bartkus v. … United States v. Koon, 34 F.3d 1416, 1438 (9th Cir.1994) (citing United States v. Guy, 903 F.2d 1240, 1242 (9th Cir. 1990)).

State v. Kapsalis/Scroggins

123 Or. App. 138 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 1993

In State v. … BMW and that defendant Kapsalis drove a brown BMW.

Morrow County v. Hendryx

14 Or. 397 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1887

The same doctrine is maintained in Canova et al. v. Comm’rs of Bradford Co., *402 18 Fla. 512 ; Trinity Co. v. Polk Co., 58 Tex. 321 ; Pulaski County v. Judge of Saline Co., 37 Ark. 339 ; Supervisors of Chickasaw Co. v. … Supervisors of Sumner Co., 58 Miss. 619 ; Eagle v. Beard,, 33 Ark. 497 ; State v. McFadden, 23 Minn. 40 ; Askew v. Hale Co., 54 Ala. 639 ; Comm'rs of Currituck Co. v. Comm’rs of Dare Co., 79 N.

Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19

300 Or. 507 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1986

“In Megdal v. … Problems of interest representation on public agencies are discussed in Megdal, v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293, 307 , 605 P2d 273 (1980), and in City of Roseburg v.

SAIF Corp. v. Dubose

335 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 2003

In Mabon v. … In Norton v.

Baker v. STEELE

229 Or. 498 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1961

The board had jurisdiction to make the determination, and Baker failed to demonstrate wherein the pro *501 ceedings were irregular. Bechtold et al. v. Wilson et al., 182 Or 360 , 186 P2d 525 , 187 P2d 675 . … Bechtold et al. v. Wilson et al., supra. The city charter admittedly gives the civil service board jurisdiction to decide disputes concerning seniority.

City of Portland v. Price

106 Or. App. 455 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 3, 1991

Brown saw defendant walk into the restaurant wearing a shoulder holster with a firearm in plain view. Brown called for uniformed officers to investigate, and two Portland Police Officers responded. … See State v.

Alexander v. Gower

200 Or. App. 22 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 1, 2005

See Barber v. Gladden, 210 Or 46, 62-63 , 309 P2d 192 (1957), cert den, 359 US 948 (1959); see also Billings v. … White v.