Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

2.79s

  • State v. Planters Gin Co.

    175 Okla. 386 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1935

    In Standard Paving Co. v. … State v. Cushing Gro. Co., 135 Okla. 186 , 274 P. 876 ; R. C. Jones Cotton Co. v. State, 139 Okla. 212 , 282 P. 622 ; State v. Thompson-Parker Lbr. Co., 173 Okla. 22 , 46 P. (2d) 494 ; State v. Rorabaugh-Brown D. G.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Quinton Belief Oil & Gas Co. v. Corporation Commission

    101 Okla. 164 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 19, 1924

    Board of Equalization v. First State Bank, 77 Okla. 291 , 188 Pac. 115 . … Brown v. Miller et al., 89 Okla. 287 , 215 Pac. 748 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Overton v. State

    95 Okla. Crim. 127 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1952

    Brown were all in his automobile the night the collision occurred with Harper’s car. The defendant, Hoskins and Mrs. Overton were riding in the front seat and Brown in the back seat. … Lincoln v. State, 86 Okla. Cr. 415 , 193 P. 2d 618 . Complaint is made of the testimony of Officer Rankin wherein he swore that Mrs. Overton stated that Mr. Overton was driving the automobile of Overton.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Morrison v. Roberts

    183 Okla. 359 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1938

    Ann. see. 1451; Witt v. Wentz, 142 Okla. 128 , 286 P. 796 ; Bath v. Dumas, 108 Okla. 260 , 236 P 1 ; State ex rel. Shepard, Treas., v. Crouch, 31 Okla. 206 , 120 P. 915 ; Payne, County *362 Treas., v. … Thomas v. Brenner, 171 Okla. 320 , 42 P.2d 823 .

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • In Re Ambler

    11 Okla. Crim. 449 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1914

    Co. v. Byrne, 119 Tenn. 278 , 104 S. W. 460 ; Joy et al. v. City of Terrell (Tex.) 138 S. W. 213 ; State v. Price, 229 Mo. 670 , 129 S. W. 650 . In State ex rel. v. Wiethaupt. 231 Mo. 449 , 133 S. … State v. Blair, 60 N. W. 486 .

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. King v. White

    170 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 1934

    Friend v. Cummings, 47 Okla. 44 , 147 P. 161 . No attention was paid to this act of the Legislature by this school district or school board at that time. … Co. v. Haynes, Co. Tr., 8 Okla. 576 , 58 P. 738 ; Union Sav. Ass’n v. Burns, 74 Okla. 1 , 176 P. 227 ; and Hollis v. Adams Gin Co., 115 Okla. 25 , 241 P. 744 ).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Phillips v. Williams

    583 P.2d 488 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1978

    United States Board of Parole, 167 U.S.App.D.C. 268 , 511 F.2d 1270 (1974); Cook v. Whiteside, 505 F.2d 32 (5th Cir. 1974); Mower v. Britton, 504 F.2d 396 (10th Cir. 1974); United States ex rel. Johnson v. … Monks v. State Board of Parole, 58 N. J. 238, 277 A.2d 193, 196 (1971).

    Vacated by Williams v. Phillips, 442 U.S. 926 (1979)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Matter of Adoption of Michelle N.

    577 P.2d 68 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1978

    In Mann v. … See, Wade v. Brown, Okl., 516 P.2d 526 (1973). When such fundamental rights are at issue, the standard of proof must be at least clear and convincing proof. See: Alsager v. District Court of Polk Cty., Iowa, 406 F.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Lane

    184 Okla. 219 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1938

    Swift & Co., 180 Okla. 252 , 68 P.2d 508 ; while it is the contention of the respondent that it comes within the rule of Fox v. Brown, 176 Okla. 201 , 55 P.2d 129 ; E. G. Fike Co. v. … Commission, 178 Okla. 375 , 62 P.2d 1027 , is contrary to the rule announced in Fox v. Brown. We do not so construe that authority.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sebring v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

    401 P.2d 479 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1963

    See Barnett v. Kennedy, 185 Okl. 409 , 92 P.2d 963 ; and Tulsa Building & Loan Ass’n v. Leonard, 188 Okl. 562 , 112 P.2d 363 . … Brown v. Eastman National Bank of Newkirk, Okl., 291 P.2d 828 , 55 A.L.R.2d 971 . Therefore this is a matter where the bank has breached its obligation to pay money only.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Speight v. Presley

    203 P.3d 173 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 10, 2008

    North Side State Bank v. Board of County Commission ers of Tulsa County, 1994 OK 34 , 894 P.2d 1046, 1051 . 114 The district court clerk is both a county officer and an officer or "arm" of the court. Petuskey v. … North Side State Bank v. Board of County Commuission- *179 ers of Tulsa County, 1994 OK 34 , 894 P.2d 1046, 1051 .

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. State

    36 Okla. Crim. 436 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 1927

    While this officer was on the running board, Stevenson unscrewed the top of the fruit jar, kicked it over, and the whisky ran over a sweater, and at the police station the Officer Gray squeezed a small quan-. tity out of … Cr. 519 , 103 P. 538 ; Sturgis v. State, 2 Okla. Cr. 326 , 190 P. 57 : Brown v. State, 4 Okla. Cr. 13 , 115 P. 603 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. CLARK

    2023 OK 27 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 2023

    OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. … Bar Ass'n v. Kinsey , 2009 OK 31 212 P.3d 1186 Id . ¶ 16, 212 P.3d at 1192 (citing State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass'n v. Doris , 1999 OK 94 991 P.2d 1015 Id . Background Count I: Brown Grievance ¶12 Dennis Brown, Sr.'

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Short v. State

    634 P.2d 755 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1981

    Bryne v. State, 620 P.2d 1328 (Okl.Cr.1980); Laughton v. State, 558 P.2d 1171 (Okl.Cr.1977). The ruling relied on in City of Tulsa v. … Brown, from which mortal wounds the same Vicki Marie Brown did languish and die on the 6th day of August, 1978.”

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Ervin v. State

    580 P.2d 1002 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 1978

    Officer Chester Brown identified the exhibit as the same gun which he picked up at the scene and placed in a police unit. … In Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 518 P.2d 898 (1974), wherein the defendant complained of the chain of custody of a hydraulic jack, we stated: . .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bradford v. State

    3 Okla. Crim. 367 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1910

    Gardenhire v. Burdick, 7 Okla. 212, 54 Pac. 483 . In Brown v. … In Board of Commissioners of Day County v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Simington v. Parker

    250 P.3d 351 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 2011

    Vasek v. Board of County Commissioners of Noble County, 2008 OK 35 , 1 14, 186 P.3d 928, 932 . … City of Tulsa, 1986 OK 44, ¶ 5 , 721 P.2d 803, 805 ; Girdner v. Board of Commissioners of Cherokee County, 2009 OK CIV APP 94, ¶ 19 , 227 P.3d 1111 (man-date issued November 19, 2009).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • MUSTANG RUN WIND PROJECT, LLC v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENT

    2016 OK 113 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 1, 2016

    MUSTANG RUN WIND PROJECT, LLC, Plaintiff/Appellee v. OSAGE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Defendant/Appellant, v. THE OSAGE NATION, Counter-Appellant. … Board of Adjustment , 2002 OK 80, ¶ 11 , 63 P.3d 1, 5 . 32 Sinclair Oil & Gas Co. v. Bishop , 1967 OK 167 , 441 P.2d 436, 447-448 ; Robbins v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Rogers v. Lassiter, Adm'r.

    196 Okla. 228 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 1945

    Fairly illustrative of this line of authorities are the cases of Brown v. Durham, 175 Okla. 500 , 53 P. 2d 551 , and Crawford, County Treasurer, et al. v. McConnell et al., 173 Okla. 520 , 49 P. 2d 551 . … into with Brown.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • James v. Rogers

    734 P.2d 1298 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1987

    Although assuming, without deciding, the Board’s authorization of the amendment was quasi-judicial in character, Meyer v. … See State v. Haden, 349 Mo. 982 , 163 S.W.2d 946 (1942); State v. Meier, 115 N.W.2d 574 (N.D.1962); State v. Bogart, 73 Ohio App. 47 . 53 N.E.2d 75 (1943); In re Welsh, 458 Pa. 645 , 327 A.2d 6 (Pa.1974); Clegg v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.