Case law

Nero v. Chastang

358 So. 2d 740 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Mar 8, 1978

BROWN and MACK M. CHASTANG, and ordering the unpaid balance of said monies paid into Court. "2. Ordering the plaintiff, SAMUEL V. NERO, and the defendants, THOMAS H. BROWN and MACK M. … Brown, and Mr.

Coosa Valley Bank v. Taylor-Holmes Indus. Supply, Inc.

420 So. 2d 51 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 24, 1982

Jim Short Ford Sales, Inc. v. Washington , 384 So.2d 83 , 86 (Ala. 1980). See, also, First Virginia Bankshares v. Benson , 559 F.2d 1307 (5th Cir. 1977); Hall Motor Co. v. … Furman , 285 Ala. 499 , 234 So.2d 37 (1970); Collier v. Brown , 285 Ala. 40 , 228 So.2d 800 (1969).

Groover v. Watson

224 Ala. 559 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 14, 1932

Board of Revenue v. Huey, 195 Ala. 83 , 70 So. 744 . … J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

City of Birmingham v. Birmingham Business College, Inc.

256 Ala. 551 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 14, 1951

County Board of Education, 235 Ala. 388 , 179 So. 197 ; Board of Education of Jefferson County v. State Tax Comm., 237 Ala. 434 , 187 So. 414 . … J., and BROWN, LAWSON, SIMPSON and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Singer v. City of Alabaster

821 So. 2d 954 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 9, 2001

BROWN, Justice. ■ Brenda 0. Singer, Patsy H. Cannon, Gwen Dill, and John D. … In Clark v.

Lumpkin v. State

171 So. 3d 599 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 19, 2014

In Neuman v. … See Bryan v. Brown, 339 So.2d 577, 579 (Ala. 1976) (“Rule 7, however, pertains only to costs on appeal, and the failure to give security for costs is not fatal to appellate jurisdiction.”).

Rice v. Tuscaloosa County

242 Ala. 62 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 30, 1941

City of Mobile v. Board of R. & R. … It is a sufficient answer to appellant’s contention that his claim did not accrue until the decision in Houston County Board of Revenue v.

Loreno v. Ross

222 Ala. 567 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 12, 1931

BROWN, J. This is an action by the plaintiff against the defendant for wrongfully causing tbs *570 death of plaintiff’s minor son, a boy about seventeen years of age. Code 1923, § 5695. … L. 52, § 48; 40 Cyc. 872; Bahel v. Manning, 112 Mich. 24 , 70 N. W. 327 , 36 L. R. A. 523, 67 Am. St. Rep. 381 ; Judd v. Ballard, 66 Vt. 668 , 30 A. 96 ; Hankins v. Watkins, 77 Hun, 360 , 28 N. Y. S. 867; Manning v.

Knight Iron & Metal Co. v. Ardis

240 Ala. 305 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 10, 1940

And Holmes testified that he got the pistol from the place indicated by the General Manager, and took it with him as he drove out with the laborers on board. … All the Justices except BROWN, J., concur in the conclusion that the writ should be awarded, and their several views are stated above. BROWN, J., dissents.

Jewel Tea Co. v. Sklivis

231 Ala. 590 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 16, 1936

Plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that the driver, nevertheless, permitted the child to ride on the running board. … Co. v. Wright, 207 Ala. 411 , 92 So. 654 ; St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Robbins, 219 Ala. 627 , 123 So. 12 ; Perry Supply Co. v. Brown, 221 Ala. 290 , 128 So. 227 ; Alabama Produce Co. et al. v.

Green v. Drug Enforcement Agency

502 F. Supp. 2d 1220 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Aug 17, 2007

In Valderrama v. … Id.; United States v. Eubanks, 169 F.3d 672 (11th Cir.1999).

City of Birmingham v. JEFFERSON COUNTY BD.

468 So. 2d 181 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Mar 20, 1985

Although we agree with the Board that the City has improperly filed an appeal, we nevertheless choose in this instance to treat the City's appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari to this court. See, e.g., Murphy v. … *Page 185 Burroughs Corp. v. Hall Affiliates, Inc. , 423 So.2d 1348 (Ala. 1982).

CadleRock III, LLC v. Harry Brown & Co., LLC

District Court, M.D. Alabama · May 13, 2020

Brown, as personal representative of the Estate of Harry I. Brown, Sr. (“Estate”). Doc. 308. … Schock v. FDIC, 118 F. Supp. 2d 165, 169-70 (D. R.I. 2000), aff’d on other grounds, Schock v. United States, 254 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2001)); see also Commer Law Corp., PC v. FDIC, 2016 U.S. Dist.

Lett v. Dennis

221 Ala. 432 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 31, 1930

L. 273; Ex parte Jackson, 212 Ala. 496 , 103 So. 558 ; State v. Board, 180 Ala. 489 , 61 So. 368 . … J., and BROWN and FOSTER, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., concurs in result. SAYRE and BOULDIN, JJ., not sitting.

Young v. City of Tuscumbia

217 Ala. 683 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 7, 1928

Co. v. W. U. Tel. Co., 195 Ala. 124 , 71 So. 118 , Ann. Cas. 1917B, 696. … J., and SOMERVILLE and BROWN, JJ., concur.

ALA. GREAT SOUTHERN R. CO. v. Sumter Plywood Corp.

359 So. 2d 1140 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 21, 1978

See Baker v. Wheeler, Lacy Brown, Inc. , 272 Ala. 101 , 128 So.2d 721 (1961) [lease, tenant]; Republic Steel Corp. v. … See Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. Demonville , 167 Ala. 292 , 52 So. 406 (1910), and McKinney v. Mobile O.R. Co. , 215 Ala. 101 , 109 So. 752 (1926).

Fulford v. BD. OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF DOTHAN.

256 Ala. 336 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 18, 1951

“Wagon Wheel” appealed to the circuit court, where the ruling of the Board was affirmed, and now brings this appeal from that judgment. … Kensington Realty Holding Corp. v. Jersey City, 118 N.J.L. 114, 115 , 191 A. 787, 788 ; Burmore Co. v. Smith, 124 N.J.L. 541 , 12 A.2d 353, 356 ; Lane v.

Ex Parte Board of School Com'rs of Mobile County

230 Ala. 304 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 25, 1935

Holtville High School Bldg., 226 Ala. 45 , 145 So. 491 ; Greeson v. County Board of Education, 221 Ala. 483 , 129 So. 42 ; Greeson Mfg. Co. v. County Board of Education, 217 Ala. 565 , 117 So. 163 ; Kimmons v. … Jefferson County Board of Education, 204 Ala. 384 , 85 So. 774 . In Turk v.

Parker v. State

687 So. 2d 1279 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Nov 22, 1996

After a prison disciplinary hearing, the appellant was found guilty of the charge by a prison disciplinary board. … Ex parte Brown, 592 So.2d 621, 623 (Ala.1991). In Young v.

Alabama State Personnel Bd. v. Hardeman

893 So. 2d 1173 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Apr 16, 2004

In Hilyer v. … However, we must apply the proper standard of review and afford a presumption of correctness in favor of the Personnel Board's findings and not the ALJ's findings. In Personnel Board of Alabama v.