Case law

Petition of Youngblood

895 S.W.2d 322 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1995

Belmont v. Board of Law Examiners, 511 S.W.2d 461, 462 (Tenn.1974). See also, Petition of Tenn. … See MARTA v. Metro.

Wofford v. Hooper

149 Tenn. 250 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1923

In Jones v. Eubanks, 86 Ga., 619 , 12 S. … In the case of Kollock v.

State of Tennessee v. Kristina Cole and Montez Mullins

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 5, 2018

State v. Brown, 915 S.W.2d 3, 7 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995). “The mere presence of a person in an area where drugs are discovered is not, alone, sufficient to support a finding that the person possessed the drugs.” State v. … State v. Banks, 271 S.W.3d 90, 116 (Tenn. 2008).

State v. Thompson

193 Tenn. 395 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1952

E. 610; Meglemery v. Weissinger, 140 Ky. 353 , 131 S. W. 40 , 31 L. R. A., N. S., 575; Gaw v. Ashley, 195 Mass. 173 , 80 N. E. 790 ; Board of Commissioners v. Montgomery, 170 Ga. 361 , 153 S. E. 34, 37 ; Arbogast v. … Compare Tisdale v. Tisdale, 34 Tenn. 596 .

Ray v. Trapp

609 S.W.2d 508 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1980

The case of Ezell v. … In Massengill v.

State of Tennessee v. Jimmy Dale Qualls

482 S.W.3d 1 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 28, 2016

(quoting State v. Brown, 823 S.W.2d 576, 583 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991) [hereinafter Brown I] (internal quotation marks omitted))). … State v. Brown, 992 S.W.2d 389, 391 (Tenn. 1999) [hereinafter Brown III] (citing Tidwell, 922 S.W.2d at 500-01; Burlison v. State, 501 S.W.2d 801, 803 (Tenn. 1973)).

Troutman v. Crippen

186 Tenn. 459 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 10, 1937

administrative powers upon said board. … -the-board.

Bell v. Bowers Stores, Inc.

3 Tenn. App. 590 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 31, 1926

However exacting the duty or high degree of care to furnish pure foods, beverages, and medicines, we believe that Judge Cooley, as expressed in Brown v. … The case of Brown v.

David Mathews v. The City of Chattanooga, Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 15, 2010

Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997); Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Cent. S., 816 S.W.2d 741, 744 (Tenn. 1991). … v. Moriarity, 135 Tenn. 446, 186 S.W. 1053 (Tenn. 1916); Barron v. City of Memphis, 113 Tenn. 89, 80 S.W. 832 (Tenn. 1904).

State of Tennessee v. Frankie E. Casteel

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 24, 2004

State v. Bush, 942 S.W.2d 489, 501 (Tenn. 1997) (citing State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530, 539 (Tenn. 1992)). The identity of the perpetrator is an essential element of any crime. See State v. … Memphis Publishing Co. v. Tennessee Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board, 975 S.W.2d 303, 306 (Tenn. 1998) (citations omitted).

Donna Denton v. John Hahn

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 16, 2004

Burnett, 108 Tenn. 173, 184, 65 S.W. 408, 411 (1901); City of Memphis v. Wait, 102 Tenn. 274, 277, 52 S.W.161, 162 (1899); Brown v. Brown, 45 Tenn. App. 78, 95-96, 320 S.W.2d 721, 728 (1958). … Brown v. Wal-Mart Discount Cities, 12 S.W.3d 785, 789 (Tenn. 2000).

Grigsby v. City of Plainview

194 S.W.3d 408 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 6, 2005

We think the Board’s order or judgment was entered on December 20, 1996. The applicant relies on the case of Carter v. … In this case we think the record before the Board conclusively shows that the Board’s action was entered on the record on December 20,1996. Advanced Sales, Inc., at 1-2. See also Gore v.

Raymond Andrew Herbst v. State of Tennessee

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 30, 2015

Smith v. State, 357 S.W.3d 322, 355 (Tenn. 2011) (quoting Harris v. State, 301 S.W.3d 141, 145 (Tenn. 2010)). In Ward v. … See, e.g., Brown v. State, 928 S.W.2d 453, 455-57 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996); Passarella v. State, 891 S.W.2d 619, 625-26 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994); see also Darien C. Houston v. State, No.

State of Tennessee v. Jamie Roskom

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 9, 2007

State v. Hammonds, 30 S.W.3d 294, 299 (Tenn. 2000) (citing State v. Hill, 954 S.W.2d 725, 727 (Tenn. 1997)). … State v.

Davison v. Carr

659 S.W.2d 361 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1983

Fairhaven Corporation v. Tennessee Health Facilities Commission, 566 S.W.2d 885, 886 (Tenn.App.1976). T.C.A. § 6-20-220, under which Mrs. … Watts v. Civil Service Board of Columbia, 606 S.W.2d 274, 276-7 (Tenn.1980). See also Cantrell, Review of Administrative Decisions by Writ of Certiorari in Tennessee, 4 Memphis St.L. Rev. 19 (1973).

Dorrier v. Dark

537 S.W.2d 888 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1976

Appellant relies upon Keyishian v. Board of Regents of U. of St. of N. … See Witt v. McCanless, 200 Tenn. 360 , 292 S.W.2d 392 (1956). Raton Public Service Company v.

Crowe v. Carter County

195 Tenn. 659 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1953

Our conclusion thus expressed is supported by the following cases: Putnam County Beer Board v. Speck, 184 Tenn. 616 , 201 S. W. (2d) 991 ; State ex rel. Thurman v. Scott, 184 Tenn. 76 , 195 S. W. (2d) 617 ; Anderson v. … Putnam County Beer Board, 184 Tenn. 623 , 201 S. W. (2d) 994 ; Sowell v. Red, 192 Tenn. 681 , 241 S. W. (2d) 775 ; and Bragg v. Boyd, 193 Tenn. 507 , 246 S. W. (2d) 575 , and Young v. Boyd, 193 Tenn. 507 , 246 S.

Lyons v. Rasar

872 S.W.2d 895 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1994

State v. Sliger, 846 S.W.2d 262, 263 (Tenn.1993). In seeking to ascertain legislative intent, we must look to the entire statute in order to avoid any forced or subtle construction of the pertinent language. McClain v. … Belle-Aire Village, Inc. v. Ghorley, 574 S.W.2d 723, 725 (Tenn.1978); Spence v. Miles Laboratories, Inc., 810 F.Supp. 952 (E.D.Tenn.1992).

American Mut. Liability Ins. v. Garth

174 Tenn. 297 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1939

Counsel for defendants cite and rely on Code, section 6-861, and the holdings of this Court in Brown v. Birmingham Nurseries, 173 Tenn., 343 , 117 S. W. (2d), 739 ; Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. … Not only does willful connote intentional, purposeful violation of orders, as said in Brown v. Birmingham Nurseries, supra, but also an element of perverseness.

First State Bank v. Stacey

37 Tenn. App. 223 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 12, 1952

McDonnell v. Amo, 162 Tenn. 36 , 34 S. W. (2d) 212 ; Brown v. Brown & Co., 25 Tenn. App. 509 , 160 S. W. (2d) 431 ; Henderson v. Watson, 25 Tenn. App. 506 , 160 S. W. (2d) 429 ; Hamilton Nat’l Bank v. … McDonnell v. Amo, supra; Brown v. Brown & Co., supra. Appellant further insists that he was not required to register his claim within the ninety day period as fixed by the Chancellor.