Case law

Meyer v. Lord

37 Or. App. 59 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 6, 1978

In 1000 Friends v. … Rutherford v.

County of Linn v. State of Oregon

319 Or. App. 288 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 27, 2022

See Moro v. … James v. State of Oregon, 308 County of Linn v.

State v. McKat

15 Or. App. 180 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 29, 1973

State v. Fogle, 254 Or 268, 270-75 , 459 P2d 873 (1969). … See State v. Woodward, 1 Or App 338 , 462 P2d 685 (1969). Eeversed and remanded. ORS 41.360 (15). ORS 41.360 (14). ORS 43.330 (5); 43.370.

Barrett v. Belleque

344 Or. 91 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 7, 2008

The court relied upon Penrod/Brown v. … Penrod /Brown, 283 Or at 28 .

Tektronix Corp. v. Twist

62 Or. App. 602 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 13, 1983

On January 26, 1982, the Board reversed the referee and remanded the claim to the carrier for acceptance. On February 5, 1982, employer petitioned the Board for reconsideration. … See Bowman v. Oregon Transfer Co., 33 Or App 241 , 576 P2d 27 (1978).

State v. Smith

277 Or. App. 709 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 20, 2016

Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). Defendant further asserts that an exercise of our discretion under Ailes v. … Brown, 310 Or at 355 .

Miller v. SAIF Corp.

78 Or. App. 158 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 1986

See Harwell v. Argonaut Insurance Co., 296 Or 505, 510 , 678 P2d 1202 (1984); Walker v. Compensation Department, 248 Or 195, 196 , 432 P2d 1018 (1967); McElmurry v. … Neely v. SAIF, 43 Or App 319, 323 , 602 P2d 1101 , rev den 288 Or 493 (1979); Cf. R.A. Gray & Co. v.

Corporation of the Sisters of Mercy v. Lane County

123 Or. 144 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1927

BROWN, J. Section 4235, Or. … Francis v. Board of Review, 231 Ill. 317 ( 83 N. E. 272 ), St. Joseph’s Hospital Assn. v. Ashland County, 96 Wis. 636 ( 72 N. W. 43 ), and State v. Powers, 10 Mo. App. 263 ( 74 Mo. 476 ).

Garbutt v. SAIF Corp.

297 Or. 148 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 22, 1984

In Oakley v. … The cases cited in Oakley, Larson v. Compensation Dept., 251 Or 478 , 445 P2d 486 (1968), and Collins v.

Blackman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

60 Or. App. 446 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 1, 1982

We held in Schlecht v. SAIF, supra, that third-party distribution orders of the board under ORS 656.593 are reviewable by this court pursuant to ORS 656.298 as matters concerning a claim. See ORS 656.704. … In addition to the reasons stated in the text, we consider an outright reversal to be inappropriate here because the board and the parties did not have the benefit of our opinion in Schlecht v.

Dillon v. Whirlpool Corp.

172 Or. App. 484 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 21, 2001

In 1987, the legislature amended ORS 656.298 to eliminate de novo review of Board decisions. Or Laws 1987, ch 884, § 12a; see Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp., 309 Or 292, 295 , 787 P2d 884 (1990). … On review, we will affirm the Board’s findings so long as substantial evidence supports them. Winters v. Woodburn Carcraft Co., 142 Or App 182, 187 , 920 P2d 1118 (1996); Queener v.

Baker v. Commercial Body Builders, Inc.

264 Or. 614 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1973

Plaintiffs’ contentions—Browning v. C & C Plywood Gorp. … Plaintiffs also say that in Browning v.

State Ex Rel. Swan v. Kozer

115 Or. 638 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1925

BROWN, J. The Secretary of State can be required to act only in compliance with an existing law. … Board, 34 Kan. 606 ( 9 Pac. 765 ); State ex rel. v. Sims, 18 S. C. 460).” That excerpt is quoted in Andrews v. Neil, 61 Or. 471 ( 120 Pac. 383 , 123 Pac. 32 ).

Portland Canning Co. v. State Tax Commission

1 Or. Tax 600 · Oregon Tax Court · Jun 29, 1964

Compare, Londoner v. Denver, 210 US 373 (1908) with Bi-Metallic Invest. Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 239 US 441 (1915). … Strawn v.

White v. Holman

44 Or. 180 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1904

In Butchers’ Union Co. v. Crescent City, 111 U. S. 746 (4 Sup. … Thus in Plumb v. Christie, 103 Ga. 686 ( 30 S. E. 759 , 42 L. R.

SAIF Corp. v. Drews

318 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1993

SAIF argued that the Board misinterpreted the 1990 amendments. The Court of Appeals agreed with the Board’s analysis and affirmed its order. SAIF v. Drews, supra. … Bracke v. Baza’r, 293 Or 239, 244 , 646 P2d 1330 (1982). See Runft v. SAIF, 303 Or 493, 499-500 , 739 P2d 12 (1987) (recognizing that “last injurious exposure” rule may produce arbitrary results); Boise Cascade Corp. v.

State v. Althof

273 Or. App. 342 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 26, 2015

State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). … Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), and State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285 , 899 P2d 663 (1995). Marrington, 335 Or at 557, 560, 564.

State v. Roeder

209 Or. App. 199 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 8, 2006

That criterion is derived from Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 (1977). … The court imported those factors from Brown v. Multnomah County Dist.

Early v. Employment Department

274 Or. App. 321 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 14, 2015

“We review the [board’s] order for substantial evidence and errors of law, and to determine whether its analysis comports with substantial reason.” Campbell v. … See PUC v.

Court v. State Accident Insurance Fund

25 Or. App. 691 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 14, 1976

The request for further hearings and appeals could act only as a rejection by claimant and trigger the medical board of review process. Billings v. Crouse, supra; Ware v. SAIF, 7 Or App 571 , 492 P2d 484 (1972). … Their orders are therefore reversed and the case remanded to the Workmen’s Compensation Board for appointment of a medical board of review pursuant to former ORS 656.810.” Billings v.