Case law

Shook v. Conover Woodworking, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 24, 1997

Brown are ruled upon in accordance with the applicable provisions of the law and the Opinion and Award in this case. … On September 28, 1994, plaintiff lifted an oak board weighing approximately twenty-five pounds and felt a sudden burning in her low back.

McLean v. Harnett Cty. B.O.E.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Dec 17, 2004

What amount is plaintiff Barbara Mae McLean entitled to recover of the defendant Harnett County Board of Education? … Bolkir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 365 S.E.2d 989 (1988). 2.

Trivette v. Yount

217 N.C. App. 477 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 20, 2011

Brown v. Motor Inns of Carolina, Inc., 47 N.C. App. 115, 118 , 266 S.E.2d 848, 849 (1980). … We note it is well established that both a principal and the teachers under the principal’s supervision are considered employees of the local school board. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 115 -325C et seq. (2009); Taylor v.

Childress v. Yadkin County

186 N.C. App. 30 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 2007

Burcham, Delmer Simmons, Ronald Childress, Kenneth Vestal, and Paul Brown (“plaintiffs”) appeal the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Jerry Bryant (“Bryant”) and Yadkin County (“the County”). 1 This case … When a zoning board is acting in a quasi-judicial capacity, however, it is required to make findings of fact. See Devaney v. City of Burlington, 143 N.C.

Sandy Mush Properties, Inc. v. Rutherford County Ex Rel. Rutherford County Board of Commissioners

187 N.C. App. 809 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2007

Sandy Mush Props., Inc. v. Rutherford Cty., 361 N.C. 569 , 651 S.E.2d 566 (2007). … In Robins , our Supreme Court held that “when the applicable rules and ordinances are not followed by a town board, the applicant is entitled to have his application reviewed under the ordinances and procedural rules in effect

State v. Tarantino

86 N.C. App. 441 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 1987

See Texas v. Brown, supra, and United States v. Lee, 274 U.S. 559 , 71 L.Ed. 1202 , 47 S.Ct. 746 (1927). There are, however, important factual differences between Dunn and the present case. … The front of Dunn’s barn was “essentially open”; Tarantino had boarded all of his windows and doors.

Glenn v. . Commissioners of Durham

201 N.C. 233 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1931

R. v. Lenoir County , 200 N.C. 494 ; R. R. v. Cherokee County , 195 N.C. 756 ; R. R. v. Forbes , 188 N.C. 151 ; R. R. v. McArtan , 185 N.C. 201 ; Parvin v. Commissioners , 177 N.C. 508 ; Pritchard v. … Commissioners , 178 N.C. 449 ), or "for the purpose of taking up a note in bank made by the predecessor board and other current expenses" ( R. R. v.

Chastain v. Arndt

253 N.C. App. 8 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 2017

Meyer v. Walls, 347 N.C. 97, 110, 489 S.E.2d 880, 887 (1997) (citing Anita R. Brown-Graham & Jeffrey S. Koeze, Immunity from Personal Liability under State Law for Public Officials and Employees: An Update, Loc. … V. Conclusion When sued in his official capacity, Defendant is entitled to the same sovereign immunity as Gaston College and its Board of Trustees.

Sanderlin v. . Luken

152 N.C. 738 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 30, 1910

Adams v. Joyner , 147 N.C. 77 ; Porter v. Armstrong , 139 N.C. 179 ; Pool v. Trexler , 76 N.C. 297 ; Norfleet v. Cromwell , 70 N.C. 634 ; Fall Brook v. Bradley , 164 U.S. 112 ; Warts v. … *Page 712 Cited: White v. Lane , 153 N.C. 17 ; Forehand v. Taylor , 155 N.C. 355 ; Trustees v. Webb, ib , 386; Carter v. Comrs. , 156 N.C. 187 ; Comrs. v.

Robins v. Town of Hillsborough

176 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 21, 2006

V. … Browning-Ferris Industries v. Guilford County Bd. of Adj., 126 N.C.App. 168, 171 , 484 S.E.2d 411, 414 (1997).

In Re the Will of Beale

202 N.C. 618 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 20, 1932

Beale boarded at his house about three months, with her little girl. “She .was there at *621 my bouse about two Aveeks I tbink before sbe died. … Grove v. Spiker, 72 Md., 300 .’ 18 A. and E. Anno. Cases, 412.” In re Mueller’s Will, 170 N. C., at pp. 29-30. In re Stephens, 189 N. C., 267 . Manly, J., in Wright v. Howe, 52 N.

Smith v. Keator

21 N.C. App. 102 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1974

Willner v. Committee on Character & Fitness, 373 U.S. 96, 102-03 (1963) ; Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 238-39 (1957) ; Goldsmith v. … Co. v.- Corporation Comm’n, 286 U.S. 210, 234 (1932) ; accord, State v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431 , 194 S.E. 2d 19 : Jackson v. Board of Adjustment, 275 N.C. 155 , 166 S.E. 2d 78 .

Lewis v. . Commissioners of Wake

74 N.C. 194 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

judgment, or on the complaint of some private individual; though cases do occur where an offence is presented by the grand jury, without preliminary notice, against an absent party,.“ a mode of proceeding,” however, says Brown

Stern v. . Benbow

151 N.C. 460 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1909

Sherrill v. Hagan , 92 N.C. 349 ; McGee v. Craven , 106 N.C. 356 ; Currie v. Hawkins , 118 N.C. 595 ; Quinn v. Sexton , 125 N.C. 452 ; Brown v. Hobbs , 147 N.C. 77 . … Mitchell v. Brown , 88 N.C. 156 ; Bank v. Alexander , 84 N.C. 30 ; Morrison v. Watson , 95 N.C. 479 ; Turrentine v. R. R. , 92 N.C. 638 ; Porter v. R. R. , 97 N.C. 66 ; Allen v. Sallinger , 105 N.C. 333 ; Puffer v.

Tong v. Dunn

2012 NCBC 16 · North Carolina Business Court · Mar 19, 2012

Tong v. Dunn, 2012 NCBC 16. … V.

Rouse v. Strickland

260 N.C. 491 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1963

Davis v. Brown, 241 N.C. 116, 118 , 84 S.E. 2d 334 , and cases cited; Franklin v. Faulkner, 248 N.C. 656, 659 , 104 S.E. 2d 841 . The title to all lands of which J. T. … Griffin v. Springer, 244 N.C. 95, 98 , 92 S.E. 2d 682 , and oases cited; Cannon v. Baker, 252 N.C. 111, 113 , 113 S.E. 2d 44 ; Lackey v. Board of Education, 258 N.C. 460, 462 , 128 S.E. 2d 806 .

Graham v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

174 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 12, 1917

Brown, J. … Ibid., Southern Ry. v. Hobbs, 63 L. R. A., 68; Anderson v. R. R., 161 N. C., 462 ; Clark v. Traction Co., 138 N. C., 82 .

Coleman v. Wake County Board of Education

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 8, 2019

Wake County Board of Education, et al Defendant. … See, e.g., BlackRock Eng’rs, Inc. v. Duke Energy Progress, LLC, No. 7:15-CV- 250-D, 2018 WL 4409377, at *4 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 17, 2018) (moving party provided copies of emails between the parties); Davenport v.

Sanco of Wilmington Service Corp. v. New Hanover County

166 N.C. App. 471 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 21, 2004

“If a petitioner contends the Board’s decision was based on an error of law, de novo review is proper.” Westminster Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary Zoning Bd. of Adjust., 140 N.C. … See Guilford Financial Services, LLC v. The City of Brevard, 150 N.C.

In Re the Appeal of General Tire, Inc.

102 N.C. App. 38 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1991

. § 150B-51 (1987); Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E.2d 538 (1977). … In re Browning, 51 N.C. App. 161 , 275 S.E.2d 520 (1981) (appeal from decision of the Employment Security Commission); Fisher v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours, 54 N.C.