Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersWV

5,304 results

0.89s

  • The West Virginia State Police, Department of Military Affairs v. J.H., a Minor, by and through His Parent and Next Friend, L.D.

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Mar 26, 2021

    it violated a clearly established law or right in performing its discretionary functions. … Next, we must move forward in the qualified immunity analysis and determine whether J.H. has alleged that the acts of the Trooper Defendants were in violation of clearly established statutory or constitutional rights or

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The West Virginia State Police, Department of Military Affairs v. J.H., a Minor, by and through His Parent and Next Friend, L.D.

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Mar 26, 2021

    it violated a clearly established law or right in performing its discretionary functions. … Next, we must move forward in the qualified immunity analysis and determine whether J.H. has alleged that the acts of the Trooper Defendants were in violation of clearly established statutory or constitutional rights or

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • W. Va. Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority v. A.B.

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Mar 27, 2014

    [the West Virginia Governmental Tort Claims and Insurance Reform Act], is entitled to qualified immunity from personal liability for official acts if the involved conduct did not violate clearly established laws of which … Code, 29-12A-1, et seq. is entitled to qualified immunity from personal liability for official acts if the involved conduct did not violate clearly established laws of which a reasonable

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • J.H. v. West Virginia Division of Rehabilitation Services

    224 W. Va. 147 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jul 27, 2009

    Va.Code, 29-12A-1, et seq., 11 is entitled to qualified immunity from personal liability for official acts if the involved conduct did not violate clearly established laws of which a reasonable official would have known. … Unless the plaintiff’s allegations state a claim of violation of clearly established law, a defendant pleading immunity is entitled to dismissal before the commencement of discovery.”

    Abrogated by West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority v. A.B., 234 W. Va. 492 (2014)Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Jackie L. Brown, II v. City of Montgomery

    233 W. Va. 119 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Feb 20, 2014

    Code, 29-12A-1, et seq., is entitled to qualified immunity from personal liability for official acts if the involved conduct did not violate clearly established laws of which a reasonable official would have known. … Code, 29-12A-1, et seq., is entitled to qualified immunity from personal liability for official acts if the involved conduct did not violate clearly established laws of which a reasonable

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • George Nicholas Parsons v. Wiley Tyler Raines and Calhoun County Commission

    Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia · May 28, 2025

    Generally stated, qualified immunity shields a government official performing discretionary functions from liability for civil damages when the official’s conduct does not violate “clearly established statutory or constitutional … Like the circuit court, we see no facts in the petitioner’s complaint demonstrating how the deputy violated a clearly established constitutional right.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • West Virginia Department of Health, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, and Allen R. Mock, M.D. v. Dr. Patsy Cipoletti, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of June Cipoletti

    West Virginia Supreme Court · May 21, 2024

    whether qualified immunity applies on a “case-by-case basis.” 7 We recently summarized our qualified immunity jurisprudence as follows: Qualified immunity is an immunity from suit afforded … Va. 573, 587, 10 Respondent relies on the MPLA as the basis for his position that he has alleged the violation of a “clearly established statutory right” to defeat Petitioners’ claim to qualified immunity

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • B.R. v. West Virginia DHHR

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Oct 13, 2020

    In affirming the circuit court’s decision, this Court found that pleading simple negligence, without a violation of a clearly established right, is insufficient to overcome qualified immunity. … I. reveals that this Court reviewed the pleadings and found that “[p]leading simple negligence, without a violation of a clearly established right, is insufficient to overcome qualified immunity.” B.R.I., at *2. In B.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eric Burke v. Wetzel County Commission

    815 S.E.2d 520 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jun 6, 2018

    Lemley is entitled to qualified immunity because he acted in his official capacity and did not violate any clearly established law of which a reasonable official would have known. … Lemley did not violate any clearly established laws of which a reasonable official would have known. Mr.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. West Virginia Department of Health & Human Resources v. Kaufman

    203 W. Va. 56 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1998

    from suit based upon (1) statutory immunity; (2) quasi-judicial immunity; (3) common-law doctrine of qualified immunity and no violation of a clearly established right; and (4) absence of duty based upon the public duty … ; (3) common-law doctrine of qualified immunity and no violation of a clearly established right; and (4) absence of duty based upon the public duty doctrine.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • David Taylor v. George M. Hill

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 21, 2014

    established law. … Whether respondent had qualified immunity from petitioner’s action The doctrine of qualified immunity affords “immunity to the State and its [public] officer for discretionary acts negligently committed within the

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Edward S., Administrator of the Estates of T.S. and A.K., Edward S. and Rachel K., Individually and as Next Friends of J.K. v. Raleigh County Housing Authority

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Jun 8, 2023

    So, RCHA argued, it was immune from Edward S.’s negligence claims because he had not established that any alleged failing in its inspection process violated clearly established statutory or constitutional rights or laws of … to violations of clearly established rights or laws.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pethtel v. West Virginia State Police

    568 F. Supp. 2d 658 · District Court, N.D. West Virginia · Jul 29, 2008

    Qualified immunity is abrogated only upon a showing that the officer’s conduct violated a constitutional right and that such right was clearly established at the time the conduct occurred. Id. … Furthermore, even if the plaintiff had established a constitutional injury, the supervisors are entitled to qualified immunity because, as discussed above, such injury was not clearly established at the time. E.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • WV Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority v. The Estate of COdy Lawrence Grove

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 20, 2020

    that he engaged in any act or omission related to the suicide of the Estate’s decedent that established the violation of a clearly established right. … 17 This Court has established numerous steps that must be examined in order to find whether qualified immunity protections apply in a particular case.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Better Government Bureau, Inc. v. McGraw

    904 F. Supp. 540 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Oct 16, 1995

    This is so because there is no requirement that the ‘exact right allegedly violated’ be previously ‘specifically recognized by a court’ in order for it [to] be held ‘ “clearly established” for qualified immunity purposes. … established” for qualified immunity purposes, but is also perhaps one of the more well-settled principles of constitutional jurisprudence.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • West Virginia of Corrections v. Tracy Jividen

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Apr 10, 2015

    The WVDOC argues that the circuit court’s reason for denying summary judgment on the defense of qualified immunity is clearly erroneous and is flawed in several major respects. … “[T]he doctrine of qualified or official immunity bars a claim of mere negligence against a State agency . . . and WVDOC’s argument that qualified immunity shields the WVDOC from the Plaintiff’s claim should

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The Mercer County Board of Education and Dr. Deborah Akers v. Amanda Shrewsbury

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 12, 2024

    The respondent further argued that even if the circuit court decided that qualified immunity applied, it was abrogated by the petitioners’ violation of clearly established rights. … “It is well established that claims for both constitutional and common law qualified immunity are available only for the State, its agencies, officials, and/or employees.” Kent, 249 W.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State of West Virginia ex rel. Gabriel Devono and The Board of Education of Randloph County v. The Honorable David H. Wilmoth, Judge of the Circuit Court of Randolph Coutny, Sherman Arbogast, and Marlene Arbogast

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Jun 15, 2023

    Devono now assert the defense of qualified immunity? … Hall, 828 F.3d 298, 303 (4th Cir. 2016) (“Qualified immunity shields government officials from personal liability when their conduct does not violate clearly established rights of which a reasonable person would have known

    Cited 0 timesSeparate
  • WV Division of Corrections, Scott Patterson and Jason Walton v. P.R.

    West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 22, 2019

    The parties disagree about whether Policy Directive 332.02 constitutes a “clearly established law” for purposes of defeating qualified immunity. … whether or not a right is clearly established, has resulted in the “conver[sion of] qualified immunity to near absolute immunity,” Rebalancing Harlow: A New Approach to Qualified Immunity in the Fourth Amendment, 68 Chase

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gilmore v. Bostic

    659 F. Supp. 2d 755 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Sep 22, 2009

    in a prison’s sex offender treatment program is not clearly established. … immunity from personal liability for official acts if the involved conduct did not violate clearly established laws of which a reasonable official would have known.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.