Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersTN

10,000+ results

3.19s

  • Kelly v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry.

    75 F. Supp. 737 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 15, 1948

    Therefore, the action of the Adjustment Board is not merely advisory. Elgin, J. & E. R. Co. v. Burley, 325 U.S. 711 , 65 S.Ct. 1282 , 89 L.Ed. 1886 . … Switchmen’s Union of North America et al. v. National Mediation Board et al., 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 ; General Committee, etc., v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Holmes v. Jarrett Moon & Co.

    54 Tenn. 506 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1872

    Moreau v. Saffarans, 3 Sneed, 599 . … Ward v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Heather Carey v. Margaret R. Johnson

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 23, 2003

    See Brown v. Null, 863 S.W.2d 425, 429 (Tenn.Ct.App. 1993). … Industrial Development Board of Tullahoma v. Hancock, 901 S.W.2d 382, 385 (Tenn.Ct.App.1995); see also Jackson v. Aldridge, 6 S.W.3d 501, 504 (Tenn.Ct.App.1999). Tenn.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Christopher K. Knight

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 27, 2003

    State v. Smith, 871 S.W.2d 667, 672 (Tenn. 1994). The reviewing court should not overturn that decision absent an abuse of discretion. State v. Brown, 53 S.W.3d 264, 284 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). … State v. Brown, 795 S.W.2d 689, 696 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1990). In the instant case, the defendant’s argument is based on speculation that the potential juror’s statements prejudiced the jury against the defendant.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cooper

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 8, 2026

    BROWN, Plaintiffs, v. … See, e.g., DePonceau v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Waldauer v. Britton

    172 Tenn. 649 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1938

    By chapter 237, Private Acts 1911, the administration of the affairs of Shelby county were transferred from the county court to a new board of commissioners. This court, in Prescott v. … There is no such provision in the Constitution with reference to state officers, and members of the State Board of Elections are state officers. State ex rel. v. Bratton, 148 Tenn., 174 , 253 S. W., 705 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Supreme Lodge K. of P. v. LaMalta

    95 Tenn. 157 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1895

    Bacon’s Benefit Societies and Life Insurance, §§ 161, 185; Tennessee Lodge v. Ladd, 5 Lea, 720 , 721; Catholic Knights v. Kuhn, 91 Tenn., 216 . … Commandery v. Ainsworth, 71 Ala., 436 .

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Bob Fannon v. City of Lafollette

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 11, 2010

    Browning Ferris Ind. v. City of Oak Ridge, 644 S.W.2d 400, 402 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1982). … State v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 18 S.W.3d 186, 194 (Tenn. 2000); see also Taylor v. Fezell, 158 S.W.3d 352, 359 (Tenn. 2005).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Davis v. Evans

    122 Tenn. 184 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1909

    Rep., 195 ; Scholle v. State, 90 Md., 729 , 46 Atl., 326 , 50 L. R. A., 411, 414; State v. Thompson, 160 Mo., 333 , 60 S. W., 1077 , 54 L. R. A., 950, 952-953, 83 Am. St. Rep., 468 ; Hurst v. … W., 189 ; Staggs v. State, 3 Humph., 372 ).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Railroad v. Harris

    99 Tenn. 684 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1897

    Law, Sec. 28; Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat., 436 ; State v. Yardley, 95 Tenn., 560 ; Cole Mfg. Co. v. Falls, 90 Tenn., 469 ; Ellis v. State, 92 Tenn., 93 ; Railroads v. Crider, 91 Tenn., 507 . … S., 141 ; McCall v. California, 136 U. S., 104 ; Leisy v. Hardin, 135 U. S., 108 ; Leloup v. Mobile, 127 U. S., 645 ; Gibbons v . Ogden, 9 Wheat., 1 ; Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat., 419 ; Welton v. Missouri, 91 U.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • Steven Tyler Nabi v. State of Tennessee

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 30, 2019

    Vaughn v. State, 202 S.W.3d 106, 115 (Tenn. 2006) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted); see Felts v. State, 354 S.W.3d 266, 276 (Tenn. 2011); Frazier v. … Lane v. State, 316 S.W.3d 555, 562 (Tenn. 2010); Grindstaff v. State, 297 S.W.3d 208, 216 (Tenn. 2009); Hicks v. State, 983 S.W.2d 240, 245 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1998).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Petition of Youngblood

    895 S.W.2d 322 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1995

    Belmont v. Board of Law Examiners, 511 S.W.2d 461, 462 (Tenn.1974). See also, Petition of Tenn. … See MARTA v. Metro.

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Wofford v. Hooper

    149 Tenn. 250 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1923

    In Jones v. Eubanks, 86 Ga., 619 , 12 S. … In the case of Kollock v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Kristina Cole and Montez Mullins

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 5, 2018

    State v. Brown, 915 S.W.2d 3, 7 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995). “The mere presence of a person in an area where drugs are discovered is not, alone, sufficient to support a finding that the person possessed the drugs.” State v. … State v. Banks, 271 S.W.3d 90, 116 (Tenn. 2008).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Thompson

    193 Tenn. 395 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1952

    E. 610; Meglemery v. Weissinger, 140 Ky. 353 , 131 S. W. 40 , 31 L. R. A., N. S., 575; Gaw v. Ashley, 195 Mass. 173 , 80 N. E. 790 ; Board of Commissioners v. Montgomery, 170 Ga. 361 , 153 S. E. 34, 37 ; Arbogast v. … Compare Tisdale v. Tisdale, 34 Tenn. 596 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Blair v. State ex rel. Watts

    555 S.W.2d 709 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1977

    Atkin v. … Campbell v. Board of Civil Service Com’rs of City of Los Angeles, 76 Cal.App.2d 399 , 173 P.2d 58 .” 315 S.W.2d at 116 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Troutman v. Crippen

    186 Tenn. 459 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 10, 1937

    administrative powers upon said board. … -the-board.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Jack Scott v. Tennessee Department of Transportation

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 25, 2024

    City of Memphis v. Civ. Serv. Comm’n, 216 S.W.3d 311, 317 (Tenn. 2007) (quoting Jackson Mobilphone Co. v. Tenn. Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 876 S.W.2d 106, 111 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1993)). IV. … Therefore, we affirm the Board’s decision. V. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we reverse the trial court’s February 23, 2023 order.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Jamie Roskom

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 9, 2007

    State v. Hammonds, 30 S.W.3d 294, 299 (Tenn. 2000) (citing State v. Hill, 954 S.W.2d 725, 727 (Tenn. 1997)). … State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Frankie E. Casteel

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 24, 2004

    State v. Bush, 942 S.W.2d 489, 501 (Tenn. 1997) (citing State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530, 539 (Tenn. 1992)). The identity of the perpetrator is an essential element of any crime. See State v. … Memphis Publishing Co. v. Tennessee Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board, 975 S.W.2d 303, 306 (Tenn. 1998) (citations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.