Case law

Borough of Roseland v. Essex County Board

18 N.J. Misc. 613 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 22, 1940

See, for example, Borough of Kenilworth v. Board of Equalization (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1909), 78 N. J. L. 439; 74 Atl. … Mickle v. Matlack (Supreme Court, 1839), 17 N. J. L. 86; Smith v. Minor (Supreme Court, 1790), 1 Id. 16; Waldron v. Rowe (Supreme Court, 1917), 91 Id. 71; 106 Atl. Rep. 212 .

Estelle v. Board of Education of Borough of Red Bank

14 N.J. 256 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 11, 1954

It is, of course, axiomatic that jurisdiction cannot be bestowed by consent or acquiescence, Hofmann v. Jinks, 134 N. J. Eq. 91, 96 *261 (E. & A. 1943); Brown v. Allied Plumbing and Heating Co., 130 N. J. … L. 150 (E. & A. 1936); Air-Way Branches Inc. v. Board of Review, 10 N. J. 609, 614 (1952).

City of Newark v. Essex County Board of Taxation

124 N.J. Super. 76 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 17, 1973

Newark’s cross-appeal repeats its challenge to the Board’s use of the state equalization ratio and reasserts its claim that none of the V. A. and E. H. … Our Supreme Court has specifically held that a county board may adopt the ratios promulgated by the Director of Taxation. Passaic v. Passaic County Bd. of Taxation, supra; Greenwich Tp. v.

Finn v. Municipal Council of Clifton

136 N.J.L. 34 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 10, 1947

R. 766; Brown v. Terhune, 125 N. J. L. 618. … Brown v. Terhune, supra; Jersey Triangle Corp. v. Board of Adjustment, 127 N. J. L. 194. The ordinance under attack in Section 1 prohibits gasoline service stations in residential districts.

Plainfield-Union Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

6 N.J. Misc. 267 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 3, 1928

A claim for interest on the amortization of the difference in rates was asked by the prosecutor and disallowed by the board. We think this disallowance is supported by the case of Indiana Bell Telephone Co. v. … This question has been considered and disposed of in the case of Middlesex Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners of New Jersey, 6 N. J. Mis.

Atlantic & Suburban Railway Co. v. State Board of Assessors

80 N.J.L. 83 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 26, 1910

Commonwealth v. Wilkinson, 16 Pick. 175 ; Pickard v. Howe, 53 Mass. 198 ; Peoples T. and T. Co. v. Berks and D. T. Road, 199 Pa. St. 411. … Trustees v. Hoboken, 4 Vroom 13 ; De Groot v. Jersey City, 36 Id. 121; Pease v. Traction Company, 40 Id. 165, and cases there cited.

Ringwood Board of Education v. K.H.J. ex rel. K.F.J.

469 F. Supp. 2d 267 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 13, 2006

On November 21, 2005, this Court issued an Opinion and Order granting Ring-wood Board of Education’s (“Plaintiff’) motion for summary judgment and denying Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. … Id. at 864, citing W.B. v. Matula, 67 F.3d 484, 500 (3d Cir.1995).

In Re Lalama

343 N.J. Super. 560 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 10, 2001

Id. at 393-94 , 625 A. 2d 1085 (quoting State v. Brown, 99 N.J.Super. 22, 28 , 238 A. 2d 482 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 51 N.J. 468 , 242 A. 2d 16 (1968)). … See Brown, supra, 99 N.J.Super. at 28 , 238 A. 2d 482 ; see also Middlesex County Dept. of Health v. Importico, 315 N.J.Super. 397, 423-25 , 718 A. 2d 727 (Law Div.1998).

Sherman v. Federal Security Agency, Social Security Board

70 F. Supp. 758 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 30, 1947

and the case to the Social Security Board for further proceedings. … The government cites Giresi v. Giresi, 1945, 137 N.J.Eq. 336, 44 A.2d 345 ; Reik v. Reik, 1932, 109 N.J.Eq. 615, 158 A. 519 ; Hollingshead v. Hollingshead, 1920, 91 N. J.Eq. 261, 110 A. 19 ; Greenspan v.

College of Paterson v. State Board of Tax Appeals

131 N.J.L. 57 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 14, 1943

The State Board of Tax Appeals denied prosecutor’s claim and affirmed the action of the County *58 Board of Tax Appeals. To review this last action, a writ of certiorari was allowed. … City of Trenton v. State *59 Board of Tax Appeals, 127 N. J. L. 105; affirmed, sub nom. Trenton v. Rider College, 128 Id. 320. We find that prosecutor has failed to sustain the burden of proving its right to exemption.

American Dream at Marlboro, LLC v. Planning Board of Marlboro

231 N.J. 202 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 16, 2017

Harper v. National Labor Relations Board

807 F. Supp. 359 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 19, 1992

In Leedom v. … Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. at 109 , 97 S.Ct. at 986 , citing Weinberger v.

Oxford Board of Trade v. Oxford Iron & Steel Co.

81 N.J.L. 694 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1911

For the purpose, doubtless, of encouraging the locating of manufacturing interests at Oxford, the board of trade of that municipality conveyed the locus in quo to the grantee by a deed of conveyance in fee, with a condition … Southard v. Central Railroad, 2 Dutcher 20; McKelway v. Seymour, 5 Id. 328.

American Malt Corp. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

86 N.J.L. 668 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 16, 1914

We do not, however, wish to be understood that had we differed from the Supreme Court and reached the conclusion that the board of public utility commissioners had not exercised a sound but an arbitrary and unreasonable discretion … in disapproving of the merger of these corporations, that our decision would be different. .The question, whether or not the Supreme Court has the power to review and reverse the determination of such board in the matter

State ex rel. Cleveland v. Board of Finance & Taxation

38 N.J.L. 259 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1876

Walter v. Union, 4 Vroom 350 ; State v. City of Newark, 3 Dutcher 185 ; State, Ruckman, v. Demarest, 3 Vroom 528 ; Campbell v. City of Kenosha, 5 Wall. 194 ; City v. Lamson, 9 Ib. 477 ; Cooley’s Const. Lim. 371, &c. … Hawes, 37 Barb. 440 ; Plimpton v.

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Board of Commissioners

122 N.J.L. 47 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 4, 1939

Heetner v. Newark, 12 N. J. Mis. R. 560. See, also, Siciliano v. Township of Neptune, 83 N. J. L. 158; Nutley v. Brandt, 12 N. J. Mis. R. 670. … Kolb v. Boonton, 64 N. J. L. 163; Van Der Vliet v. Newark, 112 Id. 39.

Borough of Oradell v. State Board of Tax Appeals

126 N.J.L. 112 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1941

North Bergen v. State Board, 2 N. J. Mis. R. 258; affirmed, 101 N. J. L. 235. The statutory prerequisite being duly complied with in this case, we are of the opinion that the correction prayed for should be made. … The appellant argues that North Bergen v. State Board, supra, is not in point because in that case there was an appeal pending before the State Board which is not the situation with the case at bar.

Doe v. Hopewell Valley Regional School District Board of Education

231 N.J. 299 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 26, 2017

Saxenmeyer v. State Board of Registration

79 N.J.L. 427 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 13, 1910

State v. Knowles, 90 Md. 646 . … the state board of examiners, and that no examination was made of the relator by that board as to his qualifications to practice dentistry, for the affidavit of the secretary of the Pennsylvania board of examiners is that

Doe v. Hopewell Valley Regional School District Board of Education

231 N.J. 309 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 26, 2017