Case law

International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

502 F.2d 349 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 25, 1974

Hall v. Cole, supra, at 4-5 . … Dallas General Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local Union No. 745 v. NLRB, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 100 , 500 F.2d 768 (1974); West Texas Utilities Co. v.

Green v. Geren

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2011

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Frizelle v. Slater, 111 F.3d 172, 176 (D.C. Cir. 1997). The correction board’s decision need only “minimally contain ‘a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.’” Dickson v.

Greer v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 2024

See Brown v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. 1 Cir. 2015). … See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). III.

Atlantic Veal & Lamb, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

156 F. App'x 330 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 2005

unless ... those determinations are ‘hopelessly incredible,’ ‘self-contradictory,’ or ‘patently unsupportable.’ ” Cadbury Beverages, Inc. v. … NLRB, 160 F.3d 24, 28 (D.C.Cir.1998) (quoting Capital Cleaning Contractors, Inc. v. NLRB, 147 F.3d 999, 1004 (D.C.Cir.1998)).

Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board (State of Rhode Island, Intervenor)

178 F.2d 726 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 30, 1949

scope of the proceeding is plainly within the Board’s discretion. … As the Board points out, “The large number of applications filed with the Board and the fact that they are invariably over-lapping, both as to the areas to be served and the type of services to be performed, necessitates

United States v. Royal

902 F. Supp. 268 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 24, 1995

U.S. v. Perkins, 963 F.2d at 1527. … United States v. Chatman, 986 F.2d at 1452 .

Bethel v. Jefferson

589 F.2d 631 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 9, 1978

Love v. Pullman Co., 404 U.S. 522, 527 , 92 S.Ct. 616, 619 , 30 L.Ed.2d 679, 685 (1972); Bell v. Brown, 181 U.S.App.D.C. 226, 230 , 557 F.2d 849, 853 (1977); Coles v. … See Bell v. Brown, supra note 54 , 181 U.S.App.D.C. at 230 , 557 F.2d at 853 . . Coles v. Penny, supra note 54 , 174 U.S.App.D.C. at 284 , 531 F.2d at 616 . . Love v.

Division 700, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. National Railway Labor Arbitration Board No. 282

224 F. Supp. 366 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 11, 1963

The Act in question creates an Arbitration Board to consist of seven mem *368 bers. In Section 3 it defines the function of this Board. … The Court also overrules the objection of counsel for the Board to the effect that the Board and its members are not proper parties.

Hessey v. Burden

615 A.2d 562 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 1992

Cramer v. Brown, 7 Ohio St.3d 5, 6 , 454 N.E.2d 1321, 1322 (1983) (citations omitted); see also Diaz v. Board of County Commissioners, 502 F.Supp. 190, 193-194 (S.D.Fla.1980); State ex rel. Williams v. … Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky, 217 U.S. 563, 573 , 30 S.Ct. 578, 579 , 54 L.Ed. 883 (1910); accord, e.g., Nordlinger v. Hahn, — U.S. -, -, 112 S.Ct. 2326, 2332 , 120 L.Ed.2d 1 (1992). Mr.

N.Y.C. Apparel F.Z.E. v. U.S. Customs & Border Protection Bureau

618 F. Supp. 2d 75 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 27, 2009

Equally unpersuasive is the distinction drawn in Judicial Watch between the statutory provision at issue in that case (and here) and the statutory provisions at issue in Brown v. … Brown, 78 F.3d at 652 .

Teamsters Union Local 557 v. National Labor Relations Board

91 F. App'x 157 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 30, 2004

See NLRB v. Denver Building Trades Council, 341 U.S. 675, 687-90 , 71 S.Ct. 943 , 95 L.Ed. 1284 (1951). … See District 29, United Mine Workers of Am. v. NLRB, 977 F.2d 1470, 1471 (D.C.Cir.1992). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

Arthur L. Morgan Union, Local No. 3 v. National Labor Relations Board

463 F.2d 818 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 1972

Cedar Rapids Block Company v. N.L.R.B., 332 F.2d 880 at 885 (8th Cir., 1964). . The agreement at the time it was introduced in evidence at the hearing had the date (Sept. 19, 1969) filled in. … Bro. of Boilermakers, etc. v. N.L.R.B., 109 U.S.App.D.C. 382 , 288 F.2d 166 , cert. denied, 368 U.S. 832 , 82 S.Ct. 55 , 7 L.Ed.2d 34 (1961).

Washington Railway & Electric Co. v. Kramer

44 App. D.C. 154b · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 29, 1915

Co. v. Snashall, 3 App. D. C. 420; Harbison v. Metropolitan R. Co. 9 App. D. C. 60, 9 Am. Neg. Cas. 168 ; Brown v. Washington & G. R. Co. 11 App. D. C. 37; Brightwood R. Co. v. Carter, 12 App. D. … V. R. Co. v. Chapman, 26 App. D. C. 472, 6 Ann. Cas. 721; Capital Traction Co. v. Brown, 29 App. D. C. 473, 12 L.R.A. (N.S.) 831.

Commonwealth of Virginia v. United States

386 F. Supp. 1319 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 27, 1975

Second, even after Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), Virginia’s compliance with desegregation was grudging at best. See, e. g. Bradley v. … School Board of City of Newport News et al., 61 F.Supp. 395 (E.D.Va.1945); Freeman et al. v. County School Board, et al., 82 F.Supp. 167 (E.D.Va.1948) aff’d 171 F.2d 702 (4th Cir. 1948); School Board of Warren County v.

Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 of International Union of Operating Engineers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Northern California Chapter, the Associated General Contractors of America, Inc., and Central California Chapter, the Associated General Contractors of America, Inc., St. Maurice, Helmkamp, and Musser, a California Partnership v. National Labor Relations Board

266 F.2d 905 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 8, 1959

266 F.2d 905 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL UNION NO. 3 OF INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … This is an area of interpretation into which we should follow the Board. N.L.R.B. v. Hearst Publications, Inc., 322 U.S. 111, 128-129 , 64 S.Ct. 851 , 88 L.Ed. 1170 ; N.L.R.B. v.

Mount Jezreel Christians Without a Home v. Board of Trustees of Mount Jezreel Baptist Church

582 A.2d 237 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 1990

Williams, et al. v. Board of Trustees of Mount Jezreel Baptist Church, Civil Action No. 12510-82. … Mount Jezreel Baptist Church Board of Trustees v. Thompson, No. 86-846, decided May 17, 1988 (unpublished).

Woodward & Lothrop, Inc. v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board and John L. Harris

392 F.2d 479 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 11, 1968

See D.C.Code §, 46-309 (1967), supra note 2; AEM, Inc. v. Ecke, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 240 , 271 F.2d 506 (1959). See additionally, e. g., Cramer v. … Appeals Board, 321 Mich. 178 , 32 N.W.2d 434 (1948); Ashford v. Appeals Board, 328 Mich. 428 , 43 N.W.2d 918 (1950); Shannon v. Bureau of Unemployment Compensation, 155 Ohio 53 , 97 N.E.2d 425 (1951); Jacobs v.

Munoz v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 10, 2010

(Order, Munoz v. Board of Trustees, No. 09-7028 (D.C. Cir., Jan. 22, 2010) [dkt. #26].) … South Dakota Board of Regents, 796 F.2d 1060, 1062 (8th Cir.1986); see also Ward v. Kennard, 200 F.R.D. 137, 139 (D.D.C. 2001) (discussing cases).

Durr v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2021

Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (cleaned up). More, the Court must assess a pro se complaint “in light of all filings, including filings responsive to a motion to dismiss.” Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. … That provision allows judicial review of decisions by a “selection board” only when that board’s recommendation has first been considered by a “special board.”

Friedling v. Freedman

44 App. D.C. 191 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 29, 1915

Griffin v. Nitcher, 57 Me. 270 ; Brown v. Long, 36 N. C. (1 Ired. Eq.) 190 , 36 Am. Dec. 43 ; Board of Public Works v. Columbia College, 17 Wall. 521 , 21 L. ed. 687. … Scott v. Neely, 140 U. S. 106 , 35 L. ed. 358, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 712; Cates v. Allen, 149 U. S. 451 , 37 L. ed. 804, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 883, 977.