Case law

Miller v. SAIF Corp.

78 Or. App. 158 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 1986

See Harwell v. Argonaut Insurance Co., 296 Or 505, 510 , 678 P2d 1202 (1984); Walker v. Compensation Department, 248 Or 195, 196 , 432 P2d 1018 (1967); McElmurry v. … Neely v. SAIF, 43 Or App 319, 323 , 602 P2d 1101 , rev den 288 Or 493 (1979); Cf. R.A. Gray & Co. v.

Netherton v. Aerotek Inc.-Allegis Grp. Inc. (In re Netherton)

292 Or. App. 550 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 2018

. *551 Claimant petitions for review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board. … We conclude that this case is controlled by our prior decisions in McDermott v. SAIF , 286 Or. App. 406 , 398 P.3d 964 (2017), and Magana-Marquez v. SAIF , 276 Or. App. 32 , 366 P.3d 764 (2016), and affirm.

Zollinger v. Warner

286 Or. 19 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1979

In Willamette Valley Lumber Co. v. … Sanborn, J., in United States v. Ness, 230 F 950, 953 (8th Cir 1916), as quoted in School Dist. No. 1, Mult. Co. v. Nilson, 262 Or 559, 567 , 499 P2d 1309 (1972). The circuit court had jurisdiction to be wrong.

Walter v. Scherzinger

339 Or. 408 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 13, 2005

Walter v. Scherzinger, 193 Or App 355 , 89 P3d 1265 (2004). … Com., 107 Or 314, 330 , 215 P 586 (1923) (quoting Scales v.

Wasco County v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Local No. 2752

30 Or. App. 863 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 6, 1977

Assn. v. Sch. … Brusco Towboat v. State Land Bd., 30 Or App 509 , — P2d — (1977); Bienz v. City of Dayton, 29 Or App 761 , 566 P2d 904 (1977); Smith v. Peet, 29 Or App 625 , 564 P2d 1083 , 30 Or App 245 , 567 P2d 125 (1977); McCrae v.

Bailey v. Morrison-Knudsen Company

5 Or. App. 592 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 17, 1971

As we pointed out in Swanson v. … Martin v. Douglas Co. Lumber, 4 Or App 69, 71-72 , 476 P2d 940 (1970); Melius v. Boise Cascade Corp., 2 Or App 206 , 466 P2d 624 (1970); Moore v. U. S. Plywood Corp., 1 Or App 343 , 462 P2d 453 (1969).

Simi v. LTI Inc. - Lynden Inc.

301 Or. App. 535 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2019

See Simi v. … The board cited our opinion in Akins v.

Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Hayes

325 Or. 592 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1997

Andrews v. … Clark v. U.S.

Compensation of Jones v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

49 Or. App. 543 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 1, 1980

Hammond v. Albina Engine & Mach., 13 Or App 156 , 509 P2d 56 (1973); Hiles v. Compensation Department, 2 Or App 506, 470 P2d 165 (1970); Barr v. Compensation Department, 1 Or App 432 , 463 P2d 871 (1970). In Hiles v. … "We have previously held that Board orders remanding a case to the hearing officer are not final appealable orders.” Buster v. Chase Bag Co., 14 Or App 323, 331 , 513 P2d 504 (1973), citing Hammond v.

Hicks v. SAIF Corp.

194 Or. App. 655 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 25, 2004

As we said in Khrul v. Foremans Cleaners, 194 Or App 125 , 93 P3d 820 (2004), in reviewing the director’s order on reconsideration, the board is not free to determine a claimant’s impairment. … (“Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, only the attending physician at the time of closure may make findings regarding the worker’s impairment for the purpose of evaluating the worker’s disability.”); Koitzsch v.

Rogers v. Corvel Enterprise Comp, Inc.

318 Or. App. 641 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 30, 2022

The board adopted the ALJ’s findings. There cannot be a plausible contention that claimant was not exposed to Influenza A at work. Employer contends that our opinion incorrectly relied on Mize v. … See, e.g., Staffing Servs., Inc. v.

Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. v. Lamb

278 Or. App. 622 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 2, 2016

See Schoch v. … We note, however, that in SAIF v.

Larson v. Heintz Construction Co.

219 Or. 25 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1959

Lovett v. … S. v.

Kelley v. Park View Apartments

215 Or. 198 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1958

Brown.” Mr. Brown is the husband of the defendant-appellant Myrtle Brown. Neither Cook’s apartment nor the Browns’ faces on 18th. … Ure v. United States, 93 F Supp 779 ; Brown, Adm’x. v. Gessler, 191 Or 503 , 230 P2d 541 , and Bedell et ux. v.

SAIF Corp. v. Tull

113 Or. App. 449 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 10, 1992

The Board found that the record did not indicate when claimant was given notice of SAIF’s denial. In Madewell v. … Here, the Board reviewed the proper record and properly applied the rule of Bauman v.

Bailleaux v. Cupp

16 Or. App. 573 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 11, 1974

In Sterling v. … Bey v. Connecticut Board of Parole, 443 F.2d 1079, 1086 (CA2 1971).’ 408 US at 482, n 8 .

Harvey v. SAIF Corp.

286 Or. App. 539 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 2017

The board, however, adopted and affirmed the ALJ’s order, supplemented by its own reasoning. Citing SAIF v. … See Arms v.

Compensation of Korter v. EBI Companies, Inc.

46 Or. App. 43 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 5, 1980

Recently, this court in James v. … See Jones v. Emanuel Hospital, 280 Or 147 , 570 P2d 70 (1977); Williams v. SAIF, 31 Or App 1301 , 572 P2d 658 (1977).

SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BD. v. Emerald PUD

339 Or. 631 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 2005

See PGE v. … In Wasco County P.U.D. v.

Champion v. Employment Dept.

325 Or. App. 71 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 29, 2023

Affirmed. 72 Champion v. Employment Dept. HELLMAN, J. … Put another way, the board must provide an explanation for how it reached its conclusion. Castro v. Board of Parole, 232 Or App 75, 83, 220 P3d 772 (2009).