Case law

United Steel, Paper & Forestry v. National Labor Relations Board

179 F. App'x 61 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 28, 2006

Although we give deference to Board decisions, we cannot uphold a decision that is inconsistent with controlling precedent. Int’l Union of Operating Eng’rs, Local 147, AFL-CIO v. NLRB, 294 F.3d 186, 188 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Because the Board’s conclusion that the lockout was lawful is inconsistent with the controlling precedent the Supreme Court set forth in NLRB v.

Robert H. Mourning v. National Labor Relations Board, McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Intervenor

505 F.2d 421 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 17, 1974

See SEC v. Chenery Corp. (I), 318 U.S. 80, 92 , 63 S.Ct. 454 , 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943). 9 . See Bryant Chucking Grinder Co. v. NLRB, 389 F.2d 565, 568 (2d Cir. 1967), applying the dictum in NLRB v. … Since the Labor Board, as other administrative agencies, has no particular expertise in the area of fair procedures, cf. Ridge Radio Corp. v.

Mayflower Hotel Stockholders Protective Committee v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.

173 F.2d 416 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 26, 1949

Justice Brown then proceeded to specifically quote with great approval the leading case, Wardell v. Railroad Company, 103 U.S. 651 , 26 L.Ed. 509 . … Brown, 3 Cir., 235 F. 669 . 18 Farmers’ Loan, etc. Co. v. New York, etc. R. Co., 1896, 150 N.Y. 410 , 44 N.E. 1043 , 34 L.R.A. 76 , 55 Am.St.Rep. 689 ; Barr v. N. Y., etc., Co., 1884, 96 N.Y. 444 ; George v.

Kleo Ag v. Rivada Networks, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 16, 2023

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 246 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (cleaned up). … Browning, 292 F.3d at 246; cf. United States ex rel. Davis. v. District of Columbia, 591 F.

Truck Drivers And Helpers Local No. 728 v. National Labor Relations Board

386 F.2d 643 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 6, 1967

386 F.2d 643 TRUCK DRIVERS AND HELPERS LOCAL NO. 728, affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Petitioner, v. … International Union, United Auto., Aerospace & Agricultural Workers v. NLRB (Preston Products Co.), 126 U.S.App.D.C. 11 , 373 F.2d 671, 674 (1967). The Board takes no position on the motion to transfer.

City of Oakland Ex Rel. Board of Port Commissioners v. Federal Maritime Commission

724 F.3d 224 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 26, 2013

Before: HENDERSON and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and GINSBURG, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … Co. v.

Pontiac Nursing Home, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

173 F. App'x 846 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 24, 2006

The Board has “broad discretion to assess the propriety and results of representation elections.” AOTOP, L.L.C. v. NLRB, 331 F.3d 100 , 103 (D.C.Cir.2003) (internal quotation marks omitted). … Randell Warehouse of Ariz., Inc. v.

Hellenic Lines Limited v. Federal Maritime Board and the United States of America

295 F.2d 138 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1961

The carriers and conferences contend that the respective orders directed to them are invalid for substantially the same reasons presented in Montship Lines, Ltd. v. … of the Board’s regulatory duties under that Act, the Board needs the reports, accounts, records, rates, charges and memoranda of facts and transactions hereinafter described * * *.

Grumbine v. Mayor of Washington

9 D.C. 578 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1876

Jackson v. Gonzales

496 F.3d 703 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 2007

Stewart, *709 352 F.3d at 429 ; see also Browning v. Dep’t of the Army, 436 F.3d 692, 698 (6th Cir.2006) (“Questioning [the employer’s] hiring criteria is not within the province of this court_”). … See Lamb v.

Amobi v. District of Columbia Department of Corrections

755 F.3d 980 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 2014

Brown also testified he attempted to smuggle marijuana into the Jail the weekend before the June 2006 assault. S.A. 290–91.  6 Brown v. D.C. Dep’t of Corrections, 2006 SC3 014278 (D.C. … Smith v.

Argote v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 8, 2016

District of Columbia Board of Higher Education, 359 A.2d 28, 31 n. 4 (D.C. 1976) (holding that the Board of Higher Education is not an entity that can be sued); Miller v. … Jones v. Ottenberg’s Bakers, Inc., 999 F. Supp. 2d 185, 190 (D.D.C. 2013); Brown v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 3 603 F. Supp. 2d 73, 78 (D.D.C. 2009); Hardy v.

Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board (State of Rhode Island, Intervenor)

178 F.2d 726 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 30, 1949

scope of the proceeding is plainly within the Board’s discretion. … As the Board points out, “The large number of applications filed with the Board and the fact that they are invariably over-lapping, both as to the areas to be served and the type of services to be performed, necessitates

Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Association, William S. Apple Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Association

663 F.2d 253 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 12, 1981

E. g., Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. … Brown immunity for companies given exclusive selling rights by private company exercising authority power as nation's purchasing agent and alleged to be a co-conspirator); United Mine Workers v.

International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

502 F.2d 349 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 25, 1974

Hall v. Cole, supra, at 4-5 . … Dallas General Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local Union No. 745 v. NLRB, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 100 , 500 F.2d 768 (1974); West Texas Utilities Co. v.

Green v. Geren

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2011

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Frizelle v. Slater, 111 F.3d 172, 176 (D.C. Cir. 1997). The correction board’s decision need only “minimally contain ‘a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.’” Dickson v.

Atlantic Veal & Lamb, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

156 F. App'x 330 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 2005

unless ... those determinations are ‘hopelessly incredible,’ ‘self-contradictory,’ or ‘patently unsupportable.’ ” Cadbury Beverages, Inc. v. … NLRB, 160 F.3d 24, 28 (D.C.Cir.1998) (quoting Capital Cleaning Contractors, Inc. v. NLRB, 147 F.3d 999, 1004 (D.C.Cir.1998)).

International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

440 F.2d 298 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 23, 1970

This is the second time within the year that Tiidee has been before this court on charges of unfair labor practice by the Board. See IUERMW [Tiidee Products] v. … The Board’s application for enforcement of the order as issued is granted.

United States v. Royal

902 F. Supp. 268 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 24, 1995

U.S. v. Perkins, 963 F.2d at 1527. … United States v. Chatman, 986 F.2d at 1452 .

George, Diane v. Leavitt, Michael

407 F.3d 405 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 17, 2005

Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)). … See Weldon v.