Case law

Real Estate Loan Fund Oreg. Ltd. v. Hevner

76 Or. App. 349 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 1985

Kabil Developments Corp. v. Mignot, 279 Or 151, 156 , 566 P2d 505 (1977); Harty v. Bye, 258 Or 398, 403 , 483 P2d 458 (1971). In Kitzke v. … In Minniti v.

Davidson Baking Co. v. Industrial Indemnity Co.

20 Or. App. 508 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 10, 1975

When a determination of the true employer or employers has been made, the board shall direct any necessary monetary adjustment between the parties involved * * In Oremus v. Oregonian Pub. … Livingston v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 200 Or 468, 472 , 266 P2d 684 (1954); Mathis v. SAIF, supra, 10 Or App at 149 .

City of Eugene v. Department of Revenue

15 Or. Tax 1 · Oregon Tax Court · May 12, 1998

The Supreme Court addressed this issue in City of Portland v. … . *4 Hopper v.

Watts v. Spokane, P. & S. Ry. Co.

88 Or. 192 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1918

Returning in the evening they boarded the train at Rainier and when it arrived near Goble, the brakeman Burgess called that station and just before the train came to a stop the three men raised up from their seats in the … The language and conduct of counsel will justify a reversal only when connected with some judicial error on the part of the trial judge: Nelson v. Brown & McCabe, 81 Or. 472 ( 159 Pac. 1163 ); State v.

Aetna Casualty Co. v. Aschbacher

107 Or. App. 494 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 5, 1991

in Dethlefs v. … The Board relied on the court’s reasoning in Wright v. SAIF, 289 Or 323 , 613 P2d 755 (1980).

Walker v. Oregon Travel Information Council

367 Or. 761 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 8, 2021

In Brown v. … Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705, 688 P2d 811 (1984) (emphasis added).

Burkholder v. State Accident Insurance Fund

11 Or. App. 334 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 1972

. * # * # In Norton v. … State Compensation Dept., 3 Or App 38 , 471 P2d 826 (1970), Hinkle v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 163 Or 395 , 97 P2d 725 (1940), overruled on other grounds, Dimitroff v. State Ind. Acc.

Simi v. LTI Inc. - Lynden Inc.

301 Or. App. 535 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2019

See Simi v. … The board cited our opinion in Akins v.

Netherton v. Aerotek Inc.-Allegis Grp. Inc. (In re Netherton)

292 Or. App. 550 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 2018

. *551 Claimant petitions for review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board. … We conclude that this case is controlled by our prior decisions in McDermott v. SAIF , 286 Or. App. 406 , 398 P.3d 964 (2017), and Magana-Marquez v. SAIF , 276 Or. App. 32 , 366 P.3d 764 (2016), and affirm.

Heller v. Ebb Auto Co.

308 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 16, 1989

See, e.g., Dennis v. Employment Div., 302 Or 160 , 728 P2d 12 (1986); Hyde v. Employment Division, 302 Or 171 , 728 P2d 19 (1986). … Similarly, although the Board may decide the merits of a compensation claim anew on the referee’s record, see OAR 472- 10-020(l)(b) and (c); Dennis v.

Henthorn v. Grand Prairie School District No. 14

287 Or. 683 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1979

Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Benton County, 287 Or 591 , 601 P2d 769 (1979), and Leckleider v. Carson, 156 Or 636, 641 , 68 P2d 482 (1937). See also K. … Zollinger v. Warner, 286 Or 19 , 593 P2d 1107 (1979).

South Benton Education Ass'n v. Monroe Union High School District 1

83 Or. App. 425 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 28, 1987

Kelly, 275 Or 585, 593 , 552 P2d 1301 (1976), quoting United Packinghouse Workers v. … Davis v. Wasco IED, 286 Or 261, 272 , 593 P2d 1152 (1979); Thompson v. IDS Life Insurance Co., 274 Or 649, 656 , 549 P2d 510 (1976); State v. Warner, 52 Or App 987, 992 , 630 P2d 385 , rev den 291 Or 662 (1981).

Bailleaux v. Cupp

16 Or. App. 573 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 11, 1974

In Sterling v. … Bey v. Connecticut Board of Parole, 443 F.2d 1079, 1086 (CA2 1971).’ 408 US at 482, n 8 .

State v. Standard Oil Co.

61 Or. 438 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1912

The rule is stated in the late case of Brown-Forman Co. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 217 U. S. 563 , at page 575 (30 Sup. Ct. 578, at page 580: 54 L. … .” — citing Brown v. Huston, 114 U. S. 622 (5 Sup. Ct. 1091: 29 L. Ed. 257 ) ; Machine Co. v. Gage, 100 U. S. 676 ( 25 L. Ed. 754 ).

SAIF v. Kelkay

336 Or. App. 444 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 27, 2024

The board observed that, although SAIF’s argu- ment was consistent with an older line of board orders, our decision in Guill v. M. … Applying that framework, the board concluded that the 450 SAIF v.

Hicks v. SAIF Corp.

194 Or. App. 655 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 25, 2004

As we said in Khrul v. Foremans Cleaners, 194 Or App 125 , 93 P3d 820 (2004), in reviewing the director’s order on reconsideration, the board is not free to determine a claimant’s impairment. … (“Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, only the attending physician at the time of closure may make findings regarding the worker’s impairment for the purpose of evaluating the worker’s disability.”); Koitzsch v.

Foreman v. School District No. 25

81 Or. 587 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1916

McComb, 18 Colo. 240 ( 32 Pac. 424 ); Hull v. Independent Dist. of Aplington, 82 Iowa, 686 ( 46 N. W. 1053 , 48 N. W. 82 ,10 L. R. A. 273); People ex rel. v. Board of Education, 174 N. Y. 169 ( 66 N. … E. 674 ); Kellison v. School Dist., 20 Mont. 153 ( 50 Pac. 421 ); Butcher v. Charles, 95 Tenn. 532 ( 32 S. W. 631 ); Arnold v. School Dist., 78 Mo. 226; Richards v. School Dist. Board, 78 Or. 621 ( 153 Pac. 482 , L. R.

SAIF Corp. v. Traner

270 Or. App. 67 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 25, 2015

So, too, has the board. In SAIF v. Stephens, 247 Or App 107, 109 , 269 P3d 62 (2011), a claimant asserted a claim for a new or omitted condition of coccydynia. … SAIF v. Allen, 320 Or 192, 211-12 , 881 P2d 773 (1994).

Mize v. Comcast Corp-AT & T Broadband

208 Or. App. 563 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 11, 2006

Rather, the board reasoned that, “for purposes of ORS 656.005(7)(a), a ‘material cause’ is a substantial cause, something more than minimal. See Van Blokland v. … Claimant did not appeal the ALJ’s ruling upholding the denial of the aggravation claim to the board. Cf. State v.

SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BD. v. Emerald PUD

339 Or. 631 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 2005

See PGE v. … In Wasco County P.U.D. v.