Case law

Lewis v. State

681 P.2d 772 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 11, 1984

See Williams v. State, 364 P.2d 702 (Okl.Cr.1961). This rule has been applied to sustain evidence of prior convictions similar to that at bar. See Brown v. … State, 578 P.2d 364 (Okl.Cr.1978) (defendant named “John Hubert Brown”; judgments and sentences in the name of “Johnny Hubert Brown” and “John H. Brown”).

RUTHER v. OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM

417 P.3d 1279 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 2018

RUTHER v. … Cates v. Integris Health, Inc ., 2018 OK 9, ¶ 7, __ P.3d ___ (footnotes omitted).

In re State Board of Medical Examiners

201 Okla. 365 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1949

In McCoy et al. v. … Posey et al. v. Board of Education, etc., 199 N. C. 306 , 154 S. E. 393 , 70 A. L.

Wallace v. Bullen

6 Okla. 17 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 17, 1896

Crawford v. Lothrop, 3 Col. 428 ; Kittle v. Sherwin, 11 Neb. 66 ; State, ex rel. Lincoln v. Edwards, 31 Neb. 370 ; Kimball v. Savings L. & T. Co., 89 Ill. 611 ; Orr v. … . *33 In Kittle v.

School District No. 39, Pottawatomie County v. Shelton

26 Okla. 229 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1910

(Reeves & Co. v. Brennan, 106 Pac. 959 ; Buckner v. Oklahoma Nat. Bank, et al., 106 Pac. 959 ; Ellis et al. v. Outler et al., 106 Pac. 957 ; Butler et al. v. McSpadden, 107 Pac. 170 [cases reported in 25 Okla.]). … The statute does not vest *232 the powers of the district in three persons, but in a single board, called the district board. Whitford v. Scott, 14 How. Prac. [N. Y.] 302; Lee v. Parry, 4 Denio [N. Y.] 125; Keeler v.

Riggan v. Faulkner

184 Okla. 605 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1939

Nettles v. Carson, 77 Okla. 219 , 187 P. 799 ; Norton-Johnson Buick Co. v. Lindley, 173 Okla. 93 , 46 P.2d 525 . … Norton-Johnson Buick Co. v. Lindley, supra; Page v. Allison, 173 Okla. 205 , 47 P.2d 134 ; Roberts v. Callis, 177 Okla. 359 , 58 P.2d 1232 ; Greenawalt v. Wilson (Kan.) 34 P. 403 ; 37 C. J. p. 342, sec. 68; 37 C.

BD. OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS v. STATE ex. rel. OFFICE OF JUVENILE AFFAIRS

2021 OK CIV APP 40 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 3, 2021

See Bird v. … Dani v.

CITY OF JENKS v. STONE

2014 OK 11 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 25, 2014

Runyon v. Reid , 1973 OK 25, ¶15 , 510 P.2d 943, 946 . V. … Id. ; Gilmore v.

State v. Little Raven

537 P.2d 448 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 1975

See Holt v. State, Okl.Cr., 506 P.2d 561 (1973), and McAllister v. State, 97 Okl.Cr. 167 , 260 P.2d 454 (1953). … The effect of Judge Brown’s sustaining the defendant’s Motion to Quash may be determined by referring to this Court’s language in Patrick v.

Ivester v. State Ex Rel. Gillum

183 Okla. 519 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 26, 1938

(a) As to that class of taxpayers who did appear before the county board of equalization, the decision of that board, if unappeaied from, became final (State v. Stockholders of Commercial Nat. … Carrico v. Crocker (1913) 38 Okla. 440 , 133 P. 181 ; Huckins Hotel Co. v. Board of *521 CommTs, supra.

Calloway v. State Ex Rel. Mothersead

117 Okla. 43 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 1926

Ray Brown et al. and against the plaintiff Bose Calloway in case No. 11465. This appeal, however, only involves the merits of suit No. 11465, Calloway v. Brown et al. … This court has held in the case of Etchen v.

Benedict Bros. Const. Co. v. Davoult

266 P.2d 960 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1953

Showalter, attorney for plaintiff, and Mart Brown, attorney for defendant. … In Russell v.

Fite v. State

873 P.2d 293 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1994

In Brown v. … Accordingly, we overrule Brown v. State, 314 P.2d 362, 366 (Okl.Cr.1957), to the extent that it is inconsistent with this opinion.

First Presbyterian Church in the United States v. Cumberland Presbyterian Church

34 Okla. 503 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1912

S.) 665; Bentle v. Ulay (Ind.) 94 N. E. 759 ; Wallace v. Hughes, 131 Ky. 445 , 115 S. W. 684 ; Carothers v. Moseley (Miss.) 55 So. 881 ; Brown v. Clark, 102 Tex. 323 , 116 S. W. 360 , 24 L. R. A. (N. S.) 670. … Boyles v. Roberts, 222 Mo. 613 , 121 S. W. 805 ; Landrith v. Hudgins, 121 Tenn. 556 , 120 S. W. 783 .

Murphy v. Spring

58 F. Supp. 3d 1241 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Nov 4, 2014

the Board as reflected in the notice. … Montgomery v. City of Ardmore, 365 F.3d 926, 935 (10th Cir.2004); Brown v. Town of LaBarge, Wyo., 97 Fed.Appx. 216, 223 (10th Cir.2004); Foraker v. Schauer, No. CIVA04CV840, 2005 WL 1862072 , at *7 (D.Colo.

Blackwell v. McCall

54 Okla. 96 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1915

Thereafter Rosa Blackwell married one Brown. … Brown, of Nowata, Indian Territory, is the guardian of Hazel Blackwell and Solomon Blackwell, and that King David Blackwell now lives with his mother, Rosa Brown, nee Blackwell, and that on March 11, 1907, that Archibold

ASHTON v. STATE

400 P.3d 887 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 2017

Brown telephoned her mother and asked her to come pick her up. When she arrived, Brown, Appellant and Goff got into the car. Appellant laid down in the backseat so he could not been seen. … Bland v.

Williams, County Clerk v. Garfield Exchange

38 Okla. 539 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1912

W. 985 ; Stanley v. Board of Supervisors, 131 U. S. 535 , 7 Sup. Ct. 1334, 30 L. Ed. 1000 ; Shelton v. Platt, 139 U. S. 591 , 11 Sup. Ct. 646, 35 L. Ed. 373 ; Pittsburg, etc., Ry. Co. v. Board of Public Works, 173 U. … Cr. v. Babcock, 204 U. S. 585 , 27 Sup. Ct. 326, 51 L. Ed. 636 ; Board of Co. Com’rs, Finnery Co. v. Bullard, Supra; Maish v. Arizona, 164 U. S. 599 , 17 Sup. Ct. 193, 41 L. Ed. 567 ; Western Union Tel. Co. v.

Carrico v. Crocker

38 Okla. 440 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1913

of Com’rs of Kingfisher County v. … Guarantee State Bank et al., 27 Okla. 736 , 117 Pac. 216 ; Asher State Bank v. Board of Com’rs of Pottawatomie County, 31 Okla. 145 , 120 Pac. 634 ; Williams v. Garfield Exchange Bank, ante, 134 Pac. 863 ; Rumph v.

Morrison v. State

49 Okla. Crim. 369 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 3, 1931

Ev. (9th Ed.) § 463; Southard v. Rexford, 6 Cow. [N. Y.] 254; People v. Mather, 4 Wend. [N. Y.] 229 [ 21 Am. Dec. 122 ]; Lister v. Boker, 6 Blackf. [Ind.] 439.” See, also, Boyd v. U. S., 116 U. S. 616 , 6 S. … Scribner v. State, supra; McConnell v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 688 , 107 Pac. 521 , 523; Barnett v. State, 23 Okla. Cr. 363 , 214 Pac. 948 .