Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

3.70s

  • Fraternal Order of Police v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

    391 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2005

    See, e.g., Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341, 343 , 96 S.Ct. 2074 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976), overruled in part on other grounds by Cleveland Board of Educ. v. … .”); Babbitt v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Save Our Schools-Southeast & Northeast v. District of Columbia Board of Education

    564 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 11, 2008

    Save Our Sch., 2006 WL 1827654 , at *4 (citing Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 , 123 S.Ct. 2411 , 156 L.Ed.2d 257 (2003); Allen v. … Buggs v. Powell, 293 F.Supp.2d 135, 141 (D.D.C.2003) (citing FDIC v. Bender, 127 F.3d 58, 67-68 (D.C.Cir.1997)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McDonnell Douglas Corporation, and Its Related Divisions v. National Labor Relations Board

    59 F.3d 230 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 1995

    NLRB v. … , SEC v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Farrell Lines, Inc. v. Dole

    619 F. Supp. 298 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 1985

    See American Maritime Association v. United States, 766 F.2d 545, 556-57 (D.C.Cir.1985) (citing Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. … See Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138, 142 , 93 S.Ct. 1241, 1244 , 36 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973) (per curiam); Aeron Marine Shipping Co. v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Maritime Subsidy Board, Farrell Lines, Incorporated v. James H. Burnley, IV, 901 F.2d 1119 (1990)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Metcalf v. National Petroleum Council

    407 F. Supp. 257 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 9, 1976

    In Flast v. … See also Holtzman v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Cooper Associates, Inc.

    607 F.2d 1385 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 28, 1979

    App. 98-101 (ALJ’s Decision and Order); App. 115-20 (Benefits Review Board Decision). . Banks v. … .”); O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, supra, 340 U.S. at 508 , 71 S.Ct. at 472 (“the findings are to be accepted unless they are unsupported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole.”). . App. 105. .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Boeing Airplane Co. v. Coggeshall

    280 F.2d 654 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 1960

    Rosseau v. Langley, supra. … See National Labor Relations Board v. Botany Worsted Mills, 3 Cir., 1939, 106 F.2d 263, 267 ; Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. United States, 1958, 157 F.Supp. 939 , 141 Ct.Cl. 38 ; Zacher v.

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. National Labor Relations Board

    789 F.2d 9 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 1986

    We, in turn, once again remanded the case to the Board. In Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. … In NLRB v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Antioch University

    418 A.2d 105 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1980

    Mangum, D.C.App., 368 A.2d 548, 553 (1977); District Unemployment Compensation Board v. Security Storage of Washington, supra; Wieck v. Sterenbuch, D.C.App., 350 A.2d 384 (1976). … See generally Brown v. National Loan & Investment Co., 139 S.W.2d 364 (Tex.Civ.App.1940).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Teamsters National United Parcel Service Negotiating Committee v. National Labor Relations Board

    17 F.3d 1518 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 25, 1994

    See id. at 326-30 (Board Order); see also International Ladies Garment Workers’ Union v. … Both the Company and the Union attack the Board’s holding as contrary to Board precedent and therefore arbitrary and capricious. See International Union of Petroleum & Industrial Workers v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Waukesha State Bank and Wabank & Co. v. National Credit Union Administration Board

    968 F.2d 71 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 1992

    As the Supreme Court noted in Langley v. … (quoting Heckler v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees of the Hotel & Restaurant Employees Local 25 v. Madison Hotel, Inc.

    43 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 1999

    See Board of Trustees of the Hotel and Restaurant Employees Local 25 v. Madison Hotel, Inc., 97 F.3d 1479, 1478-79 (D.C.Cir.1996). … See Board of Trustees of the Hotel and Restaurant Employees Local 25 v. JPR, Inc., 136 F.3d 794, 806 (D.C.Cir.1998) (citing Covington v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Fruit And Vegetable Packers And Warehousemen Local 760 v. National Labor Relations Board

    316 F.2d 389 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 1963

    316 F.2d 389 114 U.S.App.D.C. 388 FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PACKERS AND WAREHOUSEMEN LOCAL 760 Affiliated With the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Petitioner, v. … by the Board on this issue contravenes the spirit, if not the precise holding, of National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Boeing Airplane Company v. Thomas Coggeshall, Chairman, the Renegotiation Board, Thomas Coggeshall, Chairman, the Renegotiation Board v. Boeing Airplane Company, Boeing Airplane Company, Cross-Appellant v. Thomas Coggeshall, Chairman, the Renegotiation Board, Cross-Appellee

    280 F.2d 654 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 1960

    280 F.2d 654 BOEING AIRPLANE COMPANY, Appellant v. Thomas COGGESHALL, Chairman, The Renegotiation Board, Appellee. Thomas COGGESHALL, Chairman, The Renegotiation Board, Appellant v. BOEING AIRPLANE COMPANY, Appellee. … v.

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • Townsend v. Department of the Navy

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 2010

    (Def.’s Mem. at 23-24); see also Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 828-29 (1976) (Title VII “provides the exclusive judicial remedy for claims of discrimination in federal employment” ); see also Spagnola v. … Kim v. United States, 618 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Warehousemen & Mail Order Employees, Local No. 743 v. National Labor Relations Board

    302 F.2d 865 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 1962

    National Labor Relations Board v. Borg-Warner Corp., 356 U.S. 342, 349 , 78 S.Ct. 718 (1958). . National Labor Relations Board v. … B. v. Katz, 289 F.2d 700 (2 Cir.), cert. granted, 368 U.S. 811 , 82 S.Ct. 53 , 7 L.Ed.2d 20 (1961); and see N. L. R. B. v. Herman Sausage Co., 275 F.2d 229 (5 Cir. 1960). . National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Independent Community Bankers of America v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System

    195 F.3d 28 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 1999

    .”); NRDC v. … In Securities Industries Ass’n v. Board of Governors of the Fed.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • M.M. & G., Inc. v. Jackson

    612 A.2d 186 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1992

    See Bennerson v. … Co. v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Cowperwaithe v. Gill

    6 F. Cas. 674 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Sep 20, 1859

    in the market Another witness saw these machines in use in 1843; saw them daily in operation six or nine months; Fosket made hat bodies on them for Tolman; and adds that Fosket and others, joint owners with the witness (Brown … In an interview between Fosket and Gill, at the house of the latter, he showed the former all the operation of the machine, including the internal regulator, the perforated board, and Fosket then made no claim to the internal

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Exxel/atmos, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, United Steelworkers of America, Intervenor

    147 F.3d 972 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 26, 1998

    The Board issued the first of its orders on remand from our decision in Exxel/Atmos, Inc. v. NLRB, 28 F.3d 1243 (D.C.Cir.1994). … v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.