Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,550 results
4.01s
38 Me. 350 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1854
Barrett v. Barrett, 8 Greenl. 353; Ware v. Webb, 32 Maine, 41; Austin v. Bostwich, 9 Conn. 496 ; Martin v. Williams, 17 Johns. 330 ; Newlin v. Duncan, 1 Harring. 204 ; Oliver v. Gray, 1 Har. & Gill. 264; Bell v. … C. 351; Lonsdale v. Brown, 3 Wash. C. C. 404 ; Ames v. LeRue, 2 McLean, 216 .
Cited 0 timesPublished854 A.2d 212 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 11, 2004
DISCUSSION [¶ 5] We addressed a similar issue in Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 651 A.2d 358, 362 (Me.1994). … Harding v. Sheridan D. Smith, Inc., 647 A.2d 1193 (Me.1994).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSouth Port Marine, LLC v. Gulf Oil Ltd. Partnership
56 F. Supp. 2d 104 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 26, 1999
Justice Brown, concurring, announced that the effect was to “practically” overrule The Plymouth. Id. at 368, 25 S.Ct. 46 . Justice Brown was wrong. … The Plymouth, 3 Wall. 20, 34 , 18 L.Ed. 125 (1865) (no jurisdiction over tort action brought by the owner of warehouse destroyed in a fire that started on board a ship docked nearby).
Cited 1 timesPublished8 Me. 411 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1832
Widgery v. Haskell. 5 Mass. 144 ; Stevens v. Bell, 6 Mass. 339 . … Ch. 531 ; Brown v. Minium, 2 Gall. 557 . In Brooks v. Marbury, 11 Wheat. 78 , Marshall C.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMcNally v. Douglas Bros., Inc.
838 A.2d 1176 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 23, 2003
See Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 651 A.2d 358, 360 (Me.1994). … The entry is: Decision of the hearing officer is vacated and remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board for further proceedings consistent with the opinion herein. 1 .
Cited 1 timesPublished325 A.2d 34 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 5, 1974
In Brown v. … In these three basic respects our facts equal those upon which the United States Supreme Court denied standing in Brown .
Cited 11 timesPublished10 F. Cas. 1077 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · Oct 15, 1847
Golden Rose [Case No. 1,658]; Putman v. The Polly [Id. 11,482]; Hurry v. The John & Alice [Id. 6,923]; Rucher v. Conyngham [supra]; 2 Browne, Civ. & Adm. Law, 196; Hurry v. Hurry [Case No. 6,922]; 1 Dod. 2, 3; 2 Bl. … Wilmer v. The Smilax [Case No. 17,777]; 2 Browne, Civ. & Adm. Law, 530; The Draco, [supra]. But the interest allowed must be •only 6 per cent., as the marine risk never actually began. Marsh. Ins. 647; Williams v.
Cited 0 timesPublished495 A.2d 828 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1985
See Pettitt v. Lizotte, 454 A.2d 329 , 335 n. 7 (Me.1982); Teel v. Colson, 396 A.2d 529, 535 (Me.1979). … Henry v. Brown, 495 A.2d 324 (Me.1985) (ordinary negligence supporting claim).
Cited 3 timesPublished144 Me. 162 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 18, 1949
Those authorities, without distinguishing between those cited by the Commission and the petitioners, are Petraska v. National Acme Co. et al., 95 Vt. 76 ; 113 A. 536 ; Industrial Commission et al. v. … Hammond, 77 Colo. 414 ; 236 P. 1006 ; Cardillo et al. v. Liberty *166 Mutual Insurance Co., 69 App. D. C. 330; 101 F. (2nd) 254; Morris v. Laughlin Chevrolet Co. et al., 217 N. C. 428 ; 8 S. E. (2nd) 484; 128 A. L.
Cited 8 timesPublished33 Me. 242 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1851
In the conversion of logs into boards, it is probably never expected that the boards should be seasoned or planed, to make the manufacture complete. … Morton v. Fairbanks, 11 Pick. 368 . Exceptions sustained — Note. — Shepeey, C. J., did not attend at the argument, and took no part in the decision. New trial granted.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCasco Northern Bank, N.A. v. Edwards
640 A.2d 213 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 22, 1994
Brown v. Manchester, 384 A.2d 449 , 453 n. 4 (Me.1978) (emphasis in original). The only conduct engaged in by Casco was the execution of the power of attorney to BBMC, clearly limited by its terms to home mortgages. … Levesque v. Chan, 569 A2d 600, 601 (Me.1990).
Cited 11 timesPublishedWoods v. Inhabitants of Bristol
84 Me. 358 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 23, 1892
Brown v. Lunt, 37 Maine, 429. Little had no legal right. His election was wholly void for *360 want of authority in the district to elect him, they having already elected another. … Starbird v. Dist. No. 7 in Falmouth, 51 Maine, 101.
Cited 1 timesPublished133 F. 405 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 26, 1904
In this district, in Baker v. Hemenway, 2 Low. 501 , Fed. Cas. … They should be encouraged in the manner pointed out by Judge Lowell in Baker v. Hemenway, supra.
Cited 2 timesPublished649 A.2d 1096 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 8, 1994
Board of Selectmen, etc. v. Kennebec County Comm’rs, 393 A.2d 526, 528 (Me.1978). … A municipality may discontinue a town way or public easement after the municipal officers have given best practicable notice to all abutting property owners and the municipal planning board or office and have filed an order
Cited 2 timesPublished186 F.R.D. 249 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 14, 1999
Similarly, the Indiana Court of Appeals in Becker v. … Accord, Petrillo v. Syntex Labs., Inc., 148 Ill.App.3d 581 , 102 Ill.Dec. 172 , 499 N.E.2d 952, 962-63 (1986), superceded by statute, Kunkel v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States v. Petraia Maritime Ltd.
489 F. Supp. 2d 90 · District Court, D. Maine · May 22, 2007
All four crew-members testified regarding their actions and role in bypassing the OWS, discharging oily bilge and sludge waste overboard and in ultimately creating the false records maintained on board the M/V Kent Navigator … Comm’n v.
Cited 1 timesPublished29 F. Cas. 697 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 15, 1875
Hill v. Murray [Case No. 6,495]. In Hindman v. … mate, agreed to pay his board.
Cited 2 timesPublished586 F. Supp. 1414 · District Court, D. Maine · May 18, 1984
Arizona, 437 U.S. 385, 398 , 98 S.Ct. 2408, 2416 , 57 L.Ed.2d 290 (1978); Brown v. … United States v. Halbert, 436 F.2d at 1237 . Similarly, the nature and setting of the interrogation must be reviewed to determine whether oppressive police practices produced the statement. Id. See also Brown v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedPinchbeck v. The Town of Windham
Superior Court of Maine · Sep 8, 2009
See Stewart v. … Sanborn v. Eliot, 425 A.2d 629, 630 (Me. 1981) (citing Brown v. Town of Wells, 402 A.2d 57,58 (Me. 1979); Gashgai v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 390 A.2d 1080, 1085 (Me. 1978)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished78 Me. 287 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 14, 1886
North Bank v. Brown, 50 Maine, 214; Sweet v. Brackley, 53 Maine, 346. The same doctrine is held by the Supreme Court of the United States. Insurance Co. v. Harris, 97 U. S. 331 . … Citing Mills v. Duryee, 7 Cranch, 481 ; Mayhew v. Thatcher, 6 Wheat. 129 ; Habich v. Folger, 20 *295 Wall, 1; Bumby v. Stephenson, 24 Ohio, 474; and Dobson v. Pearce, 12 N. Y. 156 .
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna