Case law

Hecht v. Boston Wharf Co.

220 Mass. 397 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 27, 1915

Knowles v. Atlantic & St. Lawrence Railroad, 38 Maine, 55, arose out of gratuitous bailment. Brown v. Hitchcock, 28 Vt. 452, 458 , and Parker v. … No such circumstances are to be found in the cases at bar. ■ The plaintiffs Hecht and others and Brown and others sold certain bags of wool, stored with the defendant, before December 26, 1909, and received full payment therefor

Boston Police Department v. Jones

Massachusetts Appeals Court · Nov 10, 2020

See Brown v. Office of and that they are able to prove their entitlement to these categories of compensation without speculation. … Brown, 475 Mass. at 679.

Sellers's Case

71 Mass. App. Ct. 75 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jan 17, 2008

The trust fund then appealed to the DIA reviewing board (board). The board concluded that in keeping with the remedial purpose of the act, an “insured employer” as used in G. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 431 Mass. 772, 775 (2000).

John Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 460386 v. Sex Offender Registry Board.

Massachusetts Appeals Court · Mar 8, 2023

SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY BOARD. … No. 496501 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 482 Mass. 643, 649 (2019).

Barry v. Sparks

4 Mass. App. Div. 183 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · May 5, 1939

Greeley v. Greeley, 258 Mass. 460, 463 . … Brown v. Brighton, 136 Mass. 187 . Stone v. Duffy, 219 Mass. 178 . Miller’s case, 244 Mass. 281, 283 . Such was also the decision in Ryder v. Parker, 219 Mass. 525, 527 .

Commonwealth v. Galvin

323 Mass. 205 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 23, 1948

Brown after he had been accepted as juror number 8 by both parties and had been sworn. … The ■record is not clear, but we assume that juror Brown had been sworn, as it-is customary in first degree cases to administer the oath to each juror after he is accepted by both parties. Commonwealth v.

Leal v. Contributory Retirement

42 Mass. App. Ct. 330 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Mar 20, 1997

In State Retirement Bd. v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Bd., 12 Mass. App. … See Barlow v. Wareham, 401 Mass. 408, 411 (1988).

Culhane v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Newton

95 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · May 3, 2019

Given v. Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & Bonds

26 Mass. L. Rptr. 449 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Nov 3, 2009

Dist. v. Labor Relations Comm’n, 386 Mass. 414, 420-21 (1982). … Zoning Bd. of Appeals v. Housing Appeals Comm., 385 Mass. 651, 657 (1982). As the party appealing the Board’s decision, Given bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Merisme v.

Board of Managers of the Old Colony Village Condominium v. Preu

27 Mass. L. Rptr. 130 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Oct 21, 2009

Berish v. … See Shaw v.

Leventhal v. Jennings

311 Mass. 622 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 29, 1942

With the authority and upon the direction of the general *625 executive board the international president appointed Jennings “receiver” for the local. Later the appointment was ratified by the general executive board. … Cornellier v. Haverhill Shoe Manufacturers’ Association, 221 Mass. 554, 561-564 . Howe v. Chmielinski, 237 Mass. 532, 536 . Church v. Brown, 247 Mass. 282, 287 . Shikes v. Gabelnick, 273 Mass. 201, 204-207 .

Warner v. Mayor of Taunton

253 Mass. 116 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 26, 1925

Wesson v. Washburn Iron Co. 13 Allen, 95 . Needham v. New York & New England Railroad, 152 Mass. 61 . Attorney General v. Boston & Albany Railroad, 246 Mass. 292, 296 . … Davis v. County Commissioners, 153 Mass. 218 . Robinson v. Brown, 182 Mass. 266 . Dwyer v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 209 Mass. 419 . 20 R. C. L. 476, 477. The decision in Brewster v.

Aiello v. Aiello

447 Mass. 388 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Aug 11, 2006

See Harhen v. Brown, 431 Mass. 838, 842-845, 848-849 (2000). See also Mass R. Civ. … See Harhen v. Brown, 431 Mass. 838, 842-844 (2000).

IDC Research, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue

78 Mass. App. Ct. 352 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Nov 30, 2010

Brown, J. … Higgins v. Smith, 308 U.S. 473, 478 (1940). The decision of the Appellate Tax Board is affirmed. So ordered. The board identified the following features in Sherwin-Williams Co. v.

Reardon v. Director of Civil Service

318 Mass. 173 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 2, 1945

The position is none the less “appointive” within the meaning of this section because the appointment takes the form of an election by a board like the school committee. Attorney General v. Trehy, 178 Mass. 186 . … Ed.) c. 31, § 3, as amended; § 5, as amended; § 43; Brown v. Russell, *175 166 Mass. 14, 15 ; Attorney General v. Tillinghast, 203 Mass. 539, 544 .

Levin v. United States

403 F. Supp. 99 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 12, 1975

The Court held that Brown was not barred by the Feres doctrine from suing under the F. … United States v.

Weaver's Case

4 Mass. App. Ct. 820 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jun 24, 1976

In light of the disclosure to the Superior Court judge that a supplemental medical report from the impartial physician had been obtained in violation of the rules of the Industrial Accident Board and that the reviewing board … Brown’s Case, 228 Mass. 31, 38 (1917). Locke, Workmen’s Compensation, § 585 (1968). It is not argued that there was error in the ultimate decision made by the court on the record returned by the board following remand.

Kelley v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Somerville

95 Mass. App. Ct. 1103 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Mar 19, 2019

Carleton v. China Mutual Insurance

46 L.R.A. 166 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 20, 1899

or not on board for one year from August 21,1895, at noon. … See also Brown v. Hartford Ins. Co. 3 Day, 58 . The earlier provisions of the clause provided for other insurance “ prior in date to this instrument,” and for insurance “ subsequent in date to this policy.”

Sherwood v. Hall

21 F. Cas. 1292 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1837

Under such circumstances, it was clearly his duty not to take the minor on board; but to discharge him. … In the case of The Thomas and Henry v. U. S. [Case No. 13,919], Mr.