Case law

Velazquez v. United States Department of the Army

District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 2026

See Bowman v. Iddon, 848 F.3d 1034, 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2017). That means, among other things, considering factual allegations from all his filings, not just his complaint. Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. … “This review is done through the [Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)].” Wil- helmus v. Geren, 796 F. Supp. 2d 157, 161 (D.D.C. 2011).

Fruit And Vegetable Packers And Warehousemen Local 760 v. National Labor Relations Board

316 F.2d 389 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 1963

316 F.2d 389 114 U.S.App.D.C. 388 FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PACKERS AND WAREHOUSEMEN LOCAL 760 Affiliated With the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Petitioner, v. … by the Board on this issue contravenes the spirit, if not the precise holding, of National Labor Relations Board v.

The Union National Bank of Clarksburg, a Corporation v. Home Loan Bank Board

233 F.2d 695 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 3, 1956

Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. McKay, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 273 , 278, 225 F.2d 924, 929 . Cf. First National Bank of McKeesport v. Home Loan Bank Board, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 194 , 225 F.2d 33 . Affirmed. 1 . … Mitchell v. Cohen, 333 U.S. 411, 417 , 68 S.Ct. 518 , 92 L.Ed. 774 . 3 . 77 Cong.Rec. 2480, 2481, 2506, 4987.

Fashion Valley Mall, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

451 F.3d 241 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 2008

Ryan v. Bentsen, 12 F.3d 245, 247 (D.C. Cir. 1993). The Board has never said it lacks jurisdiction to decide whether a state law is constitutional, cf. … See Arizonans for Official English v.

Meshel v. Ohev Sholom Talmud Torah

869 A.2d 343 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 2005

Brown, Inc. v. … J.M., 854 P.2d 1346, 1350 (Colo.Ct.App.1992); Brown v. Rock, 184 Ga.App. 699 , 362 S.E.2d 480, 481 (1987); Duffy v.

Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Intervenor

564 F.2d 592 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 21, 1977

As we pointed out in Pinellas Broadcasting Co. v. … Thus, to any extent the Board erred, the error was harmless and reversal is not required. Greater Boston Television Corp. v. FCC, supra.

Gerald Joseph Koptik v. Richard A. Chappell, Chairman, United States Board of Parole

321 F.2d 388 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 3, 1963

recently in Hyser v. … Newman v.

Burton v. Batista

339 F. Supp. 2d 97 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 12, 2004

. § 2000e et seq., plaintiff Robert Burton claims that he was the victim of unlawful sexual harassment and retaliation by defendant National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”), and specifically by his supervisor Lisa Bevels. … Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002); Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999).

District 29, United Mine Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

977 F.2d 1470 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 30, 1992

NLRB, 756 F.2d 888 , 892 (D.C.Cir.1985); see NLRB v. Denver Building and Construction Trades Council, 341 U.S. 675, 689 , 71 S.Ct. 943, 952 , 95 L.Ed. 1284 (1951), the Board found an unlawful secondary boycott. … See Universal Camera Cory. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); NLRB v.

Hartman v. Duffey

973 F. Supp. 199 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 4, 1997

See Murray v. Weinberger, 741 F.2d 1423, 1433 (D.C.Cir.1984). The Supreme Court’s decision in Landgraf v. … Following the Landgraf decision, the District of Columbia Circuit held in Brown v.

Exxel/atmos, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, United Steelworkers of America, Intervenor

147 F.3d 972 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 26, 1998

The Board issued the first of its orders on remand from our decision in Exxel/Atmos, Inc. v. NLRB, 28 F.3d 1243 (D.C.Cir.1994). … v.

Farzam v. Isaacson

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 11, 2015

Cir. 1997) (citing Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C. Cir. 1985)). … Bowden v. United States, 106 F.3d 433, 438 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (citing Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 15 (D.C. Cir. 1985)). Ms.

Nelson-White v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 2024

See Rogers v. … (quoting Board of Zoning Authority, Decision and Order at 8 (Oct. 30, 2018))); Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. 6,627 Square Feet of Land, No. CV 21- 1753, 2022 WL 2438549, at *2 (D.D.C.

Cummings v. Department of the Navy

279 F.3d 1051 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 15, 2002

Approximately seven months after Cummings’s Hornet training began, the Navy convened a Field Naval Aviator Evaluation Board (Evalua *1053 tion Board) to assess her flying skills and potential. … In Bois v.

Burgess v. Pelkey

738 A.2d 783 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1999

Etheredge v. … Worthinglen Condominium Unit Owners’ Ass’n v. Brown, 57 Ohio App.3d 73 , 566 N.E.2d 1275, 1277 (1989) (quoting Hidden Harbour Estates, Inc. v. Norman, 309 So.2d 180, 181-82 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1975)); see also Johnson v.

Plumbers and Pipe Fitters Local Union No. 32 v. National Labor Relations Board

50 F.3d 29 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1995

As early as 1967, in Truck Drivers, Local Union 568 v. … See, e.g., International Union of Elec., Elec., Salaried, Mach. and Furniture Workers v. NLRB, 41 F.3d 1532, 1537 (D.C.Cir.1994); see also NLRB v. Gen.

Stephens v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

755 F.3d 959 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 2014

Airways Retirement Board, which rejected Stephens’s claim in 1999. Neither Mahoney nor any other U.S. Airways pilot filed a similar claim with the airline or Retirement Board. … Id. at 440 (Brown, J., for the court).

United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., City and County of San Francisco, Intervenors. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., City and County of San Francisco, Intervenors

309 F.2d 238 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 11, 1962

Templeton Brown, Chicago, Ill., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Illinois, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Robert L. … Part 302 2 Procedural Regulations, Part 300.2 3 We are advised that the Board's Regulations have since been clarified 4 WKAT, Inc. v.

Walker v. Waller

267 F. Supp. 2d 31 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 2, 2003

Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets, 313 U.S. 100 , 61 S.Ct. 868 , 85 L.Ed. 1214 (1941); Nwachukwu v. … Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M Street LLC, 257 F.Supp.2d 175, 178 (D.D.C.2003).

Hellenic Lines Limited v. Federal Maritime Board and the United States of America

295 F.2d 138 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1961

The carriers and conferences contend that the respective orders directed to them are invalid for substantially the same reasons presented in Montship Lines, Ltd. v. … of the Board’s regulatory duties under that Act, the Board needs the reports, accounts, records, rates, charges and memoranda of facts and transactions hereinafter described * * *.