Case law

State of Tennessee v. Jon Seiler

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 30, 2004

United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 (1981); State v. Watkins, 827 S.W.2d 293, 294 (Tenn. 1992). … The Defendant asserts that his actions did not give Officer Brown reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle pursuant to State v. Binnette, 33 S.W.3d 215 (Tenn. 2000), and State v. John Crawley, Sr., No.

Bells Banking Co. v. Jackson Centre, Inc.

938 S.W.2d 421 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 26, 1996

Co. v. Crush Int'l 726 S.W.2d 926, 931 (Tenn.App.1986). … Co. v.

Passarella v. State

891 S.W.2d 619 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 28, 1994

In Monroe Brown v. … Dickens v. Bomar, 214 Tenn. 493, 499 , 381 S.W.2d 287, 289 (1964). In State ex rel. Brown v.

Phillips v. West

187 Tenn. 57 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1948

Buena Vista Special School Dist. v. Board of Election Com’rs, 173 Tenn. 198, 201 , 116 S. W. (2d) 1008 . … A member of a County Board of Education is a county officer. State ex rel. v. Groce, 152 Tenn. 566, 570 , 280 S.

State of Tennessee v. Mario Thomas

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 3, 2016

Brown took this opportunity to flee the house, and the defendant followed. The defendant was identified later through his distinctive facial tattoos. … State v. Bise, 380 S.W.3d 682, 707 (Tenn. 2012). Likewise, the “standard of appellate review for consecutive sentencing is abuse of discretion accompanied by a presumption of reasonableness.” State v.

State of Tennessee v. Michael Mullins

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 6, 2016

Allen v. State, 505 S.W.2d 715, 719 (Tenn. 1974); see Blackwell v. State, 546 S.W.2d 828, 830 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1976). … State v. Bishop, 493 S.W.2d 81, 83-84 (Tenn. 1973); see Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972).

Sparks v. Mena

294 S.W.3d 156 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 6, 2008

State v. Copeland, 226 S.W.3d 287, 301 (Tenn.2007); Brown v. Crown Equipment Corp., 181 S.W.3d 268, 273 (Tenn.2005). … Brown v. Crown Equipment Corp., 181 S.W.3d at 268, 274 (Tenn.2005).

In Re Estate of Leath

294 S.W.3d 571 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 3, 2008

Sanders v. McClanahan, 59 Tenn.App. 590 , 442 S.W.2d 664, 667 (1969) (citing Haven v. Wrinkle, 29 Tenn.App. 195 , 195 S.W.2d 787, 793 (1946)). As noted by this Court in Shrum v. … Again, the appellants seek to rely upon Brown, ibid,., in support of their argument and again, we find a clear distinction between Brown and this case.

Manning v. Feidelson

175 Tenn. 576 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1940

Sheffy v. Mitchell, 142 Tenn., 48, 50 , 215 S. W., 403 ; Board of Directors v. Bodkin Bros., 108 Tenn., 700 , 69 S. W., 270 ; Baker v. Mitchell, 105 Tenn., 610 , 59 S. W., 137 ; White v. … Harmon v. Tyler, 112 Tenn., 8 , 83 S. W., 1041 ; Board of Directors v. Bodkin Bros., supra; Ridley v. Halliday, 106 Tenn., 607 , 61 8. W., 1025, 53 L. R. A., 477, 82 Am. St. Rep., 902 ; Galyon v.

State Ex Rel. Sims v. Reagan

175 Tenn. 607 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1940

Peerless Construction Co. v. Bass, 158 Tenn., 518 , 14 S. W. (2d), 732 ; Insurance Co. v. Craig, 106 Tenn., 621 , 62 S. W., 155 ; Morley v. Power, 73 Tenn. (5 Lea), 691. In State ex rel v. … To like effect is the case of Cross v. Fisher, 132 Tenn., 31 , 177 S. W., 43 , Ann. Cas., 1916E, 1092.

Sircy v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County

182 S.W.3d 815 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 3, 2005

In support of its argument, Metro relies primarily on the cases of City of Lebanon v. Baird, 756 S.W.2d 236 (Tenn.1988) and Brown v. City of Manchester, 722 S.W.2d 394 (Tenn.Ct.App.1986). … Metro also contends that the trial court misapplied the case of Brown v. City of Manchester. See Brown, 722 S.W.2d at 394 .

Ted Ray Brannan v. State of Tennessee

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · May 15, 2002

The defendant, who was having difficulty contacting his counsel, complained about his counsel’s representation to the Board of Professional Responsibility. … Houston v.

Schlater v. Haynie

833 S.W.2d 919 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 13, 1991

State, ex rel Balsinger, 222 Tenn. 272 , 435 S.W.2d 803 (1968); Brown v. Weik, Tenn.App.1983, 725 S.W.2d 938 . … Plaintiff cites Electric Power Board v. St. Joseph Valley Structural Steel Corporation, Tenn.1985, 691 S.W.2d 522 .

Daniel G. Carr v. State of Tennessee - Concurring/Dissenting

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 21, 2019

See generally State v. Brown, 479 S.W.3d 200 (Tenn. 2015); Anthony Leslie v. State, No. M2018-00856-CCA-R3-HC, 2019 WL 3814623 (Tenn. Crim. App. Aug. 14, 2019), no perm. app. filed. … Furthermore, this case is distinguishable from State v. Brown, 479 S.W.3d 200 (Tenn. 2015), which it relied upon by the majority.

Parton v. State

483 S.W.2d 753 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 29, 1972

Brown v. Newell, 216 Tenn. 284 , 391 S.W.2d 667 . Postconviction proceedings may not be employed to question or review the sufficiency of the evidence at the original trial. Phillips v. … In Brown v.

City of Memphis v. Hood

208 Tenn. 319 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1961

Board of County Commissioners of Santa Fe County v. Slaughter, 49 N.M. 141 , 158 P.2d 859, 863 . … The property owner cites as authority for this proposition Carroll County Board of Education v. Caldwell, 178 Tenn. 671 , 162 S.W.2d 391 .

McClellan v. State

199 Tenn. 60 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1955

Putnam County Beer Board v. … See: Madison v. City of Maryville, 173 Tenn. 489 , 121 S. W. (2d) 540 ; State ex rel. Saperstein v. Bass, 177 Tenn. 609 , 152 S.

House v. Creveling

147 Tenn. 589 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1922

His other duties, in so far as this board is cohcerned, must be performed with the consent of tbe board, and no judicial function of tbe board is conferred upon this official, if it be conceded that tbe board of law examiners … We know, too, that the power to make rules is commonly given to boards and commissions. 12 C. J. 847; Woods v. State, supra.

Janice Bunch v. Tiffany Jones

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 30, 2015

Carr, III and Glankler Brown, PLLC.  OPINION I. Background On March 18, 2009, Glankler Brown, PLLC (“Glankler”) and Oscar C. … In its notice of attorney‟s lien, Appellees argue, in relevant part, that: With regard to attorney fees incurred by Glankler Brown . . . Glankler Brown and Plaintiff Janice L.

421 Corp. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County

36 S.W.3d 469 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 26, 2000

The proper vehicle for reviewing decisions of local boards of zoning appeals is the common-law writ of certiorari. See McCallen v. City of Memphis, 786 S.W.2d 633, 639 (Tenn.1990). … See Hoover, Inc. v. Metropolitan Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 955 S.W.2d at 55 . II. The Board’s Interpretation of the Local Zoning Ordinance and Reliance on State Law Mr.