Case law

Hare v. McIntire

8 L.R.A. 450 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 4, 1890

Dwelly v. Dwelly, 46 Maine, 377; Carle v. Bangor & Pisc. Canal R. R. Co., 43 Maine, 269. … And it has been directly adjudicated in Wright v. Roxburgh, 2 Ct. Sess. Cas. (3d series) 748; Hinds v. Harbou, 58 Ind. 121 ; Hinds v. Overacher, 66 Ind. 547 ; Griffiths v. Wolfram, 22 Minn. 185 ; and in Osborne v.

Dudley v. Wyler

647 A.2d 90 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 25, 1994

See Niner v. … See Kleinschmidt v. Morrow, 642 A.2d 161, 165-66 (Me.1994); Bartner v.

Low v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.

72 Me. 313 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 6, 1881

Smith v. London & St. Catherine’s Docks Co. 3 L. R. C. P. 326. In Stratton v. … Wendell v. Baxter, 12 Gray, 494 , citing: Collett v. London & N. W.

Smith v. Treat

22 F. Cas. 687 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 4, 1845

At this moment, the captain came on board and put an end to the affray. The blows given to Hadley proved mortal, and he died the following night. … Thorne v. White [Case No. 13,989); Black v. The Louisiana [Id. 1,461]; Drysdale v. The Ranger [Id. 4,097]; Sprague v. Kain [Id. 13,250]; Orne v. Townsend [Id. 10,583]; The Lady Campbell, 2 Hagg.

Knight v. Portland, Saco & Portsmouth Railroad

56 Me. 234 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1868

The defendants introduced evidence tending to show that, at the entrance to the steamboat wharf was a guide-board, or sign, indicating the way to the steamboat. … Railroad Co. v.

Pejepscot Industrial Park, Inc. v. Maine Central Railroad

297 F. Supp. 2d 326 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 22, 2003

Bailey Co. v. … Counts V and VI The ICCTA reserves jurisdiction over transportation by rail carrier to the STB as follows: (b) The jurisdiction of the Board over- (1) transportation by rail carriers, and the remedies provided in this part

Inhabitants of Fort Fairfield v. Inhabitants of Millinocket

136 Me. 426 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 1, 1940

Carter v. Augusta, 84 Me., 418, 24 A., 892 ; Fairfield v. Oldtown, 73 Me., 577; Linneus v. Sidney, 70 Me., 114; Smithfield v. Waterville, 64 Me., 412; Fayette v. Livermore, 62 Me., 229; Windsor v. … It has never been held here or elsewhere, so far as research discloses, that overseers of the poor can delegate the exercise of their discretionary powers to persons not on the board.

Pennell v. Cummings

75 Me. 163 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 19, 1883

This act prescribes a condition, as to the single fact of insanity, without the fulfilment of which there cannot be a legal commitment to the hospital, Naples v. … Rex v. Jones, 2 B. & Ad. 611. The offence defined in this section might perhaps be complete, even if there were no intent to deceive and only the truth was certified.

State v. Tracy

991 A.2d 821 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 25, 2010

See Union River Assocs. v. Budman, 2004 ME 48, ¶ 17 , 850 A.2d 334, 340 ; Greenstreet v. Brown, 623 A.2d 1270, 1272 (Me.1993). … Baxter v.

United States v. Belanger

598 F. Supp. 598 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 19, 1984

Lubben v. Selective Service System Board No. 27, 453 F.2d 645, 651-52 (1st Cir.1972); Martinez-McBean v. Government of Virgin Islands, 562 F.2d 908, 912 (3d Cir.1977); Brown v. … United States v.

Inhabitants of Houlton v. Titcomb

102 Me. 272 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 18, 1906

But the State may declare what may, at law, be deemed a nuisance, Metropolitan Board of Health v. Heister, 37 N. Y. 661 ; 23 Am. Rep. 212 ; note. Dillon on Munic. Corp. 1, sec. 93. This State has declared, B. … The Board of Health of the City of Yonkers, Respondent, v. John Copcutt, Applt., 140 N. Y. 12 .

Tyler v. City of Augusta

88 Me. 504 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 19, 1896

The price was two hundred and fifty dollars per machine, delivered free of charge on board boat in Boston, discount for cash within ten days. … Norton v. Young, 3 Maine, 30; Marston v. Knight, 29 Maine, 341; Houghton v. Nash, 64 Maine, 477; Sharp v. Ponce, 76 Maine, *510 350; Downing v. Dearborn, 77 Maine, 457; Snow v. Alley, 144 Mass. 551 ; Morse v.

Cormier v. Funtown/Splashtown USA, Inc.

294 F. Supp. 2d 125 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 20, 2003

Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Counts II-V of the Complaint and Counts I-V of Defendants’ Counterclaim, etc. (“Motion”) (Docket No. 14) at 1. … At a board of directors meeting on November 10, 1999 Kenneth D.

Champagne v. State

262 A.2d 820 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 11, 1970

In the event of the withdrawal of the warrant by authority of the board, or in the event that the board at the hearing on the alleged violation finds that the parolee did not violate the conditions of his parole, or the law … We quoted with approval the statement found in State v.

State v. Patterson

651 A.2d 362 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 21, 1994

See State v. … State v.

Maine Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Androscoggin Junior, Inc.

137 Me. 154 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 7, 1940

In Coffin et al. v. … Carmichael et al. v. Southern Coal & Coke Co., supra; Howes Brothers Co. v. Massachusetts Unemployment Compensation Commission, 296 Mass., 275 , 5 N. E. (2d), 720; Gillum v. Johnson, 62 P. (2d), 1037 ; Tatum v.

Cassidy v. Holbrook

81 Me. 589 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 5, 1889

Pike v. Bagley, 4 N. H. 76; Baker v. Brown, 18 N. H. 551. … Pease v. Simpson, 12 Maine, 261. The present action is pending in the right court, though in a wrong county. Otis v. Ellis, 78 Maine, 75.

Hamel v. Pizzagalli Corp.

386 A.2d 741 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 26, 1978

Mullen v. Brown Homes, Inc., Me., 358 A.2d 557, 559 (1976). … McQuade v. Vahlsing, Inc., Me., 377 A.2d 469, 471 (1977); Martel v. United States Gypsum Co., Me., 329 A.2d 392, 394 (1974).

Williams v. Bisson

141 Me. 117 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 28, 1944

Erskine v. Savage, 96 Me., 57, 51 A., 242 . … This is the rule laid down in Erskine v. Savage, supra, which is controlling on this court. We find, therefore, that the defendants are guilty of a conversion.

Percy v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway

113 Me. 106 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 27, 1915

Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 230 U. S., 324 ; South & N. A. R. Co. v. Highland Ave. & B. R. Co., 119 Ala., 105 ; Hannah v. Met. St. R. Co., 81 Mo., App. 78; Williams v. … V.